| Revision as of 19:22, 31 October 2013 editDrFleischman (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers25,325 edits →ACA← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:02, 1 November 2013 edit undoDrFleischman (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers25,325 edits →ACANext edit → | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
| In the future, please don't wait until you've hit the 3RR bright line before starting discussion. ''"The three-revert rule is a convenient limit for occasions when an edit war is happening fairly quickly, but it is not a definition of what "edit warring" means, and it is perfectly possible to edit war without breaking the three-revert rule, or even coming close to doing so."'' Thank you. --] (]) 19:04, 31 October 2013 (UTC) | In the future, please don't wait until you've hit the 3RR bright line before starting discussion. ''"The three-revert rule is a convenient limit for occasions when an edit war is happening fairly quickly, but it is not a definition of what "edit warring" means, and it is perfectly possible to edit war without breaking the three-revert rule, or even coming close to doing so."'' Thank you. --] (]) 19:04, 31 October 2013 (UTC) | ||
| {{{icon|]}}} '''This is your last warning.''' If you continue to engage in edit warring this issue while it is currently being discussed on ], as you did , then I will create a report at ], which may lead to administrative sanctions. --] (]) 21:02, 1 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:02, 1 November 2013
Disambiguation link notification for August 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Epicurus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Loyola University (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:37, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
Revert
I assume this revert was a mistake? If not, it was highly inappropriate of you to accuse User:Bobrayner of being the IP. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:06, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for the Semi. I was following the IP and did not see Bob's edit, so no linking the two was intended. I did intend to restore the current, briefer version of Chomsky's comment. Attleboro (talk) 19:12, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
- Ok, glad to hear that. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:56, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
ACA
You have been reverted by 3 seperate editors on your opinion. I suggest you take it to talk. Arzel (talk) 17:47, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
- Will do... Attleboro (talk) 17:52, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
In the future, please don't wait until you've hit the 3RR bright line before starting discussion. "The three-revert rule is a convenient limit for occasions when an edit war is happening fairly quickly, but it is not a definition of what "edit warring" means, and it is perfectly possible to edit war without breaking the three-revert rule, or even coming close to doing so." Thank you. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 19:04, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
This is your last warning. If you continue to engage in edit warring this issue while it is currently being discussed on the talk page, as you did here, then I will create a report at WP:ANEW, which may lead to administrative sanctions. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 21:02, 1 November 2013 (UTC)