| Revision as of 08:58, 1 October 2013 view sourceObozedalteima (talk | contribs)131 editsm →Hello← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:27, 1 October 2013 view source PBS (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled116,854 editsm →Warning 3RR and "Topics related to the Balkans, broadly interpreted, are placed under discretionary sanctions"Next edit → | ||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| I notice - you are edit warring at many articles, Please stop, use the article talk page to gain consensus. <span style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;">]]</span> 19:17, 30 September 2013 (UTC) | I notice - you are edit warring at many articles, Please stop, use the article talk page to gain consensus. <span style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;">]]</span> 19:17, 30 September 2013 (UTC) | ||
| == Warning 3RR and "Topics related to the Balkans, broadly interpreted, are placed under discretionary sanctions" == | |||
| I noticed that you have to this page by which ] informed you that your account has been blocked for 12 hours instead of requesting that the block be lifted. This is within policy, but please read ]. | |||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. | |||
| To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> | |||
| Also be aware that articles like ] fall under ] restrictions see: | |||
| * ] ]: "Topics related to the Balkans, broadly interpreted, are placed under discretionary sanctions" | |||
| * ] ]: "Articles which relate to Eastern Europe, broadly interpreted, are placed under discretionary sanctions." | |||
| You have been warned. -- ] (]) 10:26, 1 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 10:27, 1 October 2013
Hello
Why have you put so many tags on articles? What's the problem? If you think there's a serious neutrality problem, it would be a good idea to discuss it on the article's talkpage. bobrayner (talk) 07:19, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Edit War
I notice - you are edit warring at many articles, Please stop, use the article talk page to gain consensus. A m i t 웃 19:17, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Warning 3RR and "Topics related to the Balkans, broadly interpreted, are placed under discretionary sanctions"
I noticed that you have removed the edit to this page by which Joy informed you that your account has been blocked for 12 hours instead of requesting that the block be lifted. This is within policy, but please read WP:BLANKING.
Your recent editing history at Ethnic cleansing in the Bosnian War shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Also be aware that articles like Ethnic cleansing in the Bosnian War fall under Arbcom restrictions see:
Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Macedonia#Standard discretionary sanctions: "Topics related to the Balkans, broadly interpreted, are placed under discretionary sanctions"- Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Eastern Europe#Standard discretionary sanctions: "Articles which relate to Eastern Europe, broadly interpreted, are placed under discretionary sanctions."
You have been warned. -- PBS (talk) 10:26, 1 October 2013 (UTC)