| Revision as of 14:30, 9 October 2013 editBlurred Lines (talk | contribs)5,671 editsm Reverted 1 edit by Hayleydc (talk) to last revision by Blurred Lines. (TW)← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:12, 9 October 2013 edit undoHolfordBot (talk | contribs)8 edits →Spam: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
| I see above a speedy nomination that you did being declined and I think "Untitled" relates to another. If you look at ] you will see three image deletion nominations of yours being declined: ], ] and ]. Note my comment re Lionel Fanthorpe - I do not want to see any of these massive Google URLs such as appear in <span class="plainlinks"></span>. All I want to see is: "copyvio of as used in ". Please be more careful about speedy nominations in future. — ] (] '''·''' ]) 10:13, 9 October 2013 (UTC) | I see above a speedy nomination that you did being declined and I think "Untitled" relates to another. If you look at ] you will see three image deletion nominations of yours being declined: ], ] and ]. Note my comment re Lionel Fanthorpe - I do not want to see any of these massive Google URLs such as appear in <span class="plainlinks"></span>. All I want to see is: "copyvio of as used in ". Please be more careful about speedy nominations in future. — ] (] '''·''' ]) 10:13, 9 October 2013 (UTC) | ||
| :Sir/Madam, if you don't want to see a Google website as proof of a copyright infringement, please don't bother judging it, because previously, other administrators just looks at the link, and deletes it, doesn't even go to my talk page and make a unnecessary complaint. As you may not know, I have been doing this for months now with Google and other sources, and never received a complaint about it. You being the only one is ridiculous, which means that your being unsupportive of what I do, and that's just sad. --<small><small><span style="border:1px solid black; background-color: #EFCA37; background-image: -ms-radial-gradient(center top, circle closest-side, #FFAA3B 0%, #E3B536 0%, #EFCA37 100%); background-image: -moz-radial-gradient(center top, circle closest-side, #FFAA3B 0%, #E3B536 0%, #EFCA37 100%); background-image: -o-radial-gradient(center top, circle closest-side, #FFAA3B 0%, #E3B536 0%, #EFCA37 100%); background-image: -webkit-gradient(radial, center top, 0, center top, 0, color-stop(0, #FFAA3B), color-stop(0, #E3B536), color-stop(1, #EFCA37)); background-image: -webkit-radial-gradient(center top, circle closest-side, #FFAA3B 0%, #E3B536 0%, #EFCA37 100%); background-image: radial-gradient(circle closest-side at center top, #FFAA3B 0%, #E3B536 0%, #EFCA37 100%);padding:4px;">] ]</span></small></small> 14:02, 9 October 2013 (UTC) | :Sir/Madam, if you don't want to see a Google website as proof of a copyright infringement, please don't bother judging it, because previously, other administrators just looks at the link, and deletes it, doesn't even go to my talk page and make a unnecessary complaint. As you may not know, I have been doing this for months now with Google and other sources, and never received a complaint about it. You being the only one is ridiculous, which means that your being unsupportive of what I do, and that's just sad. --<small><small><span style="border:1px solid black; background-color: #EFCA37; background-image: -ms-radial-gradient(center top, circle closest-side, #FFAA3B 0%, #E3B536 0%, #EFCA37 100%); background-image: -moz-radial-gradient(center top, circle closest-side, #FFAA3B 0%, #E3B536 0%, #EFCA37 100%); background-image: -o-radial-gradient(center top, circle closest-side, #FFAA3B 0%, #E3B536 0%, #EFCA37 100%); background-image: -webkit-gradient(radial, center top, 0, center top, 0, color-stop(0, #FFAA3B), color-stop(0, #E3B536), color-stop(1, #EFCA37)); background-image: -webkit-radial-gradient(center top, circle closest-side, #FFAA3B 0%, #E3B536 0%, #EFCA37 100%); background-image: radial-gradient(circle closest-side at center top, #FFAA3B 0%, #E3B536 0%, #EFCA37 100%);padding:4px;">] ]</span></small></small> 14:02, 9 October 2013 (UTC) | ||
| == Spam == | |||
| Please do not add advertising or inappropriate external links to Misplaced Pages{{#if:|, as you did in ]}}. ] nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See ] and ] for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the {{#if:|]|article's talk page}} rather than re-adding it. See the ] to learn more about Misplaced Pages. Thank you.]<!-- Template:Spam -->. This message was sent by an automated bot. --] (]) 16:12, 9 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:12, 9 October 2013
Speedy deletion declined: File:2013 NRL Grand Final logo.jpg
Hello Blurred Lines. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of File:2013 NRL Grand Final logo.jpg, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Nothing wrong with fair-use tag. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz /Stalk 15:21, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
- On the file, the user describes the photo being a logo, but on the license tag, it says "This is a representation of a government, military, regimental, family, or other symbol such as a flag, seal, emblem, coat of arms or crest." --Blurred Lines 15:30, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
- An invalid license type isn't covered by WP:F7. — Malik Shabazz /Stalk 15:58, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
- So, what do I do when I see a non free photo with the wrong copyright license? --Blurred Lines 16:01, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
- In some limited cases, WP:F3 allows the speedy deletion of files with invalid licenses. Otherwise, if you want to delete a file because of its license, try WP:Files for deletion. Or you could just fix it.
— Malik Shabazz /Stalk 16:07, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
- In some limited cases, WP:F3 allows the speedy deletion of files with invalid licenses. Otherwise, if you want to delete a file because of its license, try WP:Files for deletion. Or you could just fix it.
Untitled
Hi Blurred Lines
you deleted the following yesterday, or someone did, and I DO have permission to use it! A tag has been placed on File:Penelope Rowlands at a book party for Paris Was Ours, Idlewild Books, NYC, January 28,2013.jpg requesting that it be ...
Can you please help me upload it correctly. I've never tried to do such a thing before and I wanted to use it to illustrate an article. (Penelope Rowlands). I have permission from Algonquin Books's publicity department to upload it but I couldn't see where to put this information in the form
Thanks for any help you can offer!
Biographer1 (talk) 12:23, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
- I'm not the one in charge of deleting files, the admin RHaworth is, so if you would like to work something out with the administrator, please contact it. Also, if you had permission to use the file, you should of followed the directions on the deletion tag telling you what to do so it won't be deleted too quickly. --Blurred Lines 14:04, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for the note, I'll head on to the admin, now
- I've never tried to post a photo on Misplaced Pages before. Clearly, as you point out, I made a wrong move -- I'd to correct it. I have permission from the photo taker to use the photo.
- I cannot contact RHAworth -- just tried but it seems to be closed to comments. Can you please steer me somewhere where I can resolve this problem?
- I'd so appreciate it! Thank you!
- Biographer1 (talk) 15:11, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
- Well, there is nothing I can do. By me looking at you contributions, you saying that you "tried" doesn't make sense to me, because obviously you didn't contact the user at all. I'm not the admin here, RHaworth is, so you have to contact the administrator if you want the photo you uploaded restored. --Blurred Lines 15:19, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
File speedies
I see above a speedy nomination that you did being declined and I think "Untitled" relates to another. If you look at my talk page you will see three image deletion nominations of yours being declined: Lionel Fanthorpe 2013.jpg, New Zealand national rugby league team logo.svg and 2013ALCS.png. Note my comment re Lionel Fanthorpe - I do not want to see any of these massive Google URLs such as appear in this nomination. All I want to see is: "copyvio of as used in ". Please be more careful about speedy nominations in future. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:13, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
- Sir/Madam, if you don't want to see a Google website as proof of a copyright infringement, please don't bother judging it, because previously, other administrators just looks at the link, and deletes it, doesn't even go to my talk page and make a unnecessary complaint. As you may not know, I have been doing this for months now with Google and other sources, and never received a complaint about it. You being the only one is ridiculous, which means that your being unsupportive of what I do, and that's just sad. --Blurred Lines 14:02, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
Spam
Please do not add advertising or inappropriate external links to Misplaced Pages. Misplaced Pages is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Misplaced Pages. Thank you.. This message was sent by an automated bot. --HolfordBot (talk) 16:12, 9 October 2013 (UTC)