| Revision as of 00:35, 13 October 2013 editCreeper919 (talk | contribs)173 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:03, 28 October 2013 edit undoKrakatoaKatie (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators34,294 edits →page protection requests: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| == August 2013 == | == August 2013 == | ||
| ] Welcome to Misplaced Pages. At least one of ] did not appear to be constructive and has been ] or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Misplaced Pages, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the ] which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use ] for that. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-disruptive1 --> ''Your speedy deletion claim is blatantly false. '' <span style="border:1px solid #f57900;padding:1px;"><font style="color:#8f5902">]</font> ] </span> 00:41, 29 August 2013 (UTC) | ] Welcome to Misplaced Pages. At least one of ] did not appear to be constructive and has been ] or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Misplaced Pages, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the ] which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use ] for that. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-disruptive1 --> ''Your speedy deletion claim is blatantly false. '' <span style="border:1px solid #f57900;padding:1px;"><font style="color:#8f5902">]</font> ] </span> 00:41, 29 August 2013 (UTC) | ||
| == page protection requests == | |||
| We went through a very long list of your requests at ] today, and I'm sorry to tell you that none of them were necessary. | |||
| I also read some of your recent comments there. It's not necessary to make non-admin comments at RFPP, like some non-admins make at ] or ], as administrators almost always disregard them and make their own judgments about the individual situations. If you wish to engage an editor who has made a protection request, please do so at their user talk page or on the article talk page. | |||
| The ] is clear about which pages need protection. It borders on ] to place so many unnecessary requests that require administrator attention in the space of five hours. I hope that wasn't your intent, but I want to make sure you understand that such requests prevent us from responding to the pages that need to be protected quickly. | |||
| In any case, please make sure you understand the protection policy before you make another page protection request. Thanks. :-) ''']]''' 07:03, 28 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 07:03, 28 October 2013
June 2013
I think you should just look at the page so you will see how much vandalism that has built up. thank you. Creeper919 (talk) 00:35, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm 139.228.53.35. Your recent edit appears to have added premature information about a reported sports transaction, so I removed it for now. The transaction is based on anonymous sources and/or awaiting an official announcement. If you believe the transaction has been completed, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 139.228.53.35 (talk) 00:32, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Source on vote?
Agreed that Roll Call is not official, but I looked for the release you mentioned from the caucus and found nothing other than numerous references to it being between DeFazio and Grijalva. Never saw Holt's name in the mix (especially since he is running for Senate), so I reverted to the previous revision. Can you point me to the link? --Esprqii (talk) 20:54, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
Senate Appropriations Committee
I see your intention, and it makes sense, though the original text did not indicate that you were aiming to contrast the Senate Appropriations Committee with the House counterpart - and, truthfully, such a comparison seems a bit tangential. Erru il 1988 (talk) 22:10, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
August 2013
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. At least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Misplaced Pages, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Your speedy deletion claim is blatantly false. ViperSnake151 Talk 00:41, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
page protection requests
We went through a very long list of your requests at RFPP today, and I'm sorry to tell you that none of them were necessary.
I also read some of your recent comments there. It's not necessary to make non-admin comments at RFPP, like some non-admins make at AN or ANI, as administrators almost always disregard them and make their own judgments about the individual situations. If you wish to engage an editor who has made a protection request, please do so at their user talk page or on the article talk page.
The protection policy is clear about which pages need protection. It borders on disruptive editing to place so many unnecessary requests that require administrator attention in the space of five hours. I hope that wasn't your intent, but I want to make sure you understand that such requests prevent us from responding to the pages that need to be protected quickly.
In any case, please make sure you understand the protection policy before you make another page protection request. Thanks. :-) KrakatoaKatie 07:03, 28 October 2013 (UTC)