| Revision as of 18:34, 24 November 2013 editSrich32977 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers299,732 editsm Copyedit (minor)← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:37, 24 November 2013 edit undoSrich32977 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers299,732 edits →Social and historical views: remove unbalanced criticisms of DiL made by Jaffe-affiliated Claremont scholarsNext edit → | ||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
| The publication of '']'' garnered increased attention for DiLorenzo's views concerning President Lincoln and the U.S. Civil War. In a review published by the Ludwig von Mises Institute, where both he and DiLorenzo are Senior Fellows and colleagues on the Mises Institute faculty,<ref>{{cite web|title=Mises Institute Faculty|url=http://academy.mises.org/faculty/|publisher=Mises Institute|accessdate=24 November 2013}}</ref> historian ] noted DiLorenzo's arguments that the tariffs Lincoln put in place were the cause of the Civil War and that Lincoln was a "thoroughgoing dictator" who suppressed civil liberties.<ref>DiLorenzo, Thomas J. (2002). ''The Mises Review''. '''8'''(2).</ref> Regarding slavery, Gordon quotes DiLorenzo as writing: " was already in sharp decline in the border states and the upper South generally, mostly for economic reasons". | The publication of '']'' garnered increased attention for DiLorenzo's views concerning President Lincoln and the U.S. Civil War. In a review published by the Ludwig von Mises Institute, where both he and DiLorenzo are Senior Fellows and colleagues on the Mises Institute faculty,<ref>{{cite web|title=Mises Institute Faculty|url=http://academy.mises.org/faculty/|publisher=Mises Institute|accessdate=24 November 2013}}</ref> historian ] noted DiLorenzo's arguments that the tariffs Lincoln put in place were the cause of the Civil War and that Lincoln was a "thoroughgoing dictator" who suppressed civil liberties.<ref>DiLorenzo, Thomas J. (2002). ''The Mises Review''. '''8'''(2).</ref> Regarding slavery, Gordon quotes DiLorenzo as writing: " was already in sharp decline in the border states and the upper South generally, mostly for economic reasons". | ||
| In 2002, DiLorenzo debated ] on the merits of ]'s statesmanship before and during the civil war. |
In 2002, DiLorenzo debated ] on the merits of ]'s statesmanship before and during the civil war. | ||
| DiLorenzo is a frequent speaker at ] events, and offers several online courses on political subjects on the Mises Academy platform.<ref name = "mises" />He also writes for ].<ref> for ].</ref> | DiLorenzo is a frequent speaker at ] events, and offers several online courses on political subjects on the Mises Academy platform.<ref name = "mises" />He also writes for ].<ref> for ].</ref> | ||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
| DiLorenoz has written in defense of the right to secession. In a 2004 article on ] DiLorenzo wrote that many libertarians refused to support secession of the union by ] because there government was not a "libertarian nirvana". He pointed out that ], ] and ] had defended secession by the states. He wrote: " If the war was over the central government's "right" to destroy the right of secession, which both Abraham Lincoln and the U.S. Congress insisted, then the South was in the right, according to both Rothbard and Acton. One need not defend or glorify the Confederacy in order to arrive at such a conclusion." | DiLorenoz has written in defense of the right to secession. In a 2004 article on ] DiLorenzo wrote that many libertarians refused to support secession of the union by ] because there government was not a "libertarian nirvana". He pointed out that ], ] and ] had defended secession by the states. He wrote: " If the war was over the central government's "right" to destroy the right of secession, which both Abraham Lincoln and the U.S. Congress insisted, then the South was in the right, according to both Rothbard and Acton. One need not defend or glorify the Confederacy in order to arrive at such a conclusion." | ||
| In 2005 he wrote another article on LewRockwell.com regarding attacks on ], author of the best-selling '']'', because of his earlier association with the southern nationalist group the ]. DiLorenzo wrote that the "imperialistic neoconservative cult" that dominated the ] was engaging in "character assassination" in order to defend their agenda. He said regarding the League of the South "Rather than pledging undying loyalty to the state and its imperialistic adventures — the defining characteristic of a neocon — the League asserts that 'Our strongest and most enduring earthly affections and allegiances" are to "families, friends, neighbors, villages, towns, cities, counties, and States,' and not 'the nation' or worse, the 'global community.'" He also wrote that the League "advocates peace and prosperity in the tradition of a George Washington or a Thomas Jefferson".<ref>Dilorenzo, Thomas J. (February 25, 2005). "". LewRockwell.com</ref> |
In 2005 he wrote another article on LewRockwell.com regarding attacks on ], author of the best-selling '']'', because of his earlier association with the southern nationalist group the ]. DiLorenzo wrote that the "imperialistic neoconservative cult" that dominated the ] was engaging in "character assassination" in order to defend their agenda. He said regarding the League of the South "Rather than pledging undying loyalty to the state and its imperialistic adventures — the defining characteristic of a neocon — the League asserts that 'Our strongest and most enduring earthly affections and allegiances" are to "families, friends, neighbors, villages, towns, cities, counties, and States,' and not 'the nation' or worse, the 'global community.'" He also wrote that the League "advocates peace and prosperity in the tradition of a George Washington or a Thomas Jefferson".<ref>Dilorenzo, Thomas J. (February 25, 2005). "". LewRockwell.com</ref> | ||
| == League of the South controversy == | == League of the South controversy == | ||
Revision as of 18:37, 24 November 2013
 | The neutrality of this article is disputed. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please do not remove this message until conditions to do so are met. (November 2013) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
| Thomas DiLorenzo | |
|---|---|
 Thomas DiLorenzo at CPAC in February 2010. | |
| Born | (1954-08-08) August 8, 1954 (age 70) |
| Nationality | United States |
| Academic career | |
| Field | Economic history, American history |
| School or tradition | Austrian School |
| Influences | Henry Hazlitt, John T. Flynn |
Thomas James DiLorenzo (born August 8, 1954) is an American economics professor at Loyola University Maryland Sellinger School of Business. He identifies himself as an adherent of the Austrian School of economics. He is a research fellow at The Independent Institute, a senior fellow of the Ludwig von Mises Institute, and an associate of the Abbeville Institute. He holds a Ph.D. in Economics from Virginia Tech.
Social and historical views
See also: Lincoln Unmasked and The Real LincolnDiLorenzo writes about what he calls "the myth of Lincoln" in American history and politics. He has said, "Lincoln is on record time after time rejecting the idea of racial equality. But whenever anyone brings this up, the Lincoln partisans go to the extreme to smear the bearer of bad news." DiLorenzo has also spoken out in favor of the secession of the Confederate States of America, defending the right of these states to secede.
The publication of The Real Lincoln garnered increased attention for DiLorenzo's views concerning President Lincoln and the U.S. Civil War. In a review published by the Ludwig von Mises Institute, where both he and DiLorenzo are Senior Fellows and colleagues on the Mises Institute faculty, historian David Gordon noted DiLorenzo's arguments that the tariffs Lincoln put in place were the cause of the Civil War and that Lincoln was a "thoroughgoing dictator" who suppressed civil liberties. Regarding slavery, Gordon quotes DiLorenzo as writing: " was already in sharp decline in the border states and the upper South generally, mostly for economic reasons".
In 2002, DiLorenzo debated Harry V. Jaffa on the merits of Abraham Lincoln's statesmanship before and during the civil war.
DiLorenzo is a frequent speaker at von Mises Institute events, and offers several online courses on political subjects on the Mises Academy platform.He also writes for LewRockwell.com.
DiLorenoz has written in defense of the right to secession. In a 2004 article on LewRockwell.com DiLorenzo wrote that many libertarians refused to support secession of the union by Confederate states because there government was not a "libertarian nirvana". He pointed out that Murray Rothbard, Lord Acton and Lysander Spooner had defended secession by the states. He wrote: " If the war was over the central government's "right" to destroy the right of secession, which both Abraham Lincoln and the U.S. Congress insisted, then the South was in the right, according to both Rothbard and Acton. One need not defend or glorify the Confederacy in order to arrive at such a conclusion."
In 2005 he wrote another article on LewRockwell.com regarding attacks on Thomas Woods, author of the best-selling The Politically Incorrect Guide to American History , because of his earlier association with the southern nationalist group the League of the South. DiLorenzo wrote that the "imperialistic neoconservative cult" that dominated the Republican Party was engaging in "character assassination" in order to defend their agenda. He said regarding the League of the South "Rather than pledging undying loyalty to the state and its imperialistic adventures — the defining characteristic of a neocon — the League asserts that 'Our strongest and most enduring earthly affections and allegiances" are to "families, friends, neighbors, villages, towns, cities, counties, and States,' and not 'the nation' or worse, the 'global community.'" He also wrote that the League "advocates peace and prosperity in the tradition of a George Washington or a Thomas Jefferson".
League of the South controversy
| This section may lend undue weight to certain ideas, incidents, or controversies. Please help to create a more balanced presentation. Discuss and resolve this issue before removing this message. (November 2013) |
Controversy over DiLorenzo's associations with the League of the South arose when DiLorenzo testified before the House Financial Services Committee at the behest of former U.S. Congressman Ron Paul. Congressman Lacy Clay criticized DiLorenzo for participation in the League, which he described as a "neo-Confederate group" which advocates "a society dominated by European Americans"; after Clay's remarks at the testimony, DiLorenzo's connection with the League was mentioned by several major mainstream news organizations, including the Washington Post, Reuters, and the Baltimore Sun. In an article written for a LewRockwell.com piece written in response, DiLorenzo attacked Clay as a "liar and bigot" and described his association with the League as limited to "a few lectures on the economics of the Civil War" he gave to The League of the South Institute about thirteen years ago. DiLorenzo's alleged association with the League was investigated by his employer, Loyola University Maryland, whose vice president for academic affairs told the Baltimore Sun that "Professor DiLorenzo has denied any affiliation" with the League, and that "if we find there's more to this, certainly we would take appropriate action."
Following the controversy, Washington Post columnist Dana Milbank wrote that the League of the South was listing DiLorenzo as an 'affiliated scholar' as recently as 2008 on its Web site.
Publications
DiLorenzo has authored several books, including:
- Organized Crime: The Unvarnished Truth About Government (2012). ISBN 9781610162562. OCLC 815625479
- Hamilton's Curse: How Jefferson's Arch Enemy Betrayed the American Revolution – and What It Means for Americans Today (2008). ISBN 9780307382849. OCLC 593712801
- Lincoln Unmasked: What You're Not Supposed To Know about Dishonest Abe (2006). ISBN 9780307338419. OCLC 67727894
- How Capitalism Saved America: The Untold History of Our Country, From the Pilgrims to the Present (2004). ISBN 9780761525264. OCLC 834478638, 56895316
- The Real Lincoln: A New Look at Abraham Lincoln, His Agenda, and an Unnecessary War (2003). ISBN 9780761536413. OCLC 716369332
- From Pathology to Politics: Public Health in America (2000)
- The Food and Drink Police: America's Nannies, Busybodies, and Petty Tyrants (1998). ISBN 9781560003854 OCLC 60213705
- CancerScam: The Diversion of Federal Cancer Funds for Politics (1997)
References
- Thomas DiLorenzo, The New Deal Debunked (again), Mises Daily, September 27, 2004.
- http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/108102.html
- ^ Sellinger School of Business and Management, Loyola University Maryland Faculty Directory and Sellinger School of Business school staff profile of Thomas DiLorenzo, accessed November 22, 2013.
- Interview with Thomas DiLorenzo at Ludwig von Mises Institute website, August 16, 2010.
- Thomas DeLorenzo profile at The Independent Institute website, accessed November 22, 2013.
- ^ Thomas DiLorenzo profile, at the Ludwig von Mises Institute website, accessed November 22, 2013.
- Abbeville Institute associates list, accessed November 22, 2013.
- "Confronting the Lincoln Cult," Mises Daily 3 June 2002
- "An Abolitionist Defends the South," LewRockwell.com October 20, 2004]
- "Mises Institute Faculty". Mises Institute. Retrieved 24 November 2013.
- DiLorenzo, Thomas J. (2002). "The Real Lincoln: A New Look at Abraham Lincoln, His Agenda, and an Unnecessary War." The Mises Review. 8(2).
- Archive of DiLorenzo commentary for LewRockwell.com.
- Dilorenzo, Thomas J. (February 25, 2005). "The Dreaded 'S' Word". LewRockwell.com
- Walker, Childs (February 11, 2011). "Loyola professor faces questions about ties to pro-secession group". The Baltimore Sun.
- Milbank, Dana (February 9, 2011). "Ron Paul's economic Rx: a Southern secessionist". The Washington Post.
- Sullivan, Andy (February 9, 2011). "Paul calls Fed's Bernanke "cocky" in House hearing." Reuters
- Walker, Childs (February 11, 2011). "Loyola professor faces questions about ties to pro-secession group." The Baltimore Sun
- "My Associations with Liars, Bigots, and Murderers", Lewrockwell.com, February 11, 2011
- Burris, Joe (February 14, 2011). "Loyola investigating whether professor has ties to hate group." The Baltimore Sun
- Milbank, Dana (February 9, 2011). "Ron Paul's economic Rx: a Southern secessionist". The Washington Post. Retrieved 24 November 2013.
- League of the South Institute for the Study of Southern History and Culture
- Loyola University Maryland, listing of representative publications for Dr. Thomas J. Di Lorenzo
External links
- Mises Archive of DiLorenzo commentary Lectures by DiLorenzo at the Ludwig von Mises Institute.
- Archive of DiLorenzo commentary for The Independent Institute
- Archive of DiLorenzo commentary for LewRockwell.com
- The Real Abraham Lincoln – a debate between Thomas DiLorenzo and Harry V. Jaffa
- Critical review of The Real Lincoln by Thomas Krannawitter of the Claremont Institute
- DiLorenzo and his Critics by Clyde N. Wilson
- Interview with Thomas DiLorenzo in the " Southern Partisan."
- C-SPAN Q&A interview with DiLorenzo, about his two books on Abraham Lincoln, May 25, 2008
- The 2006 Steven Berger Seminar: Thomas DiLorenzo (10 videos)