| Revision as of 20:09, 18 June 2006 editSettersr (talk | contribs)622 edits →Cursed News Group Discussion← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:17, 18 June 2006 edit undoSte4k (talk | contribs)3,630 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
| I have placed it under fraudulent curses and attached tags to it. Placing content in wikipedia to promote your newsgroup or some other non-neutral POV is against wikipedia policies] 20:09, 18 June 2006 (UTC) | I have placed it under fraudulent curses and attached tags to it. Placing content in wikipedia to promote your newsgroup or some other non-neutral POV is against wikipedia policies] 20:09, 18 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
| I moved your POV tags to the top of the page since your POV matches all of the various sub-topics. | |||
| I inserted the sub category Cursed New Groups since it hasn't anything to do with fraud. Please do not remove content from Misplaced Pages; it is considered ]. If you want to experiment, please use the ]. Thank you. <!-- Template:Test2a (Second level warning) --> | |||
| UseNet groups aren't owned or operated by any specific individual. The Google reference is more than likely | |||
| to remain archivable for quite a long time. I am not associated with Google whatsoever. The reference is | |||
| nuetral. If you would like to add a second source to balance the reference, that would be fine with me. ] 20:17, 18 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:17, 18 June 2006
RE: Esoteric Curse discussion in first part
I am to blame. Any comment? --John Meghly Xgenei 21:12, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
- lol, look what i found --Striver 05:24, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
Pls add
hex redirects here. Can we mention briefly the etymology?
- Please sign your comments. Rarr 00:52, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
Curse List
Is this list of curses really necessary? It seems like just a big list of diseases, practices, and uncontrollable events, and also its inclusion is somewhat POV. I've left it in for now but it may be a good idea to remove it at some point. Rarr 00:52, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
I don't understand your objection. The article is about curses in general and so it seems to me that the lists of kinds of curses (sorted both by culture of origin and by type of social venue in which the curse occurs) is the meat of the article. Curses are not about "uncontrollable events" in any case -- they are statements of intention. I deleted the long Christian screed today, however, in case you are interested. It was basically off-topic as it did not deal with a curse but rather with "sin." Catherineyronwode 03:48, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
- I wasn't referring to the list in general - more to the list in specific. Notice I said "this list of curses" rather than any list of curses. The revised list is good. Rarr 19:51, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
Cursed News Group Discussion
Message to person at 88.105.251.105 Added the cursed news group section. Is there some contention about this edit? Ste4k 22:05, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
Message to 88.105.251.105: Please do not remove content from Misplaced Pages; it is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Ste4k 19:43, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
Nothing to do with curse. Your additions have nothing to do with the heading "Cyrse" and are your personal POV on what is occurring on a newsgroup that does not have any relevence here.Settersr 19:55, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
On the contrary, the entry meets the specification of the defintion of "Curse" since it is a supernatural occurance. Please do not remove content from Misplaced Pages; it is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Ste4k 19:57, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
It is unverifiable. Unless you can provide verification then I object.Settersr 19:58, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
Verification is provided at the external link and is beyond the scope of this page. Ste4k 20:00, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
I have placed it under fraudulent curses and attached tags to it. Placing content in wikipedia to promote your newsgroup or some other non-neutral POV is against wikipedia policiesSettersr 20:09, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
I moved your POV tags to the top of the page since your POV matches all of the various sub-topics. I inserted the sub category Cursed New Groups since it hasn't anything to do with fraud. Please do not remove content from Misplaced Pages; it is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. UseNet groups aren't owned or operated by any specific individual. The Google reference is more than likely to remain archivable for quite a long time. I am not associated with Google whatsoever. The reference is nuetral. If you would like to add a second source to balance the reference, that would be fine with me. Ste4k 20:17, 18 June 2006 (UTC)