| Revision as of 02:20, 7 September 2006 editJudgesurreal777 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers50,231 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 21:30, 15 January 2014 edit undoSjones23 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers101,807 edits update |
| (27 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
*Address FAR concerns |
|
* "Nineteen years after the formation of the Galactic Empire just as development has been completed on a weapon capable of destroying an entire planet, the Death Star." Is this a sentence? |
|
|
|
*Renominate for FA status when ready |
|
* "After American Graffiti debuted as the third highest grossing film of the year, Lucas received rave reviews. " Doesn't getting "rave reviews" usually mean the movie was well reviewed? And isn't the movie usually reviewed before its release? And when you say it "debuted as the third highest grossing film of the year," do you mean that on AG's debut weekend, it was already the year's top-grossing film, or was it not reckoned as the #3 film until the year was over? |
|
|
* "a "used universe" in which all devices, ships and buildings could be seen as having been logically built." Logically built? This is vague and hard to understand. |
|
|
* "Burtt ran "beeps and boops" of his own voice with an electronic synthesizer." Er, what did he do? |
|
|
* "According to Daniels, one of the major voice actors was impressed by his voice and recommended to Lucas that it be left in." The actor's own voice? Daniels' voice? Freberg's? |
|
|
*Inadequate range of references, relying entirely on the internet and a documentary. This was a major movie. What did the newspapers and film journals have to say about it? Books? It's dangerous to rely on such a narrow range of sources, as you're going to be reporting Burns's view not the NPO |
|