| Revision as of 17:53, 25 September 2013 editSPECIFICO (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users35,510 edits →WP:Competence← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:09, 26 September 2013 edit undoSteeletrap (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users10,937 edits →WP:Competence: replyNext edit → | ||
| Line 65: | Line 65: | ||
| ] Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Misplaced Pages, as you did to ], without giving a valid reason for the removal in the ]. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been ]. Please make use of the ] if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-delete2 --> ''The reason you gave for removal here is not valid. My edit summary referenced the talk page, which in turn references the RSNs. Either way, the citations are under dispute. Readers who are not following notice boards may wish to comment, and the SPS tags properly serve to alert them. Also, the tags put the article into ]. Resolution of the dispute (on the talk page or RSN) is the only valid reasons for removing these templates. Please restore.'' – ] (]) 15:27, 22 September 2013 (UTC) | ] Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Misplaced Pages, as you did to ], without giving a valid reason for the removal in the ]. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been ]. Please make use of the ] if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-delete2 --> ''The reason you gave for removal here is not valid. My edit summary referenced the talk page, which in turn references the RSNs. Either way, the citations are under dispute. Readers who are not following notice boards may wish to comment, and the SPS tags properly serve to alert them. Also, the tags put the article into ]. Resolution of the dispute (on the talk page or RSN) is the only valid reasons for removing these templates. Please restore.'' – ] (]) 15:27, 22 September 2013 (UTC) | ||
| ::Srich you have been told not to post on my talk page. Do not post anything other than required notices on my talk page. Your template appears to refer to something from several days which has already been addressed on the article talk page and elsewhere. ]] 17:53, 25 September 2013 (UTC) | ::Srich you have been told not to post on my talk page. Do not post anything other than required notices on my talk page. Your template appears to refer to something from several days which has already been addressed on the article talk page and elsewhere. ]] 17:53, 25 September 2013 (UTC) | ||
| ::: I'd like to think that Rich's post was made for didactic purposes, ''as an example of incompetence'', given the section he posted it in. ] (]) 05:09, 26 September 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 05:09, 26 September 2013
| This is SPECIFICO's talk page, where you can send her messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22Auto-archiving period: 31 days  |
ANI notice
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
WP:ANI Notice
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
GA reassessment for Murray Rothbard article
Murray Rothbard, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.
Money creation
- Where does money come from? by Andrew Jackson,Richard Werner,Tony Greenham,Josh Ryan-Collins (12 December 2012) produced by the New Economics Foundation (NEF) based on documents supplied by the Bank of England, claims that the growth in money supply in the UK was based on commercial banks willingness to lend up to 2007 (before the start of the financial crisis), and that interest rates and the reserve requirement had little effect in restraining lending between 1997 and 2007. Banks increased their lending, and then sought the reserves afterwards.
What's not to like about this Specifico ? If you don't like it, don't just delete it, but say why. It was posted under alternatives and criticisms. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brandsby (talk • contribs) 13:27, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
- Please discuss this on the article talk page. You should be able to find a clearer and better-sourced discussion of content you feel is appropriate to add in this section. Please see this link WP:RS. Thanks. SPECIFICO talk 13:37, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
I think you are censoring this Specifico, when I have given a link to the contribution I make. I presume you are from the USA, so what is your experience of UK banking and money supply ? Likewise I am not qualified to speak about US banking. I am a new user to Wikepedia and I find the commenting quite clunky, but Misplaced Pages is supposed to reflect a variety of views (supported by research and evidence), not be subject to censorship which we might expect in other parts of the world like China or Syria. I would appreciate it if my contribution could remain on the page where it was, otherwise we might as well burn all the books as they did in Chairman Mao's China and keep people ignorant. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brandsby (talk • contribs) 14:35, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ludwig von Mises Institute, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Robert Murphy and Julian Sanchez (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:54, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
RSN notice
 | RSN re Callahan.blogspot.comPlease see: WP:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Gene-callahan.blogspot.com. |
– S. Rich (talk) 01:39, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
September 2013
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Hans-Hermann Hoppe. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware, Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 16:42, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ludwig von Mises Institute may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- had been a founder. At the time, Rockwell was chief of staff for U.S. Congressman Ron Paul.<ref> [http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1571/is_n5_v13/ai_19092301 Now
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:31, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ludwig von Mises may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- Institute, 1988, p. 25.</ref> In his ] '']'', Mises adopted ] as a general conceptual foundation of the social sciences and set forth his methodological
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:45, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
WP:Competence
Hello SPECIFICO. I want to tell you that I appreciate your insistence on raising questions of WP;Competence when appropriate. I think "are you competent"? is a very important question; one which every editor must ask her/himself. I am so happy that you feel the same way. Steeletrap (talk) 04:57, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- It is no coincidence that I posted this note of encouragement below an archetypal example of incompetence, or a preposterous misunderstanding of WP:3RR. I urge you to continue to call out incompetence when you see it. Steeletrap (talk) 05:01, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Misplaced Pages, as you did to Ludwig von Mises Institute, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. The reason you gave for removal here is not valid. My edit summary referenced the talk page, which in turn references the RSNs. Either way, the citations are under dispute. Readers who are not following notice boards may wish to comment, and the SPS tags properly serve to alert them. Also, the tags put the article into Category:Accuracy disputes. Resolution of the dispute (on the talk page or RSN) is the only valid reasons for removing these templates. Please restore. – S. Rich (talk) 15:27, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- Srich you have been told not to post on my talk page. Do not post anything other than required notices on my talk page. Your template appears to refer to something from several days which has already been addressed on the article talk page and elsewhere. SPECIFICO talk 17:53, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
- I'd like to think that Rich's post was made for didactic purposes, as an example of incompetence, given the section he posted it in. Steeletrap (talk) 05:09, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
- Srich you have been told not to post on my talk page. Do not post anything other than required notices on my talk page. Your template appears to refer to something from several days which has already been addressed on the article talk page and elsewhere. SPECIFICO talk 17:53, 25 September 2013 (UTC)