Welcome to the edit warring noticeboard
|
|
Click here to purge this page (For help, see Misplaced Pages:Purge)
|
Shortcuts
|
You must notify any user you report.
You may use {{subst:an3-notice}} to do so.
|
- When reporting a user here, your own behavior will also be scrutinized. Be sure you understand WP:REVERT and the definitions below first.
- Possible alternatives to filing here are dispute resolution, or a request for page protection.
- WP:1RR violations may also be brought here. Your report should include two reverts that occurred within a 24-hour period, and a link to where the 1RR restriction was imposed.
- A 3RR report helper tool was available, which assisted in diff gathering and reporting. Be sure to remove non-reverts from the report or it may be rejected.
|
Definition of edit warring
|
Edit warring is a behavior, typically exemplified by the use of confrontational edits to win a content dispute. It is different than a bold, revert, discuss (BRD) cycle. Reverting vandalism and banned users is not edit warring; at the same time, content disputes, even egregious point of view edits and other good-faith changes do not constitute vandalism. Administrators often must make a judgment call to identify edit warring when cooling disputes. Administrators currently use several measures to determine if a user is edit warring.
|
Definition of the three-revert rule (3RR)
|
An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Violations of the this rule normally attract blocks of at least 24 hours. Any appearance of gaming the system by reverting a fourth time just outside the 24-hour slot is likely to be treated as a 3RR violation. See here for exemptions.
|
| You can use Twinkle to report edit warring now, which will handle diffs for you automagically! |
Click here to create a new report
|