Misplaced Pages

User talk:Roccodrift: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 05:59, 10 December 2013 editMilesMoney (talk | contribs)3,474 edits Notice← Previous edit Revision as of 06:05, 10 December 2013 edit undoRoccodrift (talk | contribs)682 edits What BRD means.: NopeNext edit →
Line 35: Line 35:


. This isn't part of BRD. Rather it's edit-warring. For additional policy violation, the comment ironically accused ''me'' of violating BRD. That's hilarious! ] (]) 05:56, 10 December 2013 (UTC) . This isn't part of BRD. Rather it's edit-warring. For additional policy violation, the comment ironically accused ''me'' of violating BRD. That's hilarious! ] (]) 05:56, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
:Wrong. The cycle started here with a bold edit , and you took your revert at the very next diff . If you wanted the safe harbor of BRD, that was where the discussion should have started. You didn't do that, instead you re-inserted the same material. That's edit warring. Now make your case in Talk and don't re-insert that material again until you gain consensus. ] (]) 06:05, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:05, 10 December 2013

Welcome!

Hello, Roccodrift, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for SlutWalk‎. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Auric talk 12:20, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Sock-puppet?

Your editing is precocious - see WP: PEH. Why? Hyper3 (talk) 11:14, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

December 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Families USA may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • web|url=http://usfinancepost.com/media-attempt-to-save-obamacare-with-positive-stories-10287.html}}</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:14, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Notice

You have been ordered not to post messages on my talk page unless you are required to. Hint: False notices are never required, or even allowed. I will delete all further comments from you without responding. MilesMoney (talk) 05:56, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

When I see you violate Misplaced Pages's BLP policy, I will post a warning on your page every time. I don't care if you respond or not. Roccodrift (talk) 05:59, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
I pardoned you so you could post on my talk page again. After you abused this privilege, I was forced to remove it. MilesMoney (talk) 05:59, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

ANI discussion involving you

I wanted to alert you to an on-going discussion at Admin's Noticeboard/Incidents. You are one of five editors to issue a behavior warning to MilesMoney. --HectorMoffet (talk) 09:22, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Not that it matters, but this was a violation of WP:CANVAS. MilesMoney (talk) 05:58, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

What BRD means.

This removed the material in question. It was the Bold step. This restored the material. It was the Revert step. This added a talk section about the material. It was the Discuss step. That's called WP:BRD.

This is where you removed it again. This isn't part of BRD. Rather it's edit-warring. For additional policy violation, the comment ironically accused me of violating BRD. That's hilarious! MilesMoney (talk) 05:56, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Wrong. The cycle started here with a bold edit , and you took your revert at the very next diff . If you wanted the safe harbor of BRD, that was where the discussion should have started. You didn't do that, instead you re-inserted the same material. That's edit warring. Now make your case in Talk and don't re-insert that material again until you gain consensus. Roccodrift (talk) 06:05, 10 December 2013 (UTC)