Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 06:50, 12 November 2013

This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated.

If you are discussing an article: I would prefer to use that article's talk page, unless you'd rather not to use that page for some reason, such as commenting on a particular user's edits in semi-privacy. If I leave a message for you: Please respond on your talk page. I'll probably add it to my watchlist, but if I miss something, feel free to leave a talkback. If you leave a message for me: I will most likely respond here. Either add this page to your watchlist or ask me to notify you of a response on your talk page. If I remove your message from my talk page: Please DO NOT re-add the same meassage, or follow-up with another message - They will be removed again. This is a sign that I am disengaging from contact with you and/or the subject matter. The only exception is for messages where WP requires that a user be informed of an ANI or similar discussion. Please limit this talk page to discussions not related to any particular article, those covering a wide range of articles/topics, or personal comments. If you wish to keep a matter confidential, such as discussing personal and/or confidential information, you may use the "E-mail" feature (usually activated!). I will respond in kind unless otherwise requested. This is not for discussing routine matters regarding editing on pages - use the article talk pages for that. If you want me to take your opinions and edits seriously, you ought to register.. Otherwise one never knows who really made the edits, especially in the case of dynamic IP addresses. Also, having a unique body of work in your edit history is helpful to other editors in many positive ways. Note: I reserve the right to decline or withdraw from a situation that is escalating or uncomfortable, without giving a reason, or to take further action through permissable means. This may include removing your messages from my talk page. If I mistakenly called your edits as vandalism when I reverted them, it was probably because you did not leave an edit summary. Please realize that, in many cases, unexplained edits are indistinguishable from vandalism! This also applies to Rollbacks. If you're here to troll, harass, or vandalise, I might not be able to stop you, but you will be reverted...and beware the giant dice.

Archives

Archive 1 - October 2006 - March 2007 Archive 2 - April - May 2007 Archive 3 - May - June 2007 Archive 4 - June - July 2007 Archive 5 - August - September 2007 Archive 6 - October - November 2007 Archive 7 - December 2007 - February 2008 Archive 8 - March 2008 - May 2008 Archive 9 - June 2008 - August 2008 Archive 10 - September 2008 - November 2008 Archive 11 - December 2008 - March 2009 Archive 12 - April 2009 - June 2009 Archive 13 - July 2009 - Dec 2009 Archive 14 - Jan 2010 - June 2010 Archive 15 - June 2010 - August 2013 Archive 16 - December 2010 - August 2013 Archive 17 - August 2013 -

This page has archives. Sections older than 21 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 4 sections are present.

Black Cat (B-24)

Hi Bill, I moved the article to fit in with the vast majority of named aircraft articles (that I have come across), which use the name in italics, followed by the aircraft type in parentheses. I know there is no laid down strict policy, but if there is a majority of similar articles named this way, does that not count as concensus?--Petebutt (talk) 11:22, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

The vast majority of named aircraft articles don't use a disambiguator at all, as it's not needed. In Category:Individual aircraft, 16 articles with disambiguators use aircraft, airship, or helicopter, etc, while 4 use the type. In Category:Individual aircraft of World War II, 9 articles with disambiguators use aircraft, airship, or helicopter, etc, while 14 use the type. (I've not included Black Cat in the totals here.) That's 25 using aircraft, etc, and 18 using the type. Not a vast majority either way, but using type is in the minority. It does appear we need to address the issue to get a clear consensus one way or another. I'll start a discussion (or you can start it if you beat me to it!) at WT:AIR/NC, with notices about the discussion at WT:AIR and WT:AVIATION. - BilCat (talk) 14:43, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Co-nom for FAC

Hi BilCat, since you have contributed extensively to AV-8B, are you willing to be co-nom for its upcoming FAC? --Sp33dyphil ©_ontributions 08:56, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the offer, but FACs are beyond my area of expertise on WP. Good luck in your effort to improve the article to FAC status. - BilCat (talk) 12:35, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Georgia

I have raised this at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Disambiguation#Georgia. 183.89.118.75 (talk) 20:33, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Are you working on the College Football Wiki Project? How can I help? Myself and other classmates are studying wiki projects at the University of Washington, but we are all first time users. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.135.6.65 (talk) 01:11, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Apologies for my absence

Hey Bill, how's it going? Sorry for being MIA for over 2 months, been very busy with the family matters as well as MI's 737 MAX program. Anything I missed? :) --Dave 06:15, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Hey Dave, welcome back! Always interesting stuff going on. You can check my archives, see if you find anything you like. ;) - BilCat (talk) 06:21, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Remember the "lost due to navigational error" fracas on the SR-71 page a few years ago? Check out Space Shuttle's history for the new version, by a presumably unrelated, though about as smart, user! - BilCat (talk) 06:28, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

• Again?!?! Wow... more than 60 days I was away and here I am, back to the same shit. Well, it is quite clear that someone's (or a lot of someone) been watching too much of afternoon reruns. Thunderbirds are go~! :) --Dave 18:04, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

• On a sidenote, wonder why and how these clowns got so much free time to harrass people like us? --Dave 09:08, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Asylum residents have lots of free time. And after-school-care delinquents. ;) - BilCat (talk) 09:11, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

• Oh yeah, and those wannabe-hackers too. Nothing more than hormonal imbalance freaks at their most hilarious, eh? But, nothing surprises me these days. --Dave 16:01, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Meow. It's amazing how long this person can nurse a grudge. I am sorry for the original angry outburst six/seven years ago that triggered all this, and I hope Vasily/Vladimir can find the strength to forgive and move on. If not, they will reap what they sow. And that's a promise from Someone far greater than me. - BilCat (talk) 21:09, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

• Better tell them to go read up on Proverbs 26:11 because from what we're seeing here, that pooch really likes to return to his vomit. But, I guess that's how predictable and no fun he has become over the years, eh? --Dave 16:32, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

That OWB is a reminder of the Master's admonishment to love those who hate us, and to− pray for those who despitefully abuse us. It's sobering advice, and not easy to do. - BilCat (talk) 18:32, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

• Repeat after me: "I forgive them~!" --Dave 20:44, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

I already have, and extended the offer to reciprocate. You saw the response. You know I had my issues with User:MickMacNee, but I'll give him this: He has not, to my knowledge, broken his ban. He well could have chosen the cowardly route and harassed his detractors by hiding behind socks and IPs, but he moved on, and that is to his credit. - BilCat (talk) 20:58, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

OV-10

Remember this? Wel, I found this on youtube and thought you might be interested. Also, I got a URL (http://www.airvectors.net/avbronco.html) for you to check out if you're still keen. Cheers~! --Dave 17:27, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

I just saw that post the other day. We can't use much from Airvectors, as it's self-published, but it can help me know where to start. Thanks. - BilCat (talk) 17:35, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

I didn't see any mention of carrier capability in the Airvectors piece, but he does have a photo of a Bronco on an LHA. We have one too, I think. ;) - BilCat (talk) 17:44, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Actually, it's the same exact photo! :) - BilCat (talk) 17:50, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

• Yup! I saw that, not surprising since it is DOD-PD material. :) --Dave 17:55, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Flight Deck

Matter referred to Dispute Resolution notice board Solicitr (talk) 21:00, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Misplaced Pages:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is "Flight Deck". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! EarwigBot  21:01, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

November 2013

Please do not attack other editors, as you did on User talk:Nick Thorne. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. regarding this edit - thewolfchild 06:50, 12 November 2013 (UTC)