Misplaced Pages

Wiki-PR editing scandal: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:08, 8 January 2014 view sourceI'm not that crazy (talk | contribs)154 edits Not public relations, neither in the traditional sense, nor as described on the website of the firm.← Previous edit Revision as of 23:38, 8 January 2014 view source Smallbones (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers59,539 edits kohs not a reliable source, IBT summary was very biasedNext edit →
Line 25: Line 25:
}} }}


'''Wiki-PR''' is a ] that formerly marketed its ability to edit ]<ref name="vice_is">{{cite web|title=Is Misplaced Pages for Sale? |url=http://motherboard.vice.com/blog/is-wikipedia-for-sale|last=Robbins|first=Martin|date=2013-10-20|accessdate=2013-10-20|work=motherboard.vice.com|quote=We'll both directly edit your page using our network of established Misplaced Pages editors and admins}}</ref> and currently markets its ability to consult clients on how to interact with the Misplaced Pages community.<ref name= "Wiki-PR">{{cite web| url= http://wiki-pr.com/| title= Wiki-PR: The Misplaced Pages Consultants| work= Wiki-PR.com| accessdate= 2013-12-27|quote=We consult thousands of people and companies on how to interact with the Misplaced Pages community}}</ref> The company gained media attention in 2013 after reports suggested that as many as 300 suspected and six directly confirmed Misplaced Pages accounts were blocked for sockpuppetry in connection with the company.<ref name="vice_is"/> A later media report conducted by the ] suggested that a competitor, LegalMorning, was responsible for the many of the blocked accounts thought initially to be linked to Wiki-PR.<ref name="International Business">{{cite web|title=Misplaced Pages Sends Paid Editors Cease-And-Desist: Sockpuppet Account Morning277, Not Wiki-PR |url=http://www.ibtimes.com/wikipedia-sends-paid-editors-cease-desist-sockpuppet-account-morning277-not-wiki-pr-1482738 '''Wiki-PR''' is a ] that formerly marketed its ability to edit ]<ref name="vice_is">{{cite web|title=Is Misplaced Pages for Sale? |url=http://motherboard.vice.com/blog/is-wikipedia-for-sale|last=Robbins|first=Martin|date=2013-10-20|accessdate=2013-10-20|work=motherboard.vice.com|quote=We'll both directly edit your page using our network of established Misplaced Pages editors and admins}}</ref>. It was then banned, including all of its employees, contractors, and owners, by the Misplaced Pages community for unethical editing. Despite the ban, the firm currently markets its ability to consult clients on how to interact with the Misplaced Pages community.<ref name= "Wiki-PR">{{cite web| url= http://wiki-pr.com/| title= Wiki-PR: The Misplaced Pages Consultants| work= Wiki-PR.com| accessdate= 2013-12-27|quote=We consult thousands of people and companies on how to interact with the Misplaced Pages community}}</ref> The company gained media attention in 2013 after reports suggested that as many as 300 suspected and six directly confirmed Misplaced Pages accounts were blocked for sockpuppetry in connection with the company.<ref name="vice_is"/>
|last=Halleck|first=Thomas|date=2013-11-22|accessdate=2013-12-26|work=International Business Times}}</ref>


== Company == == Company ==
Line 36: Line 35:
An investigation of sockpuppet accounts on Misplaced Pages, beginning in 2012, implicated hundreds of accounts, with six accounts being traced back to Wiki-PR after four customers of Wiki-PR spoke anonymously to Daily Dot journalist Simon Owens, and two, ] and Emad Rahim, spoke to Vice journalist Martin Robbins.<ref name=Robbins>{{cite news|last=Robbins|first=Martin|title=Is the PR Industry Buying Influence Over Misplaced Pages?|url=http://www.vice.com/en_uk/read/is-the-pr-industry-buying-influence-over-wikipedia|accessdate=2013-10-19 |newspaper=VICE|date=2013-10-19}}</ref><ref name=Owens>{{cite news|last=Owens|first=Simon|title=The battle to destroy Misplaced Pages's biggest sockpuppet army |url=http://www.dailydot.com/lifestyle/wikipedia-sockpuppet-investigation-largest-network-history-wiki-pr/ |accessdate=2013-10-20 |newspaper=] |date=2013-10-08}}</ref> The use of a company to manage the content of Misplaced Pages violates several Misplaced Pages rules, including the rule against asserting ownership of a page, and has led to the Misplaced Pages community blocking hundreds of paid Misplaced Pages editing accounts believed to be connected with activities of Wiki-PR contrary to Misplaced Pages's rules.<ref name=Owens /><ref>{{cite news|url=http://newsfeed.time.com/2013/10/21/wikipedia-bans-250-users-for-posting-paid-promotional-entries/|title=Misplaced Pages Bans 250 Users for Posting Paid, Promotional Entries|last=Stampler|first=Laura|work=]|date=2013-10-21|accessdate=2013-11-19}}</ref> An investigation of sockpuppet accounts on Misplaced Pages, beginning in 2012, implicated hundreds of accounts, with six accounts being traced back to Wiki-PR after four customers of Wiki-PR spoke anonymously to Daily Dot journalist Simon Owens, and two, ] and Emad Rahim, spoke to Vice journalist Martin Robbins.<ref name=Robbins>{{cite news|last=Robbins|first=Martin|title=Is the PR Industry Buying Influence Over Misplaced Pages?|url=http://www.vice.com/en_uk/read/is-the-pr-industry-buying-influence-over-wikipedia|accessdate=2013-10-19 |newspaper=VICE|date=2013-10-19}}</ref><ref name=Owens>{{cite news|last=Owens|first=Simon|title=The battle to destroy Misplaced Pages's biggest sockpuppet army |url=http://www.dailydot.com/lifestyle/wikipedia-sockpuppet-investigation-largest-network-history-wiki-pr/ |accessdate=2013-10-20 |newspaper=] |date=2013-10-08}}</ref> The use of a company to manage the content of Misplaced Pages violates several Misplaced Pages rules, including the rule against asserting ownership of a page, and has led to the Misplaced Pages community blocking hundreds of paid Misplaced Pages editing accounts believed to be connected with activities of Wiki-PR contrary to Misplaced Pages's rules.<ref name=Owens /><ref>{{cite news|url=http://newsfeed.time.com/2013/10/21/wikipedia-bans-250-users-for-posting-paid-promotional-entries/|title=Misplaced Pages Bans 250 Users for Posting Paid, Promotional Entries|last=Stampler|first=Laura|work=]|date=2013-10-21|accessdate=2013-11-19}}</ref>
{{external media | width = 210px | align = right | audio1 = , ], interview with Simon Owens, October 24, 2013 }} {{external media | width = 210px | align = right | audio1 = , ], interview with Simon Owens, October 24, 2013 }}

A later investigation by the International Business Times found that Morning277, a prolific account thought to have been run by Wiki-PR, may not have been run by Wiki-PR but by a competitor from LegalMorning.com<ref name="International Business"/> In an interview with the IBT, Mike Wood, proprietor of LegalMorning.com, claimed that “Morning277 is my account, but I am not Wiki-PR nor do I have a relation with them…It was my original account on Misplaced Pages. The majority of the edits completed with this account were for free, non-paid edits. Very few edits were actually done for pay under this account.”<ref name="International Business"/>

The International Business Times stated that "the conclusions drawn by many media outlets (and Misplaced Pages’s investigators) are either oversimplified or dead wrong."<ref name="International Business"/>


In ''The Wall Street Journal'', French stated that Wiki-PR is a research and writing firm, counseling clients on "how to adhere to Misplaced Pages's rules." French stated that its paid work is part of the "fabric" of Misplaced Pages, complementing the work of unpaid volunteers. French acknowledged that Wiki-PR had sometimes made "bad calls" on notability of articles. However, French stated that Wiki-PR's editors are "real people and not sockpuppets."<ref name=wsj>{{cite web|last=Fowler|first=Geoffrey|title=Misplaced Pages Probes Suspicious Promotional Articles|url=http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2013/10/21/wikipedia-probes-suspicious-promotional-articles/|work=]|accessdate=2013-11-17|date=2013-10-21}}</ref> In ''The Wall Street Journal'', French stated that Wiki-PR is a research and writing firm, counseling clients on "how to adhere to Misplaced Pages's rules." French stated that its paid work is part of the "fabric" of Misplaced Pages, complementing the work of unpaid volunteers. French acknowledged that Wiki-PR had sometimes made "bad calls" on notability of articles. However, French stated that Wiki-PR's editors are "real people and not sockpuppets."<ref name=wsj>{{cite web|last=Fowler|first=Geoffrey|title=Misplaced Pages Probes Suspicious Promotional Articles|url=http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2013/10/21/wikipedia-probes-suspicious-promotional-articles/|work=]|accessdate=2013-11-17|date=2013-10-21}}</ref>
Line 45: Line 40:
== Misplaced Pages and Wikimedia reaction == == Misplaced Pages and Wikimedia reaction ==


As of October 25, 2013, Wiki-PR, including all of its employees, contractors, and owners, were {{srlink|Misplaced Pages:Banning policy|community banned}} from Misplaced Pages. This ban will last indefinitely, but may be appealed if they change their practices to meet certain standards of transparency and alignment with Misplaced Pages norms.<ref name=ban>{{cite web|title=Misplaced Pages:List of banned users|url=https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:List_of_banned_users&oldid=578665728#W|accessdate=2013-10-25}}</ref> ], executive director of the ], stated that the Foundation was "exploring our options".<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/wikipedia-we-have-blocked-250-sock-puppets-for-biased-editing-of-our-pages-8895112.html|title=Misplaced Pages: We have blocked 250 'sock puppets' for biased editing of our pages|last=Burrell|first=Ian|work=]|date=2013-10-21|accessdate=2013-11-19}}</ref> On November 19, 2013, Wikimedia's law firm, ], e-mailed<ref> {{cite web |url=https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/foundation/6/6b/2013-11-19_C%26D_letter_to_WikiPR_from_Cooley.pdf |title=C&D letter to WikiPR from Cooley |quote=Via Email }}</ref> a ] letter to Wiki-PR.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2013/11/19/wikimedia-steps-up-sockpuppet-fight/|title=Wikimedia Steps Up "Sockpuppet" Fight|last=Fowler|first=Geoffrey|work=]|date=2013-11-19|accessdate=2013-11-19}}</ref> French told '']'' that Wiki-PR "is working with the Wikimedia Foundation and its counsel to sort this out," and hoped to have further information in a week's time.<ref name="The Guardian-21-Nov-13">{{cite news|last=Arthur|first=Charles|title=Misplaced Pages sends cease-and-desist letter to PR firm offering paid edits to site|url=http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2013/nov/21/wikipedia-cease-and-desist-pr-firm-offering-paid-edits|accessdate=22 November 2013|newspaper=The Guardian|date=21 November 2013}}</ref> One week after Cooley's cease-and-desist correspondence was issued, an investigative writer at ] provided evidence that Cooley employees had likely been editing their own Misplaced Pages article, without disclosing their conflict of interest.<ref>''Wikimedia law firm fiddles Misplaced Pages and Jimmy Wales hides'', Gregory Kohs, 25 November 2013.</ref><!--Link to article (spam blacklisted): www.examiner.com/article/wikimedia-law-firm-fiddles-wikipedia-and-jimmy-wales-hides ...Someone may whitelist this particular link, if it is deemed relevant to the Misplaced Pages article. --> As of October 25, 2013, Wiki-PR, including all of its employees, contractors, and owners, were {{srlink|Misplaced Pages:Banning policy|community banned}} from Misplaced Pages. This ban will last indefinitely, but may be appealed if they change their practices to meet certain standards of transparency and alignment with Misplaced Pages norms.<ref name=ban>{{cite web|title=Misplaced Pages:List of banned users|url=https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:List_of_banned_users&oldid=578665728#W|accessdate=2013-10-25}}</ref> ], executive director of the ], stated that the Foundation was "exploring our options".<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/wikipedia-we-have-blocked-250-sock-puppets-for-biased-editing-of-our-pages-8895112.html|title=Misplaced Pages: We have blocked 250 'sock puppets' for biased editing of our pages|last=Burrell|first=Ian|work=]|date=2013-10-21|accessdate=2013-11-19}}</ref> On November 19, 2013, Wikimedia's law firm, ], e-mailed<ref> {{cite web |url=https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/foundation/6/6b/2013-11-19_C%26D_letter_to_WikiPR_from_Cooley.pdf |title=C&D letter to WikiPR from Cooley |quote=Via Email }}</ref> a ] letter to Wiki-PR.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2013/11/19/wikimedia-steps-up-sockpuppet-fight/|title=Wikimedia Steps Up "Sockpuppet" Fight|last=Fowler|first=Geoffrey|work=]|date=2013-11-19|accessdate=2013-11-19}}</ref> French told '']'' that Wiki-PR "is working with the Wikimedia Foundation and its counsel to sort this out," and hoped to have further information in a week's time.<ref name="The Guardian-21-Nov-13">{{cite news|last=Arthur|first=Charles|title=Misplaced Pages sends cease-and-desist letter to PR firm offering paid edits to site|url=http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2013/nov/21/wikipedia-cease-and-desist-pr-firm-offering-paid-edits|accessdate=22 November 2013|newspaper=The Guardian|date=21 November 2013}}</ref>


== References == == References ==

Revision as of 23:38, 8 January 2014

Wiki-PR
IndustryPublic relations
Founded2010
Founder
  • Jordan French
  • Darius Fisher
HeadquartersAustin, Texas, U.S.
Key people
  • Jordan French (CEO)
  • Darius Fisher (COO)
WebsiteWiki-PR.com

Wiki-PR is a consulting firm that formerly marketed its ability to edit Misplaced Pages. It was then banned, including all of its employees, contractors, and owners, by the Misplaced Pages community for unethical editing. Despite the ban, the firm currently markets its ability to consult clients on how to interact with the Misplaced Pages community. The company gained media attention in 2013 after reports suggested that as many as 300 suspected and six directly confirmed Misplaced Pages accounts were blocked for sockpuppetry in connection with the company.

Company

Wiki-PR was created in 2010 by Darius Fisher, its current COO (chief operating officer), and Jordan French, its current CEO (chief executive officer). Confirmed clients include Priceline and Emad Rahim, and suspected clients include Viacom among many others. The firm claimed to have administrator access enabling it to manage the Misplaced Pages presence of more than 12,000 clients. Wiki-PR has been reported to use "aggressive email marketing" to acquire new customers.

Investigation and company reaction

An investigation of sockpuppet accounts on Misplaced Pages, beginning in 2012, implicated hundreds of accounts, with six accounts being traced back to Wiki-PR after four customers of Wiki-PR spoke anonymously to Daily Dot journalist Simon Owens, and two, Priceline and Emad Rahim, spoke to Vice journalist Martin Robbins. The use of a company to manage the content of Misplaced Pages violates several Misplaced Pages rules, including the rule against asserting ownership of a page, and has led to the Misplaced Pages community blocking hundreds of paid Misplaced Pages editing accounts believed to be connected with activities of Wiki-PR contrary to Misplaced Pages's rules.

External audio
audio icon Public Relations and suspicious pages on Misplaced Pages, CBC Radio, interview with Simon Owens, October 24, 2013

In The Wall Street Journal, French stated that Wiki-PR is a research and writing firm, counseling clients on "how to adhere to Misplaced Pages's rules." French stated that its paid work is part of the "fabric" of Misplaced Pages, complementing the work of unpaid volunteers. French acknowledged that Wiki-PR had sometimes made "bad calls" on notability of articles. However, French stated that Wiki-PR's editors are "real people and not sockpuppets."

Misplaced Pages and Wikimedia reaction

As of October 25, 2013, Wiki-PR, including all of its employees, contractors, and owners, were community banned from Misplaced Pages. This ban will last indefinitely, but may be appealed if they change their practices to meet certain standards of transparency and alignment with Misplaced Pages norms. Sue Gardner, executive director of the Wikimedia Foundation, stated that the Foundation was "exploring our options". On November 19, 2013, Wikimedia's law firm, Cooley LLP, e-mailed a cease-and-desist letter to Wiki-PR. French told The Guardian that Wiki-PR "is working with the Wikimedia Foundation and its counsel to sort this out," and hoped to have further information in a week's time.

References

  1. "Wiki-PR: Misplaced Pages Writers For Hire". Wiki-PR.com. Retrieved 2013-10-22.
  2. "Misplaced Pages probe into paid-for 'sockpuppet' entries". BBC News. 2013-10-21. Retrieved 2013-10-22.
  3. ^ "Leadership". Wiki-PR.com. Retrieved 2013-10-20.
  4. ^ Robbins, Martin (2013-10-20). "Is Misplaced Pages for Sale?". motherboard.vice.com. Retrieved 2013-10-20. We'll both directly edit your page using our network of established Misplaced Pages editors and admins
  5. "Wiki-PR: The Misplaced Pages Consultants". Wiki-PR.com. Retrieved 2013-12-27. We consult thousands of people and companies on how to interact with the Misplaced Pages community
  6. "Wiki-PR homepage". Wiki-PR. Retrieved 2013-10-19.
  7. ^ Owens, Simon (2013-10-08). "The battle to destroy Misplaced Pages's biggest sockpuppet army". The Daily Dot. Retrieved 2013-10-20.
  8. Robbins, Martin (2013-10-19). "Is the PR Industry Buying Influence Over Misplaced Pages?". VICE. Retrieved 2013-10-19.
  9. Stampler, Laura (2013-10-21). "Misplaced Pages Bans 250 Users for Posting Paid, Promotional Entries". TIME. Retrieved 2013-11-19.
  10. Fowler, Geoffrey (2013-10-21). "Misplaced Pages Probes Suspicious Promotional Articles". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 2013-11-17.
  11. "Misplaced Pages:List of banned users". Retrieved 2013-10-25.
  12. Burrell, Ian (2013-10-21). "Misplaced Pages: We have blocked 250 'sock puppets' for biased editing of our pages". The Independent. Retrieved 2013-11-19.
  13. "C&D letter to WikiPR from Cooley" (PDF). Via Email
  14. Fowler, Geoffrey (2013-11-19). "Wikimedia Steps Up "Sockpuppet" Fight". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 2013-11-19.
  15. Arthur, Charles (21 November 2013). "Misplaced Pages sends cease-and-desist letter to PR firm offering paid edits to site". The Guardian. Retrieved 22 November 2013.

External links

Categories: