Revision as of 07:47, 31 October 2013 editRacklever (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers155,090 editsm Clean-up, replaced: living=yes → living=no using AWB← Previous edit |
Revision as of 15:00, 4 November 2013 edit undoLegobot (talk | contribs)Bots1,667,524 edits Removing expired RFC template.Next edit → |
Line 7: |
Line 7: |
|
|
|
|
|
==RfC: Should publicly-available, but obscure, information be included if it compromises the subject's family's privacy?== |
|
==RfC: Should publicly-available, but obscure, information be included if it compromises the subject's family's privacy?== |
|
{{rfc|bio|rfcid=8A7A6A8}} |
|
|
When this page was created, one sentence in it read "Bairamian met Sylvia Vertanessian, the daughter of survivors of the 1922 ], Haroutioun and Arsenouhie Vertanessian." It was later changed to "Bairamian met his future wife, Sylvia, the daughter of survivors of the 1922 ]." The reason given for this change was that making Sylvia's maiden name so easy to find could compromise the family's privacy and security. However, the information exists in a public, though obscure (and not in English), source. Should this be included or excluded? ] (]) 14:40, 5 October 2013 (UTC) |
|
When this page was created, one sentence in it read "Bairamian met Sylvia Vertanessian, the daughter of survivors of the 1922 ], Haroutioun and Arsenouhie Vertanessian." It was later changed to "Bairamian met his future wife, Sylvia, the daughter of survivors of the 1922 ]." The reason given for this change was that making Sylvia's maiden name so easy to find could compromise the family's privacy and security. However, the information exists in a public, though obscure (and not in English), source. Should this be included or excluded? ] (]) 14:40, 5 October 2013 (UTC) |
|
::I am not sure that I understand the privacy and security issue here. If Sylvia is still alive she will likely be 100 years old or so, and not have been using the maiden name for 70 years. Anyone wanting to find the family would be more likely to look them up in the Hollywood, California phone book than to research their genealogy. How would knowing the wife's maiden was help anyone find them and disturb them today? Are members of the Vertanessian family being persecuted in some way and need to remain obscure? —] (]) 12:16, 19 October 2013 (UTC) |
|
::I am not sure that I understand the privacy and security issue here. If Sylvia is still alive she will likely be 100 years old or so, and not have been using the maiden name for 70 years. Anyone wanting to find the family would be more likely to look them up in the Hollywood, California phone book than to research their genealogy. How would knowing the wife's maiden was help anyone find them and disturb them today? Are members of the Vertanessian family being persecuted in some way and need to remain obscure? —] (]) 12:16, 19 October 2013 (UTC) |
When this page was created, one sentence in it read "Bairamian met Sylvia Vertanessian, the daughter of survivors of the 1922 Burning of Smyrna, Haroutioun and Arsenouhie Vertanessian." It was later changed to "Bairamian met his future wife, Sylvia, the daughter of survivors of the 1922 Burning of Smyrna." The reason given for this change was that making Sylvia's maiden name so easy to find could compromise the family's privacy and security. However, the information exists in a public, though obscure (and not in English), source. Should this be included or excluded? Jackmcbarn (talk) 14:40, 5 October 2013 (UTC)