Misplaced Pages talk:Administrators' noticeboard: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 01:23, 24 September 2013 editBbb23 (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators270,198 edits →Images on ANI: this isn't even the ANI talk page← Previous edit		Revision as of 01:45, 24 September 2013 edit undoBbb23 (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators270,198 edits Undid revision 574262481 by Bbb23 (talk) - self-revert as pointed out by another smarter userNext edit →
Line 67:		Line 67:

	:{{done\|Crossposted}}. Sorry for the protection. ~] <sup>]</sup> 21:16, 23 September 2013 (UTC)		:{{done\|Crossposted}}. Sorry for the protection. ~] <sup>]</sup> 21:16, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

			==Images on ANI==
			Some editors appear to be enforcing an unstated iconoclastic policy. Why should ANI look so dull, and why should a modern multimedia encyclopædia be discussed in purely textual terms. A picture can be worth 1000 words!<span style="font-family:Edwardian Script ITC;font-size:20px"><b><font color="red">]</font></b></span> <sup>(<font color="blue">♥ ]♥ </font>)</sup> 00:54, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
			:As you've been told multiple times, ANI is not for content discussion. --] <sup><font face="Calibri">'']''</font></sup> 01:17, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:45, 24 September 2013

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Administrators' noticeboard page.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Shortcuts

This is not the page to report problems to administrators, or discuss administrative issues.

This page is for discussion of the Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard page (and some of its subpages, including /Incidents).

Report incidents such as block evasion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Report violations of the three-revert rule at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/3RR.
Discuss general issues at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard.
Report posting of personal information by following instructions at Misplaced Pages:Requests for oversight.
Request discussions need to be closed at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Requests for closure.

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 8 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 4 sections are present.

clean up at WP:MFD

Just so people know: I moved the MFD discussion for User:Hirnaxi karelia to July 25 (which was when it was actually created). For some reason it was placed under "January 1, 1970" at the bottom of everything. The nomination looks legitimate so I'm not sure what was going on. Mangoe (talk) 17:30, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

archiving cocked up?

The "request for sanction removal" section has been closed for days but has not been auto archived. There was some code preventing archiving but I removed it five days ago. Anyone got a clue what the problem is? Beeblebrox (talk) 20:58, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

It's all one big section, with subsections for proposals 2, 3, continuing discussion, and topic-ban violation, so your closure of the indef block is the last post. It should archive after 1800 on the 6th if we have 48 hour archiving. Van Isaac_{WS Vex} 00:29, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Oh...yeah... so it is. How silly of me. Beeblebrox (talk) 15:33, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Not silly at all. I was wondering the same thing when I was holding proposal 3 to get formally closed, and only figured out what was going on when I looked closer at how all the sections were organized. Van Isaac_{WS Vex} 04:07, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Inactive

Does someone want to look at my edit to User talk:Fram ? I didn't realize the admin was inactive when I posted it. I didn't want to bother any of the boards with it because I don't really know how it should be dealt with.--Canoe1967 (talk) 22:16, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages talk:Articles for creation/David Adam Kess is the article here and http://commons.wikimedia.org/Commons:Administrators%27_noticeboard/User_problems#Widespread_spamming_by_a_photographer is the discussion at commons. They claim that this photographer's images have been added to many articles at en:wp. It seems most edits are done by IPs. I haven't got a clue myself how to deal with it. There is also at least one red link category in the AfC that could probably use routine maintenance deletion.--Canoe1967 (talk) 20:21, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Comments requested before I implement consensus at WP:VisualEditor/Default State RFC

I tried to post my comments to the discussion but it seems IP's aren't welcome on this noticeboard so I'm posting here instead. Feel free to post it to the discussion or leave it here. The mere fact that the WMF is choosing to implement the VE application to a couple dozen more wiki's this month only shows they aren't listening. There are literally hundreds of bugs that need to be fixed. It still doesn't work at all with any version of internet explorer and multiple Wiki's are on the verge of a revolt. There is absolutely no possible good that can come out of continuing this implementation before a large group of the problems are fixed. 138.162.8.57 (talk) 20:47, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Crossposted. Sorry for the protection. ~Charmlet 21:16, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Images on ANI

Some editors appear to be enforcing an unstated iconoclastic policy. Why should ANI look so dull, and why should a modern multimedia encyclopædia be discussed in purely textual terms. A picture can be worth 1000 words!♥ L'Origine du monde ♥ 00:54, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

As you've been told multiple times, ANI is not for content discussion. --NeilN 01:17, 24 September 2013 (UTC)