| Revision as of 19:42, 5 December 2013 editSpeedyAstro (talk | contribs)322 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:46, 6 December 2013 edit undoGogo Dodo (talk | contribs)Administrators197,922 edits →Re: Thank you!: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
| Christian <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 03:52, 5 December 2013 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | Christian <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 03:52, 5 December 2013 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | ||
| :The article itself does nothing except promote dotBEST; it isn't neutral or encyclopedic at all. ] (]) 03:57, 5 December 2013 (UTC) | :The article itself does nothing except promote dotBEST; it isn't neutral or encyclopedic at all. ] (]) 03:57, 5 December 2013 (UTC) | ||
| == Re: Thank you! == | |||
| Re : Not a problem. I saw the article in Recent Changes shortly after you tagged it. It was obvious something funny was going on with it and highly unlikely to be able to meet its lofty proclamation. -- ] (]) 04:46, 6 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 04:46, 6 December 2013
Hi,
Do you know anything about writing biographies?
- No,sorry, Trickstam. I do know writing an autobiography about oneself is strongly discouraged, and that one should follow the guidelines, of course, but I don't write biographies on Misplaced Pages, or at all. I wouldn't know where to start. SpeedyAstro (talk) 19:42, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
dotBEST
Hi there,
Thanks for helping to curate the dotBEST article. Can you please give me some more specific feedback on how the article is promotional?
Thanks!
Christian — Preceding unsigned comment added by PeopleBrowsrSydney (talk • contribs) 03:52, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
- The article itself does nothing except promote dotBEST; it isn't neutral or encyclopedic at all. Read up on this on this clicky-link. SpeedyAstro (talk) 03:57, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
Re: Thank you!
Re your message: Not a problem. I saw the article in Recent Changes shortly after you tagged it. It was obvious something funny was going on with it and highly unlikely to be able to meet its lofty proclamation. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:46, 6 December 2013 (UTC)