Revision as of 17:17, 18 September 2013 editMusikAnimal (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Interface administrators, Administrators120,542 editsm Reverted edits by 87.95.165.113 (talk) to last revision by Uncle Milty (HG)← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:01, 20 September 2013 edit undoCharmlet (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers1,333 edits →ANI - L'Origine du monde: signNext edit → | ||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 75: | Line 75: | ||
Hi Reaper Eternal, thanks for blocking some of the sockpuppets at ]. I was curious why some of the Rinpoche socks have not been blocked - specifically ] (whose actions started the original SPI) and ] who "...is related to Rinpoche/the Amanda Jane Mason account." There is also ], who has not been checked that I can see, but sure passes the DUCK test to be a Rinpoche sock. I am an admin and can block them if that would help. ] ''']''' 03:11, 17 September 2013 (UTC) | Hi Reaper Eternal, thanks for blocking some of the sockpuppets at ]. I was curious why some of the Rinpoche socks have not been blocked - specifically ] (whose actions started the original SPI) and ] who "...is related to Rinpoche/the Amanda Jane Mason account." There is also ], who has not been checked that I can see, but sure passes the DUCK test to be a Rinpoche sock. I am an admin and can block them if that would help. ] ''']''' 03:11, 17 September 2013 (UTC) | ||
== ANI - L'Origine du monde == | |||
] Hello. There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. | |||
I should sign this, apologies ~] <sup>]</sup> 02:01, 20 September 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:01, 20 September 2013
Feel free to reverse my administrative actions; however, please let me know why you did it, especially if I made a mistake! |
Archive #1 (Oct 2010 to Nov 29, 2010) Archive #13 (Feb 1, 2012 to Mar 14, 2012) |
For grins
I just blocked two new accounts for socking. They were both creating articles about Italian mattress/bedding companies. I really wanted to file a report at SPI and request a CU for sleepers.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:44, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- We need something like this here.—Odysseus1479 01:37, 15 September 2013 (UTC) Edited 01:42, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) Hehehehehe. Yes we do! Bishonen | talk 12:25, 15 September 2013 (UTC).
- I can look, but what are the accounts? Reaper Eternal (talk) 11:38, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- It wasn't really a CU request - I just couldn't resist the pun. Since I posted this, though, I revoked talk page and disabled e-mail because of threats. The person claims he/she "will be back". If you want to look, the master is Silvia66 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log).--Bbb23 (talk) 12:16, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- ((talk page stalker) going on and on). @Bbb23: Not to be finicking, but had they posted anything bad on their talkpage? With tp access blocked, they can't request unblock. I agree unblocking them is a pretty academic question, but still. Isn't tp abuse supposed to be the only thing we remove tp access for? Bishonen | talk 12:42, 15 September 2013 (UTC).
- They can, of course, request unblocking through e-mail or a UTRS ticket. If I was justified disabling their e-mail (their e-mail were not pleasant), I decided it was useless to allow them talk page access. If you and Reaper think I should restore tp access, I will.--Bbb23 (talk) 12:52, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- ((talk page stalker) going on and on). @Bbb23: Not to be finicking, but had they posted anything bad on their talkpage? With tp access blocked, they can't request unblock. I agree unblocking them is a pretty academic question, but still. Isn't tp abuse supposed to be the only thing we remove tp access for? Bishonen | talk 12:42, 15 September 2013 (UTC).
- It wasn't really a CU request - I just couldn't resist the pun. Since I posted this, though, I revoked talk page and disabled e-mail because of threats. The person claims he/she "will be back". If you want to look, the master is Silvia66 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log).--Bbb23 (talk) 12:16, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- Artik88 (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- EdmondDantesOfMonteCristo (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- MartinaRoseti (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Mattia965 (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Miky765 (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Silvia66 (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
There's also several more accounts that I haven't listed due to their abusive usernames attacking the steward Vituzzu and a couple other editors. Reaper Eternal (talk) 16:40, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- Oh, and I wouldn't restore talkpage or email unless you want to be greeted with abusive unblock requests and insults. Reaper Eternal (talk) 16:48, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- Wow, thanks, Reaper. I've changed the tags on MartinaRoseti and Silvia66 to reflect the correct sock master.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:57, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Kana Nishino article
Hello, can I request to help rollback Kana Nishino's article at: http://en.wikipedia.org/Kana_Nishino all the way up till the point last made by "Whatcha know bout us"? The sales and records have been vandalized. I tried to revert back some but realized too much have been vandalized and I can't keep track.
Thanks in advance! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 183.90.103.173 (talk) 05:59, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- I've reverted it back. Actually, I have to revert in the same way you do given that people who edited on top of those dubious changes. You can go to the article's history, find the last good version, and click on the timestamp for that version in the history. This will open the page as it was at that point in time. You can then simply click "edit" and then "save page" to revert the article back to that revision. I hope this helps! Reaper Eternal (talk) 11:37, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
WikiProject Military history coordinator election
Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Kirill 16:46, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
User:Rinpoche socks question
Hi Reaper Eternal, thanks for blocking some of the sockpuppets at Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Rinpoche. I was curious why some of the Rinpoche socks have not been blocked - specifically User:Amanda Jane Mason (whose actions started the original SPI) and User:Elissa Rubria Honoria who "...is related to Rinpoche/the Amanda Jane Mason account." There is also User:TestTubeFiasco, who has not been checked that I can see, but sure passes the DUCK test to be a Rinpoche sock. I am an admin and can block them if that would help. Ruhrfisch ><>° 03:11, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
ANI - L'Origine du monde
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
I should sign this, apologies ~Charmlet 02:01, 20 September 2013 (UTC)