Misplaced Pages

User talk:Carolmooredc: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:22, 24 November 2013 editCarolmooredc (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers31,944 edits Recent unsigned comment on Hoppe: Please learn to use <nowiki>{{unsigned|date=November 2013}}</nowiki>← Previous edit Revision as of 21:24, 24 November 2013 edit undoCarolmooredc (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers31,944 edits Recent unsigned comment on Hoppe: furtherNext edit →
Line 38: Line 38:


Please sign it. ]] 21:19, 24 November 2013 (UTC) Please sign it. ]] 21:19, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
:This is not what I consider an official notice. Please learn to use <nowiki>{{unsigned|date=November 2013}}</nowiki> Thanks. <small>'''] (])</small>''' 21:22, 24 November 2013 (UTC) :This is not what I consider an official notice but a minor example of the nitpicking harassment for which you have been banned from the page. Please learn to use <nowiki>{{unsigned|date=November 2013}}</nowiki> Thanks. <small>'''] (])</small>''' 21:22, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:24, 24 November 2013

File:Large Sunspot Group AR 9393.gif
Thanks for visiting my Talk page. Enjoy the sunspots and don't let them get you too hyper!
Please post comments about the content of a specific article on the Talk Page of that Article if it is relevant to all editors.'

This user wants to see everything in its place.

Green Line for Barnstars, Archives, Other Stuff

Edit-Warring on DiLorenzo

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
You are at 4RR on Thomas DiLorenzo. Please undo your last edit and do not edit war. Use talk and do not disparage other editors. Thanks.

SPECIFICO talk 23:41, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

And where is Steeletrap, with her BLP edits? (She made 9 changes, so let's see you put a warning on her talk page.) You, Specifico, did 11 edits. You might tag your own talk page, especially after putting Lacy Clay's image in the article. Talk about WP:POINTy behavior. – S. Rich (talk) 23:58, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Two additions of material (including correction of bad links and tags) and three reverts in 24 hours for clearly stated WP:BLP reasons (revert of WP:POV photo; 2 changes/reverts to questionable allegations from advocacy sources which I asked to be given time to verify, and absurd claim advocacy criticism is "scholarship"), hardly makes edit warring. Please study WP:Revert and do not leave specious warning notices. 15:50, 23 November 2013 (UTC)Carolmooredc (Talkie-Talkie)
Comment for the record, not to invite comment from SPECIFICO et al who are banned from my talk page:
  • 16:03, November 22, 2013? Carolmooredc (talk | contribs)? . . (11,412 bytes) (+34)? . . (neither article nor DiLorenzo calls it neoconfederate and just another POV attack from POV warrior; same as moving to scholarship) (Note: Steeletrap’s reversion was against BRD; BLP implications again discussed at talk page)
  • 15:28, November 22, 2013? Carolmooredc (talk | contribs)? . . (10,340 bytes) (+801)? . . (add ref'd material and, update, cleanup refs)
  • 14:44, November 22, 2013? Carolmooredc (talk | contribs)? . . (10,182 bytes) (-282)? . . (SPLC not a academic critic of books; move LoSouth stuff down to "controversy" section; remove duplicative and POV/verbose descriptions; need to verify all this since I'm sure DiLorenzo has said more in self defense against a profitable advocacy group) (Note: BLP implications again discussed at talk page)
  • 14:00, November 22, 2013? Carolmooredc (talk | contribs)? . . (10,651 bytes) (+27)? . . ({{POV|date=November 2013}} Undue and Spooner talk sections already discuss some reasons; so needs tags til more NPOV info added and WP:Undue removed)
  • 12:56, November 22, 2013? Carolmooredc (talk | contribs)? . . (10,609 bytes) (-86)? . . (Undid revision 582835058 by SPECIFICO (talk)absurd and POV use of a photo in a BLP; talk about WP:Undue)

Recent unsigned comment on Hoppe

Please sign it. SPECIFICO talk 21:19, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

This is not what I consider an official notice but a minor example of the nitpicking harassment for which you have been banned from the page. Please learn to use {{unsigned|date=November 2013}} Thanks. Carolmooredc (Talkie-Talkie) 21:22, 24 November 2013 (UTC)