| Revision as of 02:39, 30 December 2013 editSPECIFICO (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users35,510 edits →Warning -- Presley AfD← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:55, 30 December 2013 edit undoCarolmooredc (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers31,944 edits →EW on Rothbard: also reminder MilesMoney banned from my talk page; i'm not a punching bag for you threeNext edit → | ||
| Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
| ::Now apologize to Steele. ] (]) 23:26, 29 December 2013 (UTC) | ::Now apologize to Steele. ] (]) 23:26, 29 December 2013 (UTC) | ||
| :::I quoted policy and it is clear Steeletrap's edit is the bold one. HW's is a revert. Steeletrap's is the edit war revert. Mine undid her edit war revert. By the time we go to you we definitely were in edit war territory. I certainly wouldn't mess with it again. Will wait til discussion and seek outside opinion if the opinions do not seem balanced/compliant with policy. Finding a better source always a better idea, but so many BLPs to deal with, can't spend as much time on non-BLPs. <small>'''] (])</small>''' 01:37, 30 December 2013 (UTC) | :::I quoted policy and it is clear Steeletrap's edit is the bold one. HW's is a revert. Steeletrap's is the edit war revert. Mine undid her edit war revert. By the time we go to you we definitely were in edit war territory. I certainly wouldn't mess with it again. Will wait til discussion and seek outside opinion if the opinions do not seem balanced/compliant with policy. Finding a better source always a better idea, but so many BLPs to deal with, can't spend as much time on non-BLPs. <small>'''] (])</small>''' 01:37, 30 December 2013 (UTC) | ||
| ::::Also, MilesMoney, please stay off my talk page unless you are initiating an official notice. Your post above could have been left on the talk page. <small>'''] (])</small>''' 02:55, 30 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:55, 30 December 2013
   I'm busy in the real world and don't get notifications so it may take a few days to get back if you want to contact me about the few abstruse articles I'm watching or may contribute to. Please post comments about the content of a specific article on the Talk Page of that Article if it is relevant to all editors.
|
|---|
 |
 | This user wants to see everything in its place. |
You're invited: Art & Feminism Edit-a-thon
| Art & Feminism Edit-a-Thon - You are invited! | |
|---|---|
| File:Csaky madonna.jpg | Hi Carolmooredc! The first ever Art and Feminism Edit-a-thon will be held on Saturday, February 1, 2014 across the United States and Canada - including Washington, D.C.! Wikipedians of all experience levels are welcome to join! Any editors interested in the intersection of feminism and art are welcome. Experienced editors will be on hand to help new editors. |
Anti-war projects?
notice you posted on he defunct Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Anti-war
I am looking to source Ploughshares Fund because large portions are getting deleted.
Can you point me to a Anti-war wikiproject,others who may help, or help me source this article? At the least watch the article?
Thank you! keep up the great work!
You may also be interested in WP:ARS. Igottheconch (talk) 06:59, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
- Here's a couple searches with good returns:
- Google_News_Archive is updating its engine so it's not available right now. But meanwhile you can search specific publications that might have some info Google Newspapers. Good luck! Carolmooredc (Talkie-Talkie) 18:48, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
Warning -- Presley AfD
You have misrepresented my statement in this edit. This is unaccepable. As a courtesy, I am posting this formal notice that you should remove/correct your false characterization of my post. I am prepared to seek enforcement of Community Sanctions if you do not stop violating civility and talk page policies. SPECIFICO talk 19:50, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
- My apologies. I changed to "my perception" thus we don't have to debate elsewhere whether or not my mere moore perception was correct or not. Carolmooredc (Talkie-Talkie) 19:53, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
Warning -- Defending the Undefendable
You have again misrepresented me here, snidely attributing to me an edit which I did not make. You should strike through your misrepresentation. If you do not, I will seek to have you blocked immediately per AEGS. If you ever misrepresent my words or actions in the future I will seek to have you blocked without further warning. 02:38, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
EW on Rothbard
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware, Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
Per BRD, you should use talk. Please undo this edit.
SPECIFICO talk 14:40, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
- Ok, reviewed Misplaced Pages:BRD#What_BRD_is.2C_and_is_not which reads: Note: "BRD" is commonly used to refer to the principle that a revert should not be reverted again by the same editors until the changes have been discussed, as that could constitute edit warring, which is a policy that all editors must follow. So Steeletrap was editwarring. I was not. So Steeltrap should get the warning. Thanks for making me go to WP:BRD. Carolmooredc (Talkie-Talkie) 17:50, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
- You are completely wrong and owe Steele an apology. This was the Bold edit, and it was bad. Steele Reverted it, which was good. Then you violated BRD by reverting to restore the original Bold edit, as opposed to Discussing. I was the one who opened a discussion.
- Now apologize to Steele. MilesMoney (talk) 23:26, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
- I quoted policy and it is clear Steeletrap's edit is the bold one. HW's is a revert. Steeletrap's is the edit war revert. Mine undid her edit war revert. By the time we go to you we definitely were in edit war territory. I certainly wouldn't mess with it again. Will wait til discussion and seek outside opinion if the opinions do not seem balanced/compliant with policy. Finding a better source always a better idea, but so many BLPs to deal with, can't spend as much time on non-BLPs. Carolmooredc (Talkie-Talkie) 01:37, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
- Also, MilesMoney, please stay off my talk page unless you are initiating an official notice. Your post above could have been left on the talk page. Carolmooredc (Talkie-Talkie) 02:55, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
- I quoted policy and it is clear Steeletrap's edit is the bold one. HW's is a revert. Steeletrap's is the edit war revert. Mine undid her edit war revert. By the time we go to you we definitely were in edit war territory. I certainly wouldn't mess with it again. Will wait til discussion and seek outside opinion if the opinions do not seem balanced/compliant with policy. Finding a better source always a better idea, but so many BLPs to deal with, can't spend as much time on non-BLPs. Carolmooredc (Talkie-Talkie) 01:37, 30 December 2013 (UTC)