| Revision as of 01:12, 15 January 2014 editLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,293,067 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:TParis/Archive 12) (bot← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:29, 15 January 2014 edit undoCarolmooredc (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers31,944 edits Wikihounding by SPECIFICONext edit → | ||
| Line 61: | Line 61: | ||
| :::::I'd prefer you blocked since I'm not really around today. Only responding to talk page notices...--v/r - ]] 00:35, 14 January 2014 (UTC) | :::::I'd prefer you blocked since I'm not really around today. Only responding to talk page notices...--v/r - ]] 00:35, 14 January 2014 (UTC) | ||
| ::::::I was offline as well, but have now blocked the account. --]<sup>]</sup> 18:56, 14 January 2014 (UTC) | ::::::I was offline as well, but have now blocked the account. --]<sup>]</sup> 18:56, 14 January 2014 (UTC) | ||
| ==Wikihounding by SPECIFICO== | |||
| I left on SPECIFICO's talk page, which includes my previous June warning to him and related WP:ANI when he would not stop. Since you have discussed this kind of behavior with him previously, perhaps you could discourage him from it. This is the kind of badgering that made me angry enough to quit editing in the subject at all twice previously; but I find it difficult to ignore the policy issues in the articles being edited so have managed to return. Also note that all of the articles are regarding libertarians and/or under ]. Thanks. <small>'''] (])</small>''' 02:29, 15 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:29, 15 January 2014
| This is TParis's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
| Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 |
| If you have come here to change my opinion, be ready to also change yours. |
| USER PAGE | TALK PAGE | CONTRIBUTIONS | AWARDS | DASHBOARD | RECALL | MOTIVES | POLITICS | RTRC |
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Holiday wishes!
 |
I wish you success and happiness in your endeavours for this coming year, and I hope we'll be able to carry on improving the wonderful project that is Misplaced Pages together! Keep rocking on! :)
|
Merry Christmas!
Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Userfication
Hello. I would like to request userfication of deleted article named "Insurance Hotline" to my userspace User:BiH/Insurance_Hotline for improvements that will establish notability. Thank you. --BiH (talk) 17:54, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
- Done. Please have this article reviewed by someone else before moving it back to article space.--v/r - TP 21:25, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
Question
Would it be acceptable to remove the stale merge tag from both Ghost in the Shell and Ghost in the Shell (manga)? It has been there for months and over 250,000 readers have had a chance to see it. My last GAN passed and I want to get both of these to GA by March for the anniversary of Toren's passing. I wish I had more on Toren to. I think it might need to be closed, but I can neither request, interact or do anything which might seem to skirt the line here. It's rather degrading to have one of the most trafficked articles remain like this. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 05:50, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
- It wouldn't be appropriate for you to do it, no. But you can request WP:AN/RFC to get it closed.--v/r - TP 12:53, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
Sorry to say...
...but I think your good faith with regard to unblocking User:Nightskate has been wasted. Their contributions today have been bizarre (to say the least) and there unfortunately appears to be an element of WP:NOTTHERAPY. Your thoughts?--Jezebel'sPonyo 22:28, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
- WP:ROPE ;) --v/r - TP 22:42, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
- You really are a softie! Since being unblocked they've linked to a rambling Google forum post here and here, not to mention this indecipherable post here which also appears (if I'm reading it correctly) to contain a number of BLP violations regarding Robert Pirsig. I don't think we're doing the editor (or our articles) any favours by allowing them to apparently work through their real life issues here, but If you want to extend them even more rope I'll differ to your opinion. Cheers, --Jezebel'sPonyo 23:06, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
- Ohh no :) I meant that the rope had already been extended and they've hung themselves. :D--v/r - TP 23:48, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
- Thank the Lord. I was trying to imagine just how much rope you were willing to extend, and whether Nightskate would be able to use it to bind all the admins and proceed to drive us all mad(der) with their bizarre theories. Do you want me to block, or would you prefer to revoke the unblock? --Jezebel'sPonyo 23:57, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
- I'd prefer you blocked since I'm not really around today. Only responding to talk page notices...--v/r - TP 00:35, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
- I was offline as well, but have now blocked the account. --Jezebel'sPonyo 18:56, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
- I'd prefer you blocked since I'm not really around today. Only responding to talk page notices...--v/r - TP 00:35, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
- Thank the Lord. I was trying to imagine just how much rope you were willing to extend, and whether Nightskate would be able to use it to bind all the admins and proceed to drive us all mad(der) with their bizarre theories. Do you want me to block, or would you prefer to revoke the unblock? --Jezebel'sPonyo 23:57, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
- Ohh no :) I meant that the rope had already been extended and they've hung themselves. :D--v/r - TP 23:48, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
- You really are a softie! Since being unblocked they've linked to a rambling Google forum post here and here, not to mention this indecipherable post here which also appears (if I'm reading it correctly) to contain a number of BLP violations regarding Robert Pirsig. I don't think we're doing the editor (or our articles) any favours by allowing them to apparently work through their real life issues here, but If you want to extend them even more rope I'll differ to your opinion. Cheers, --Jezebel'sPonyo 23:06, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
Wikihounding by SPECIFICO
I left this warning about Wikihounding on SPECIFICO's talk page, which includes my previous June warning to him and related WP:ANI when he would not stop. Since you have discussed this kind of behavior with him previously, perhaps you could discourage him from it. This is the kind of badgering that made me angry enough to quit editing in the subject at all twice previously; but I find it difficult to ignore the policy issues in the articles being edited so have managed to return. Also note that all of the articles are regarding libertarians and/or under Austrian economics/General sanctions. Thanks. Carolmooredc (Talkie-Talkie) 02:29, 15 January 2014 (UTC)