| Revision as of 19:29, 8 December 2013 editAndy Dingley (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers160,213 edits →December 2013← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:34, 8 December 2013 edit undoWerieth (talk | contribs)54,678 edits →December 2013Next edit → | ||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
| :: Edit-warring is edit-warring. It is disruptive to the smooth running of WP, including the NFCR board. Your edit-warring (which is self-evident, I'm not going to mince words) does nothing to further your assumed aim of ensuring that WP appropriately complies with its relevant policies, it merely sends everyone around in circles. | :: Edit-warring is edit-warring. It is disruptive to the smooth running of WP, including the NFCR board. Your edit-warring (which is self-evident, I'm not going to mince words) does nothing to further your assumed aim of ensuring that WP appropriately complies with its relevant policies, it merely sends everyone around in circles. | ||
| :: NFCC is complex and subjective. These images include at least one major artwork by a notable artist, of a substantially notable individual subject. It's relevance per NFC is ''not'' cut and dried, it is precisely the sort of issue that does ''not'' "unquestionably violate" NFCC and 3RRNO#5. In addition, you have been frequently warned and even blocked over ''precisely'' that issue. ] (]) 19:29, 8 December 2013 (UTC) | :: NFCC is complex and subjective. These images include at least one major artwork by a notable artist, of a substantially notable individual subject. It's relevance per NFC is ''not'' cut and dried, it is precisely the sort of issue that does ''not'' "unquestionably violate" NFCC and 3RRNO#5. In addition, you have been frequently warned and even blocked over ''precisely'' that issue. ] (]) 19:29, 8 December 2013 (UTC) | ||
| :::Actually ] is a cut and try case of unquestionable violation. I know the complexity of NFCC far far more than you do. Given your driveby ] actions and failure to understand NFCC, your stalking and harassment I will file a ban request for you if you continue your inappropriate actions. I have not requested any bans yet for you, just brought up the possibility several times given ] in regards to NFCC which you seem to be lacking. ] (]) 19:34, 8 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:34, 8 December 2013
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. Thank you.
Transclusions of Special:ListFiles and Special:NewFiles
I found out that you can transclude special pages such as {{Special:ListFiles}} and {{Special:NewFiles}}. See for example Special:PermanentLink/562555956. This is a clear violation of WP:NFCC, but pages transcluding these special pages do not appear in database reports such as Misplaced Pages:Database reports/Pages containing an unusually high number of non-free files. I see that User:Vanischenu/specials has transcluded the special pages since July, so this would definitely have been spotted earlier if the database reports had listed this page. Do you know if there is some other way to find pages using non-free files by transcluding special pages? --Stefan2 (talk) 14:02, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
- I have no clue how to look for those kinds of things. Werieth (talk) 14:07, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
December 2013
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List of people from Bradford. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware, Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Andy Dingley (talk) 14:18, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
- Andy Dingley are you stupid or just being a WP:DICK? Also please stop stalking my edits. The removals in question are exempt from 3RR, Please see WP:3RRNO#5. The next time you warn me/revert without understanding NFCC I will be forced to seek a topic ban for you. Werieth (talk) 14:34, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
- Didn't you seek a topic ban for me last week, after your other two final warnings? As I recall, it ended with you being blocked again for edit-warring over NFCC.
- Edit-warring is edit-warring. It is disruptive to the smooth running of WP, including the NFCR board. Your edit-warring (which is self-evident, I'm not going to mince words) does nothing to further your assumed aim of ensuring that WP appropriately complies with its relevant policies, it merely sends everyone around in circles.
- NFCC is complex and subjective. These images include at least one major artwork by a notable artist, of a substantially notable individual subject. It's relevance per NFC is not cut and dried, it is precisely the sort of issue that does not "unquestionably violate" NFCC and 3RRNO#5. In addition, you have been frequently warned and even blocked over precisely that issue. Andy Dingley (talk) 19:29, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
- Actually List of people from Bradford is a cut and try case of unquestionable violation. I know the complexity of NFCC far far more than you do. Given your driveby WP:NFCR#File:10ontenshot.jpg_in_10_on_Ten.2C_in_reference_to_Cinematic_style_of_Abbas_Kiarostami actions and failure to understand NFCC, your stalking and harassment I will file a ban request for you if you continue your inappropriate actions. I have not requested any bans yet for you, just brought up the possibility several times given WP:CIR in regards to NFCC which you seem to be lacking. Werieth (talk) 19:34, 8 December 2013 (UTC)