Misplaced Pages

User talk:Richard Hawkins: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:40, 8 June 2006 editRichard Hawkins (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,395 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 22:23, 11 June 2006 edit undoMikeHobday (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers3,091 edits Query, US coursingNext edit →
Line 11: Line 11:


Thank you Alexander!] 16:40, 8 June 2006 (UTC) Thank you Alexander!] 16:40, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

==Hare coursing==
I'm pleased to see some of the changes you are making to this page. Do you know much about coursing in America? I see from , for example, one claim that coursing is intended to kill the hare there. I feel that the article is too anglo-centric at the momenbt, and would benefit from a wider expertise. Regards ] 22:23, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:23, 11 June 2006

Welcome!

Hello, Richard Hawkins, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 16:18, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

Thank you Alexander!Richard Hawkins 16:40, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

Hare coursing

I'm pleased to see some of the changes you are making to this page. Do you know much about coursing in America? I see from , for example, one claim that coursing is intended to kill the hare there. I feel that the article is too anglo-centric at the momenbt, and would benefit from a wider expertise. Regards MikeHobday 22:23, 11 June 2006 (UTC)