| Revision as of 03:02, 1 October 2013 view sourceSteeletrap (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users10,937 edits Undid revision 575234866 by Carolmooredc (talk) "libel" does not equate to accurately quoting an author. Please read the passage.← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:36, 1 October 2013 view source Binksternet (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers494,034 edits reworking covenant communities section to include more of Kinsella, more of Block, and to add Breunig of Demos (U.S. think tank). See Talk:Hans-Hermann Hoppe#The focus is on anti-democracy and also against free speechNext edit → | ||
| Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
| ], a colleague of Hoppe's at the ], asserts that Hoppe's arguments shed light "on historical occurrences, from wars to poverty to inflation to interest rates to crime". Block notes that while Hoppe concedes that 21st-century democracies are more prosperous than the monarchies of old, Hoppe argues that if nobles and kings replaced today's political leaders, their ability to take a long term view of a country's well-being would “improve matters.” Block also shared what he called minor criticisms of Hoppe’s theses regarding time preferences, immigration and the gap between libertarianism and conservatism.<ref>Walter Block, , ], Vol. 61, No. 3, July, 2002.</ref> | ], a colleague of Hoppe's at the ], asserts that Hoppe's arguments shed light "on historical occurrences, from wars to poverty to inflation to interest rates to crime". Block notes that while Hoppe concedes that 21st-century democracies are more prosperous than the monarchies of old, Hoppe argues that if nobles and kings replaced today's political leaders, their ability to take a long term view of a country's well-being would “improve matters.” Block also shared what he called minor criticisms of Hoppe’s theses regarding time preferences, immigration and the gap between libertarianism and conservatism.<ref>Walter Block, , ], Vol. 61, No. 3, July, 2002.</ref> | ||
| ===Intolerance in covenant communities=== | |||
| ===Physical removal of homosexuals and other groups from libertarian order=== | |||
| In his book Hoppe envisions that a fully libertarian society would have "covenant communities" made up of residents who have signed an agreement defining the nature of that community. Each community would be largely focused on the protection of property rights but it would likely incorporate political, religious or social restrictions. Communities would be formed under a wide variety of agreements, and intolerance would arise within a community against those who do not meet the restrictions. Hoppe pictured a libertarian world with warning signs at the edges of covenant towns saying "no beggars, bums, or homeless, but also no homosexuals, drug users, Jews, Moslems, Germans, or Zulus."<ref name=Hoppe211>Hoppe, Hans-Hermann (2001). ''Democracy: The God That Failed: The Economics and Politics of Monarchy, Democracy and Natural Order'', Transaction Publishers, p. 211. ISBN 1412815290</ref><ref>Block, Walter (2007). . Reason Papers.</ref> | |||
| Chief among the restrictions that Hoppe envisions for the covenant community is the banning of democracy and communism, which are both anathema to property rights.<ref name=Kinsella2010>] , ], 27 May 2010.</ref> Free speech would not be allowed to undermine the purpose of the community.<ref>Breunig, Matt (September 11, 2013). . Policyshop, ]. Retrieved October 1, 2013.</ref> Hoppe writes: | |||
| Regarding the "covenant entailed in a libertarian (proprietary) community" which he envisions, Hoppe wrote: | |||
| {{quote|In a covenant founded for the purpose of protecting family and kin, there can be no tolerance toward those habitually promoting |
{{quote|In a covenant concluded among proprietor and community tenants for the purpose of protecting their private property, no such thing as a right to free (unlimited) speech exists, not even to unlimited speech on one's own tenant-property. One may say innumerable things and promote almost any idea under the sun, but naturally no one is permitted to advocate ideas contrary to the very purpose of the covenant of preserving and protecting private property, such as democracy and communism. There can be no tolerance toward democrats and communists in a libertarian social order. They will have to be physically separated and expelled from society. Likewise, in a covenant founded for the purpose of protecting family and kin, there can be no tolerance toward those habitually promoting lifestyles incompatible with this goal. They—the advocates of alternative, non-family and kin-centered lifestyles such as, for instance, individual hedonism, parasitism, nature-environment worship, homosexuality, or communism—will have to be physically removed from society, too, if one is to maintain a libertarian order.<ref>Hoppe, ''Democracy: The God That Failed'', </ref>}} | ||
| Commenting on this passage, Martin Snyder of the ] said Hoppe's words will disturb "hose with a better memory than Hoppe for segregation, apartheid, internment facilities and concentration camps, for yellow stars and pink triangles".<ref name="Snyder"/> ] wrote that Hoppe's comment calling for "homosexuals and others to be banned from polite society" was "exceedingly difficult to reconcile |
Commenting on this passage, Martin Snyder of the ] said Hoppe's words will disturb "hose with a better memory than Hoppe for segregation, apartheid, internment facilities and concentration camps, for yellow stars and pink triangles".<ref name="Snyder"/> ] wrote that Hoppe's comment calling for "homosexuals and others to be banned from polite society" was "exceedingly difficult to reconcile... with libertarianism" because "the libertarian philosophy would support the rights of both groups to act in such manners". He continues: "As for homosexuality, it is entirely possible that some areas of the country, parts of Gotham and San Francisco for example, will require this practice, and ban, entirely, heterosexuality. If this is done through contract, private property rights, restrictive covenants, it will be entirely compatible with the libertarian legal code."<ref>] (]), , undated, published at ] website, p. 22-23.</ref> | ||
| ] said that Hoppe's critics have accused Hoppe of "homophobia, bigotry, and the like" based on these passages. He said that Hoppe's discussion of "physically removing" homosexuals and other groups only applied to "private, covenant-based communities" centered around traditional values. |
] said that Hoppe's critics have accused Hoppe of "homophobia, bigotry, and the like" based on these passages, but that Hoppe is not a homophobe. He said that Hoppe's discussion of "physically removing" homosexuals and other groups only applied to "private, covenant-based communities" centered around traditional values. Kinsella cites Hoppe writing that in covenant communities, "true diversity would reign, in accordance with the preferences of each community."<ref name=Kinsella2010/> | ||
| ==Views on immigration== | ==Views on immigration== | ||
Revision as of 05:36, 1 October 2013
| Hans-Hermann Hoppe | |
|---|---|
 Hans-Hermann Hoppe | |
| Born | (1949-09-02) September 2, 1949 (age 75) Peine, West Germany |
| Nationality | German American |
| Academic career | |
| Field | Austrian Economics, Political Philosophy |
| Institution | University of Nevada, Las Vegas |
| School or tradition | Austrian School |
| Alma mater | Goethe University Frankfurt |
| Influences | Ludwig von Mises Murray Rothbard Jürgen Habermas Karl-Otto Apel Eugen von Böhm-Bawerk Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn |
| Contributions | Argumentation ethics, Analysis of democracy and public goods theory, Property and Freedom Society |
| Awards | The Frank T. and Harriet Kurzweg Award (2004) The Gary G. Schlarbaum Prize (2006) Franz Cuhel Memorial Prize (2009) |
Hans-Hermann Hoppe (German: [ˈhɔpə]; born September 2, 1949) is a German-born American academic, libertarian theorist and an Austrian School economist. He is Professor Emeritus with the College of Business at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, and currently resides in Istanbul, Turkey. He has written several books and his writings have been translated into several foreign languages. His employer, Llewellyn Rockwell, paid homage to Hoppe in a festschrift published by Rockwell's von Mises Institute. Rockwell wrote that the "Hoppean effect — that sense of having been profoundly enlightened by a completely new way of understanding something — has happened many times over the years." Hoppe's views have repeatedly generated controversy among his colleagues.
Life and work
Hoppe was born in Peine, West Germany, did undergraduate studies at Universität des Saarlandes and received his MA and PhD degrees from Goethe University, Frankfurt. He was a post-doctoral fellow at the University of Michigan, in Ann Arbor, from 1976 to 1978 and earned his habilitation in Foundations of Sociology and Economics from the University of Frankfurt in 1981. In 1986, after a succession of teaching jobs in Europe, he moved from Germany to the United States, where he was associated with Murray Rothbard until the latter's death in January 1995. Hoppe was a Professor in the School of Business at University of Nevada, Las Vegas, until his retirement in 2008.
Hoppe's economic and political views were profoundly influenced by Rothbard, whom Hoppe has called his "principal teacher, mentor and master". He currently serves as Distinguished Fellow of the Ludwig von Mises Institute, which has published much of his work. He has also served as editor of various Mises Institute periodicals. Hoppe is married to Margaret Hoppe.
Property and Freedom Society
Main article: Property and Freedom SocietyIn 2006, Hoppe founded The Property & Freedom Society ("PFS") as a reaction against the Mont Pelerin Society, which he has derided as "socialist." Hoppe stated that individuals, whom he did not identify, had been "skeptical concerning the Mont Pelerin Society from the beginning" in 1947. Hoppe stated that Ludwig von Mises, had doubted whether "a society filled with certified state-interventionists" could pursue libertarian ideals. On the fifth anniversary of PFS, Hoppe reflected on its goals:
On the one hand, positively, it was to explain and elucidate the legal, economic, cognitive and cultural requirements and features of a free, state-less natural order.
On the other hand, negatively, it was to unmask the State and showcase it for what it really is: an institution run by gangs of murderers, plunderers and thieves, surrounded by willing executioners, propagandists, sycophants, crooks, liars, clowns, charlatans, dupes and useful idiots — an institution that dirties and taints everything it touches.
Argumentation ethics
Main article: Argumentation ethicsIn the September 1988 issue of Liberty, Hoppe attempted to establish an a priori and value-neutral justification for libertarian ethics by devising a new theory which he named argumentation ethics. Hoppe's scheme asserts that any argument which in any respect purports to contradict libertarian principles is logically incoherent. In the following issue, Liberty published comments by ten of Hoppe's fellow libertarians, followed by a rejoinder from Hoppe. In his comment, Hoppe's friend and Mises Institute colleague Murray Rothbard wrote that Hoppe's theory was "a dazzling breakthrough for political philosophy in general and for libertarianism in particular" and that Hoppe, "has managed to transcend the famous is/ought, fact/value dichotomy that has plagued philosophy since the days of the Scholastics, and that had brought modern libertarianism into a tiresome deadlock". In his comments, Hoppe derided the most vehement of his critics as "utilitarians".
Philosopher Roderick T. Long, who, like Hoppe, is a Mises Institute Senior Fellow, states that Hoppe's a priori formulation of libertarianism denies the fundamental principle of Misesean praxeology, namely, that human action can only be understood as the expression of the specific goals, intentions, and purposes which motivate individual choice. On the issue of utilitarianism, Long writes, "Hoppe’s argument, if it worked, would commit us to recognizing and respecting libertarian rights regardless of what our goals are – but as a praxeologist, I have trouble seeing how any practical requirement can be justified apart from a means-end structure."
Democracy: The God That Failed
| Part of a series on the |
| Austrian School |
|---|
 |
| Principal works |
| Origins |
| Theories and ideologies |
| Organizations, universities, and think tanks |
| People |
| Variants and related topics |
 Business and economics portal |
In 2001, Hoppe published Democracy: The God That Failed which examines various social and economic phenomena which, Hoppe argues, are problems caused by democratic forms of government. He attributes Democracy's alleged failures to pressure groups which seek to increase government expenditures and regulations. Hoppe proposes alternatives and remedies, including secession, decentralization of government, and "complete freedom of contract, occupation, trade and migration".
Hoppe argues that monarchy would preserve individual liberty more effectively than democracy. He also states that if the king regards the government as his “personal possession” he will be careful to manage its resources in a manner which he believes will pass on the greatest available value to his heirs. Hoppe writes that to increase the value of his personal property (the state), the king would keep taxes low because Hoppe believes the king will think that "the lower the degree of taxation, the more productive the subject population will be, and the more productive the population, the higher the value of the ruler’s parasitic monopoly of expropriation will be.”
In 2013, Hoppe reflected on the relationship between democracy and the arts: "In the field of the arts and of aesthetic judgment, democracy leads to the subversion and ultimately disappearance of the notion of beauty and universal standards of beauty. Beauty is swamped and submerged by so-called "modern art."
Walter Block, a colleague of Hoppe's at the Ludwig Von Mises Institute, asserts that Hoppe's arguments shed light "on historical occurrences, from wars to poverty to inflation to interest rates to crime". Block notes that while Hoppe concedes that 21st-century democracies are more prosperous than the monarchies of old, Hoppe argues that if nobles and kings replaced today's political leaders, their ability to take a long term view of a country's well-being would “improve matters.” Block also shared what he called minor criticisms of Hoppe’s theses regarding time preferences, immigration and the gap between libertarianism and conservatism.
Intolerance in covenant communities
In his book Hoppe envisions that a fully libertarian society would have "covenant communities" made up of residents who have signed an agreement defining the nature of that community. Each community would be largely focused on the protection of property rights but it would likely incorporate political, religious or social restrictions. Communities would be formed under a wide variety of agreements, and intolerance would arise within a community against those who do not meet the restrictions. Hoppe pictured a libertarian world with warning signs at the edges of covenant towns saying "no beggars, bums, or homeless, but also no homosexuals, drug users, Jews, Moslems, Germans, or Zulus."
Chief among the restrictions that Hoppe envisions for the covenant community is the banning of democracy and communism, which are both anathema to property rights. Free speech would not be allowed to undermine the purpose of the community. Hoppe writes:
In a covenant concluded among proprietor and community tenants for the purpose of protecting their private property, no such thing as a right to free (unlimited) speech exists, not even to unlimited speech on one's own tenant-property. One may say innumerable things and promote almost any idea under the sun, but naturally no one is permitted to advocate ideas contrary to the very purpose of the covenant of preserving and protecting private property, such as democracy and communism. There can be no tolerance toward democrats and communists in a libertarian social order. They will have to be physically separated and expelled from society. Likewise, in a covenant founded for the purpose of protecting family and kin, there can be no tolerance toward those habitually promoting lifestyles incompatible with this goal. They—the advocates of alternative, non-family and kin-centered lifestyles such as, for instance, individual hedonism, parasitism, nature-environment worship, homosexuality, or communism—will have to be physically removed from society, too, if one is to maintain a libertarian order.
Commenting on this passage, Martin Snyder of the American Association of University Professors said Hoppe's words will disturb "hose with a better memory than Hoppe for segregation, apartheid, internment facilities and concentration camps, for yellow stars and pink triangles". Walter Block wrote that Hoppe's comment calling for "homosexuals and others to be banned from polite society" was "exceedingly difficult to reconcile... with libertarianism" because "the libertarian philosophy would support the rights of both groups to act in such manners". He continues: "As for homosexuality, it is entirely possible that some areas of the country, parts of Gotham and San Francisco for example, will require this practice, and ban, entirely, heterosexuality. If this is done through contract, private property rights, restrictive covenants, it will be entirely compatible with the libertarian legal code."
Stephan Kinsella said that Hoppe's critics have accused Hoppe of "homophobia, bigotry, and the like" based on these passages, but that Hoppe is not a homophobe. He said that Hoppe's discussion of "physically removing" homosexuals and other groups only applied to "private, covenant-based communities" centered around traditional values. Kinsella cites Hoppe writing that in covenant communities, "true diversity would reign, in accordance with the preferences of each community."
Views on immigration
An anarchist who favors abolishing the nation-state, Hoppe believes that as long as states exist, they should impose some restrictions on immigration. Hoppe has equated free immigration to "forced integration" which violates the rights of native peoples, since if land were privately owned, immigration would not be unhindered but would only occur with the consent of private property owners. Hoppe's Mises Institute colleague Walter Block has characterized Hoppe as an "anti-open immigration activist" who argues that, though all public property is "stolen" by the state from taxpayers, "the state compounds the injustice when it allows immigrants to use property, thus further “invading” the private property rights of the original owners." However, Block rejects Hoppe's views as incompatible with libertarianism. Employing a reductio ad absurdum argument, he argued that Hoppe's logic implies that flagrantly unlibertarian laws such as regulations on prostitution and drug use "could be defended on the basis that many tax-paying property owners would not want such behavior on their own private property".
In terms of specific immigration restrictions, Hoppe argued that an appropriate policy will require immigrants to the United States to display proficiency in English in addition to "superior (above-average) intellectual performance and character structure as well as a compatible system of values". These requirements will, he argued, result in a "systematic pro-European immigration bias". Jacob Hornberger of the Future of Freedom Foundation opined that the immigration test Hoppe advocated would probably be prejudiced against Latin American immigrants to the United States.
Controversy over remarks about homosexuals and academic freedom
Following a March 4, 2004 lecture on time preference at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas (UNLV), a student complained that Hoppe created a hostile classroom environment by stating that homosexuals tend to be more shortsighted than heterosexuals in their ability to save money and plan (economically) for the future, in part because they tend not to have children. Hoppe also suggested that John Maynard Keynes' reputed homosexuality might explain his economic views. Hoppe also stated that very young and very old people, and couples without children, were less likely to plan for the future. Hoppe told a reporter that the comments lasted only 90 seconds of a 75 minute class, no students questioned the comments in that class, and that in 18 years of giving the same lecture all over the world, he had never previously received a complaint about it. At the request of university officials, Hoppe apologized to the class. He said, "Italians tend to eat more spaghetti than Germans, and Germans tend to eat more sauerkraut than Italians" and explained that he was speaking in generalities. Thereafter, Hoppe told the reporter, the student alleged that Hoppe did not take the complaint seriously and filed a formal complaint. Hoppe told the reporter that he felt as if it were he who was the victim in the incident and that the student should have been told to "grow up".
An investigation was conducted and the university's provost, Raymond W. Alden III, issued Hoppe a non-disciplinary letter of instruction on February 9, 2005, with a finding that he had "created a hostile or intimidating educational environment in violation of the University's policies regarding discrimination as to sexual orientation." Alden also instructed Hoppe to "...cease mischaracterizing opinion as objective fact", asserted that Hoppe's opinion was not supported by peer-reviewed academic literature, and remarked that Hoppe had "refus to substantiate in-class statements of fact...."
Hoppe appealed the decision, saying the university had "blatantly violated its contractual obligations" toward him and described the action as "frivolous interference with my right to academic freedom". He was represented by the American Civil Liberties Union. The ACLU threatened legal action. ACLU attorney Allen Lichtenstein said "The charge against professor Hoppe is totally specious and without merit". The Nevada ACLU executive director said "We don't subscribe to Hans' theories and certainly understand why some students find them offensive....But academic freedom means nothing if it doesn't protect the right of professors to present scholarly ideas that are relevant to their curricula, even if they are controversial and rub people the wrong way". Alden's decision was picked up by Fox News and several blogs and libertarians organized a campaign to contact the university. The university received two weeks of bad publicity and the Interim Chancellor (Nevada System of Higher Education) Jim Rogers expressed concerns about "any attempts to thwart free speech."
Jim Rogers intervened in the matter. He rejected Hoppe's request for a one-year paid sabbatical, and UNLV President UNLV Carol Harter acted upon Hoppe's appeal on February 18, 2005. She decided that Hoppe's views, even if non-mainstream or controversial, should not be cause for reprimanding him. She dismissed the discrimination complaint against Hoppe and the non-disciplinary letter was withdrawn from Hoppe's personnel file. She wrote:
UNLV, in accordance with policy adopted by the Board of Regents, understands that the freedom afforded to Professor Hoppe and to all members of the academic community carries a significant corresponding academic responsibility. In the balance between freedoms and responsibilities, and where there may be ambiguity between the two, academic freedom must, in the end, be foremost.
Hoppe later wrote about the incident and the UNLV investigation in an article entitled "My Battle With the Thought Police". Martin Snyder of the American Association of University Professors wrote that he should not be "punished for freely expressing his opinions."
Various ontroversies about academic freedom, including the Hoppe matter and remarks made by Harvard University President Lawrence Summers, prompted the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, to hold a conference on academic freedom in October 2005. In 2009 UNLV proposed a new policy that included the encouragement of reporting by people who felt that they had encountered bias. The proposed policy was criticized by the Nevada ACLU and some faculty members who remembered the Hoppe incident as adverse to academic freedom.
Selected works
Books
- Handeln und Erkennen (Bern, 1976) ISBN 978-3261019004 OCLC 2544452
- Kritik der kausalwissenschaftlichen Sozialforschung (Westdeutscher Verlag, 1983) ISBN 978-3531116242 OCLC 10432202
- Eigentum, Anarchie und Staat (Westdeutscher Verlag, 1987) ISBN 978-3531118116 OCLC 18226538
- A Theory of Socialism and Capitalism (Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1989) ISBN 0-89838-279-3. (Full Text in PDF format)
- Economic Science and the Austrian Method (Ludwig von Mises Institute, 1995) ISBN 0-945466-20-X. (Full Text in PDF format)
- Democracy: The God That Failed: the economics and politics of monarchy, democracy and natural order. (Transaction Publishers, 2001) ISBN 0-7658-0868-4 OCLC 46384089
- The Economics and Ethics of Private Property (2nd edition, Ludwig von Mises Institute, 2006) ISBN 0-945466-40-4
- Editor and contributor: The Myth of National Defense. Essays on the Theory and History of Security Production (Ludwig von Mises Institute, October 2003) ISBN 978-0945466376 OCLC 53401048. (Full Text in PDF format) Includes writings by L.M. Bassani, C. Lottieri, M.N. Rothbard, E. von Kuehnelt-Leddihn, B. Lemennicier, G. Radnitsky, J.R. Stromberg, L.J. Sechrest, J.R. Hummel, W. Block and J.G. Hulsmann.
Articles
- Full text of Hoppe's 1998 introduction to The Ethics of Liberty by Murray Rothbard (also in PDF format)
- Hoppe, Hans-Hermann (1988). "On the Ultimate Justification of the Ethics of Private Property" (PDF). Liberty. 2 (1): 20–22.
{{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter|month=ignored (help) - Hoppe, Hans-Hermann. "In Defense of Extreme Rationalism: Thoughts on D. McCloskey's The Rhetoric of Economics" (PDF).
{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires|journal=(help) - Hoppe, Hans-Hermann (1988). "Symposium: Breakthrough or Buncombe?" (PDF). Liberty. 2 (2): 44–54.
{{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter|coauthors=ignored (|author=suggested) (help); Unknown parameter|month=ignored (help) - Hoppe, Hans-Hermann (1996). "Small is Beautiful and Efficient: The Case for Secession". Telos. 107.
{{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter|month=ignored (help) - Hoppe, Hans-Hermann (April 12, 2005). "My Battle with the Thought Police". Ludwig von Mies Institute.
References
- "The Gary G. Schlarbaum Prize". Mises Institute Awards. Ludwig von Mises Institute.
- ^ Wile, Anthony (March 27, 2011). "Dr. Hans-Hermann Hoppe on the Impracticality of One-World Government and the Failure of Western-style Democracy". The Daily Bell.
- Peter J. Boettke, Calculation and Coordination: Essays on Socialism and Transitional Political Economy Routledge Foundations of the Market Economy, Routledge, 2002, p. 295, ISBN 0203469682, 9780203469682
- Stephen Hunt Davis, Research and practice in education: the search for common ground, Rowman & Littlefield, 2008, p. 49, ISBN 1578868408, 9781578868407
- Steven Yates, Hans-Hermann Hoppe's Austrian Philosophy, Reason Papers: A Journal of Interdisciplinary Normative Studies, Issue 21, Fall 1996, p. 91.
- Block, Walter (1996). "Review of Hans-Hermann Hoppe, The Economics and Ethics of Private Property". Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines. 7 (1). doi:10.2202/1145-6396.1205.
In the pantheon of Austrian-libertarians, first there was Mises... These two are truly 'hard acts to follow'. But with the publication of The Economics and Ethics Private Property, Hoppe bids fair to one day claiming the mantle of worthy successor to these two pathbreaking thinkers.
{{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter|month=ignored (help) link to paper - ^ "UNLV Catalog" (PDF). p. 47. Retrieved 19 April 2013.
- Translations at Hanshoppe.com.
- Hulsmann and Kinsella (2009). Property, Freedom and Society: Essays in Honor of Hans-Hermann Hoppe. Alabalma: von Mises Institute.
- Jeff Tucker interviews Hans-Hermann Hoppe (1 October 2011)
- "Juan Ramón Rallo interviews Mises Institute scholar Hans-Hermann Hoppe at the Instituto Juan de Mariana's".
- Hans Herman Hoppe, The Ethics and Economics of Private Property, Second Edition, Ludwig von Mises Institute, p. xii, ISBN 13: 978-0-945466-40-6 ISBN 10: 0-945466-40-4.
- Belien, Paul. "The Property and Freedom Society: Standing Athwart History, Yelling Stop". Brussels Journal. Retrieved 6 September 2013.
- Hoppe, Herr Hans Hermann. "The Property And Freedom Society — Reflections After Five Years". lewrockwell.com. Retrieved 6 September 2013.
- Hoppe, Hans-Hermann (1988). "The Ultimate Justification of the Private Property Ethic" (PDF). Liberty. 2 (1): 20–22. PMC .pdf.
The mere fact that an individual argues presupposes that he owns himself and has a right to his own life and property. This provides a basis for libertarian theory radically different from both natural rights theory and utilitarianism.
{{cite journal}}: Check|pmc=value (help); Unknown parameter|month=ignored (help) - ^ Symposium: Breakthrough or Buncombe? with comments from Murray Rothbard, David D. Friedman, Leland B. Yeager, David Gordon and Douglas B. Rasmussen and from Hans-Hermann Hoppe.(Liberty, November 1988)
- Hans-Hermann Hoppe's Argumentation Ethic: A Critique, Robert Murphy and Gene Callahan. Relevant text on Page 3: "Therefore, concludes that the libertarian view of property rights is the only one that can possibly be defended by rational argument."
- Symposium (1988). "Hans-Hermannn Hoppe's Argumentation Ethics: Breakthrough or Buncombe?" (PDF). Liberty. 2 (2): 44–54. PMC .pdf.
{{cite journal}}: Check|pmc=value (help); Unknown parameter|month=ignored (help) - Long, Roderick T. "The Hoppriori Argument". Retrieved 26 August 2013.
- R.M. Pearce, Book Review: Democracy: the God That Failed, National Observer (Australia), No. 56, Autumn 2003.
- David Gordon, Review of Hans-Hermann Hoppe, Democracy: The God that Failed, "The Mises Review" of Ludwig von Mises Institute, Volume 8, Number 1, Spring 2002; Volume 8, Number 1.
- Fonseca, Joel (August 1, 2013). "The Brazilian Philosophy Magazine Dicta & Contradicta Interviews Hans-Hermann Hoppe." Mises Institute Brazil
- Walter Block, Review of Democracy: The God that Failed: The Economics and Politics of Monarchy, Democracy, and Natural Order, The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Vol. 61, No. 3, July, 2002.
- Hoppe, Hans-Hermann (2001). Democracy: The God That Failed: The Economics and Politics of Monarchy, Democracy and Natural Order, Transaction Publishers, p. 211. ISBN 1412815290
- Block, Walter (2007). "Plumb-Line Libertarianism: A Critique of Hoppe". Reason Papers.
- ^ Stephan Kinsella Hoppe on Covenant Communities and Advocates of Alternative Lifestyles, LewRockwell.com, 27 May 2010.
- Breunig, Matt (September 11, 2013). "Hans-Hermann Hoppe, Libertarian Extraordinaire". Policyshop, Demos. Retrieved October 1, 2013.
- Hoppe, Democracy: The God That Failed, pp. 216-218
- ^ Snyder, Martin D. (March 1, 2005). "Birds of a Feather?". Academe. American Association of University Professors. Retrieved April 17, 2013, from HighBeam Research.
{{cite journal}}: Check date values in:|accessdate=(help) - Walter Block (Loyola University New Orleans), "Libertarianism is unique; it belongs neither to the right nor the left: a critique of the views of Long, Holcombe, and Baden on the left, Hoppe, Feser and Paul on the right", undated, published at Ludwig von Mises Institute website, p. 22-23.
- Hans Hoppe,On Free Immigration and Forced Integration, LewRockwell.com, 1999.
- Anthony Gregory and Walter Block On Immigration: Reply to Hoppe, Journal of Libertarian Studies, Volume 21, No. 3, Fall 2007, 25–42
- Walter Block and Gene Callahan, Is There a Right to Immigration?: A Libertarian Perspective, Human Rights Review, October–December 2003.
- Jacob Hornberger, Let’s Stick with Traditional American Values!, The Future of Freedom Foundation, February 1, 2000.
- Snyder, Martin. "Birds of a Feather?". Academe. Vol. 91, no. 2. p. 127. ISSN 0190-2946.
So what ignited the controversy in Nevada? In March 2004, a student formally accused Hoppe of creating a hostile classroom environment during a lecture on time preference, a notion in economics identifying individuals' varying degrees of willingness to defer the immediate consumption of goods in favor of saving and investment. Hoppe opined that certain demographic groups, for instance homosexuals, tend to be more shortsighted in their economic outlook than those who have children.
- Snyder, Martin. "Birds of a Feather?". Academe. Vol. 91, no. 2. p. 127. ISSN 0190-2946.
He also suggested that the economic theories of John Maynard Keynes might be explained by Keynes's reputed homosexuality.
- ^ Richard Lake, UNLV accused of limiting free speech, Las Vegas Review-Journal, February 05, 2005.
- Alden, III, Raymond W. (February 9, 2005). "Findings and non-disciplinary letter of instruction" (PDF).
- Justin Chomintra, Professor, ACLU may sue UNLV, The Rebel Yell, February 10, 2005; reprinted by Stephen Kinsella at Mises.org, February 10, 2005.
- ^ "Efforts to punish UNLV professor gains exposure". Las Vegas Sun. February 8, 2005. Retrieved May 23, 2013.
- "Exoneration sought for UNLV professor". Las Vegas Sun. February 21, 2005. Retrieved May 23, 2013.
- "Rogers nixes Hoppe sabbatical". Las Vegas Sun. February 23, 2005. Retrieved May 23, 2013.
- Carol Harter (February 18, 2005). "Statement of Dr. Carol Harter, President of UNLV, regarding Professor Hans-Hermann Hoppe" (PDF).
- Hans-Hermann Hoppe, "My Battle With the Thought Police", Ludwig von Mises Institute web site, April 12, 2005.
- The role of academic tenure was included during the conference. "Teachers' tenure on front burner". Las Vegas Sun. October 13, 2005. Retrieved May 23, 2013.
- ^ The proposed policy defined “bias incidents” as “'verbal, written, or physical acts of intimidation, coercion, interference, frivolous claims, discrimination, and sexual or other harassment motivated, in whole or in part, by bias” based on characteristics including actual or perceived race, religion, sex (including gender identity or gender expression or a pregnancy-related condition), physical appearance and political affiliation.'" Hsu, Charlotte (April 25, 2009). "ACLU airs free speech concerns on bias policy: Faculty express concern; UNLV official says proposal would encourage expression". Las Vegas Sun. Retrieved May 23, 2013.
- Policy on Bias Incidents and Hate Crimes (Final draft), University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Office of the Vice President for Student Affairs, Department of Police Services, Office of the Vice President for Diversity and Inclusion Policy on Bias Incidents and Hate Crimes.
Further reading
- "UNLV provost defends stance in Hoppe case". Las Vegas Sun. March 9, 2005.
- Leake, Eric (March 1, 2005). "Former student pushes for action against professor". Las Vegas Sun.
External links
- Hans-Hermann Hoppe homepage
- Hans-Hermann Hoppe, The Mises Institute
- Property, Freedom, and Society – Festschrift (essays honoring Hoppe from the Mises Institute)
- The Property & Freedom Society
- Hoppe's archives at LewRockwell.com
- 1949 births
- Living people
- People from Peine (district)
- Saarland University alumni
- Goethe University Frankfurt alumni
- American anarchists
- American libertarians
- Anarchist academics
- Anarchism theorists
- Anarcho-capitalists
- Austrian School economists
- German economists
- German anarchists
- German libertarians
- German emigrants to the United States
- Libertarian economists
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas faculty