| Revision as of 20:47, 23 November 2013 edit65.205.13.26 (talk) Undid revision 582963550 by SummerPhD (talk)← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:12, 14 January 2014 edit undoSummerPhD (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers91,322 edits Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on Perri "Pebbles" Reid. (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == AN/I discussion == | == AN/I discussion == | ||
| http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#65.205.13.26_BLP_violations_at_Talk:Perri_.22Pebbles.22_Reid | http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#65.205.13.26_BLP_violations_at_Talk:Perri_.22Pebbles.22_Reid | ||
| == January 2014 == | |||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. | |||
| To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> '''''''PLEASE''''' discuss the issue on the article's talk page.'' ] (]) 22:12, 14 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :''If this is a ], and you did not make the edits, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> | |||
Revision as of 22:12, 14 January 2014
AN/I discussion
January 2014
Your recent editing history at Perri "Pebbles" Reid shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. ''PLEASE discuss the issue on the article's talk page. SummerPhD (talk) 22:12, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.