| Revision as of 18:44, 19 November 2013 editAntidiskriminator (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers58,480 edits →Source interpretation: precise← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:33, 19 November 2013 edit undoDrmies (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators406,277 edits notification of arbcom dsNext edit → | ||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
| I noticed your edit () in article about ]. With this edit you removed properly referenced assertion related to Serbs of Kosovo and their discrimination and in the same time you added irrelevant assertion about "Serb government took yet another step towards full recognition of the Republic of Kosovo". You supported this assertion with this source () which does not even mention "full recognition of the Republic of Kosovo". Please be so kind not to repeat this kind of disruptive editing in future. Thanks.--] (]) 18:43, 19 November 2013 (UTC) | I noticed your edit () in article about ]. With this edit you removed properly referenced assertion related to Serbs of Kosovo and their discrimination and in the same time you added irrelevant assertion about "Serb government took yet another step towards full recognition of the Republic of Kosovo". You supported this assertion with this source () which does not even mention "full recognition of the Republic of Kosovo". Please be so kind not to repeat this kind of disruptive editing in future. Thanks.--] (]) 18:43, 19 November 2013 (UTC) | ||
| {{Ivmbox | |||
| | The ] has permitted ] to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at ]) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to the ]. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the ], satisfy any ], or follow any ]. If you inappropriately edit pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "]" section of the decision page. | |||
| Please familiarise yourself with the information page at ], with the appropriate sections of ], and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice is given by an uninvolved administrator and will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system. | |||
| | Ambox warning pn.svg | |||
| | icon size = 40px | |||
| }}<!-- This message is derived from Template:Uw-sanctions --> | |||
Revision as of 20:33, 19 November 2013
Automatic invitation to visit WP:Teahouse sent by HostBot
|
Hi Cognoscerapo! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages. |
Request for Comment
Please see here Regards IJA (talk) 00:29, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Misplaced Pages:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is "Republic of Kosovo". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! --Guy Macon (talk) 02:24, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
Dispute resolution noticeboard
Hi! Are you planning on participating at Misplaced Pages:Dispute resolution noticeboard#Republic of Kosovo, or would you prefer to be removed from the case? You are not required to participate, but your participation would be welcome. --Guy Macon (talk) 18:06, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
Source interpretation and deletion of cited addition
Hello,
I noticed your edit (diff) in article about Serbs of Kosovo. With this edit you removed properly referenced assertion related to Serbs of Kosovo and their discrimination and in the same time you added irrelevant assertion about "Serb government took yet another step towards full recognition of the Republic of Kosovo". You supported this assertion with this source (link) which does not even mention "full recognition of the Republic of Kosovo". Please be so kind not to repeat this kind of disruptive editing in future. Thanks.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 18:43, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to the Balkans. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, satisfy any standard of behavior, or follow any normal editorial process. If you inappropriately edit pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "Final decision" section of the decision page.
Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice is given by an uninvolved administrator and will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.