| Revision as of 15:25, 1 January 2014 editSummerPhD (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers91,322 edits →Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Charlie's Angels film characters: c← Previous edit |
Revision as of 17:26, 1 January 2014 edit undoJerry Pepsi (talk | contribs)3,247 edits warn this ya pissy little bitchNext edit → |
| Line 4: |
Line 4: |
|
How do I make the reference section of an article split into two columns? ] (]) 02:59, 10 December 2013 (UTC) |
|
How do I make the reference section of an article split into two columns? ] (]) 02:59, 10 December 2013 (UTC) |
|
* Use {{Tlp|Reflist|2}} to make two columns. ] (]) 03:15, 10 December 2013 (UTC) |
|
* Use {{Tlp|Reflist|2}} to make two columns. ] (]) 03:15, 10 December 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
== Subcategorization == |
|
|
|
|
|
'''Please review''' Your are laudable and I personally agree with them but there is a convention to include all films by nationality in the upper-level categories. See e.g. ]. I think it's a bad idea but it's a pretty well-worn bad idea. —]<span style="color:red">❤]☮]☺]☯</span> 14:54, 11 December 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Vandalism == |
|
|
|
|
|
] Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Misplaced Pages, as you did to ], without giving a valid reason for the removal in the ]. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been ]. Please make use of the ] if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-delete2 --><br />] <sup> ] </sup> 21:33, 28 December 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. |
|
|
|
|
|
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> —''']''' (]) 21:51, 28 December 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Advice from someone more experienced == |
|
|
|
|
|
As we have disagreed a few times at AFD, you need not take this advice, but I earnestly encourage you make sure you fully understand Misplaced Pages's ] (with special attention paid to its sections ] and ]) ''before'' you select established articles for deletion. I do not wish to sound preachy, but deletion is really a last resort and used only for the truly '''un'''salvageable and only when ] have been exhausted. These are discussed at ] and in detail at ]. You've been around for nearly a year and have made almost edits, but there is no shame in asking for advice and there are others who have been here for many years who would be happy to help. See ], ], ], ] and ]. Hope you have a good 2014. Happy New Year. ''']''' '']'' 10:54, 31 December 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
:* Thank you, I am acquainted with the relevant policies and I don't believe I have made any deletion nomination that runs afoul of them. I always check multiple sourcing possibilities before nominating anything and if I find appropriate sourced material then I don't make the nomination. I think my track record on AFDs supports that I know what I'm doing. ] (]) 19:05, 31 December 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== ] == |
|
|
|
|
|
Please limit your discussion to why the article should be kept or deleted. Discuss content, not editors. Thanks. - ] (]) 04:59, 1 January 2014 (UTC) |
|
|
:As you seem to have (above), pleaswe consider this a warning: The AfD is for discussing whether or not the article in question should be deleted enot. ''Discuss content not editors.'' If you believe another editor's edits are problematic and are unsure where to address the issue, please ask. Thanks. - ] (]) 15:25, 1 January 2014 (UTC) |
|
