| Revision as of 16:22, 4 February 2014 editيوسف حسين (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users875 edits →Edit warring at Yemen← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:26, 4 February 2014 edit undoJpgordon (talk | contribs)Checkusers, Administrators82,300 edits →Edit warring at YemenNext edit → | ||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
| <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''48 hours''' for ], as you did at ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by adding the following text below this notice: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. However, you should read the ] first.<p>During a dispute, you should first try to ] and seek ]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. </p></div><!-- Template:uw-ewblock --> The full report of this case was at ], and can be viewed at . ] (]) 03:38, 4 February 2014 (UTC) | <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''48 hours''' for ], as you did at ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by adding the following text below this notice: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. However, you should read the ] first.<p>During a dispute, you should first try to ] and seek ]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. </p></div><!-- Template:uw-ewblock --> The full report of this case was at ], and can be viewed at . ] (]) 03:38, 4 February 2014 (UTC) | ||
| {{unblock| reason= I was not engaged in editwawing i only reverted the Yemen article 3 times in Feb 3 2014 The reason i said that i will not talk to "Afrocentrist" anymore is because it proved to be useless. This is not a theory as admin Ed Johnson said, they identify themselves as "pan Africanist". I talked to one admin to watch the page and stop them from removing content they do not like, but he did not respond for example, one of them removed this sentence without providing a coherent reason . The only reason behind his edit is the baseless and unfounded belief that Sheba was an African civilization. Why else would he remove that sentence? He removed a picture from the ancient history section for the same exact reason . I am the only one working on the Yemen article, non of them even tried to help me or contributed to the article usefully, their edits circled around Africa and Yemenis racial links! I had a long discussion with User:Midwayexpress here and it proved to be tiring, pointless and time consuming. They accused me first of having multiple accounts (which proved to be a lie ) and now of being racist. I did not had a ] in that case and this one. This block is not necessary since i have not damaged the article, i contributed to expand it as witnessed by its edit history. My grammar may not perfect since English is not my first language. Nevertheless, I am the only one expanding that article content. I did not disturb Misplaced Pages, i am simply trying to add information to the Yemen article. I am wiling to discuss anything with any editor but i hope that admins will be watching and monitoring the discussions. In the end, i am one person against a group of "pan Africanists" as they identify themselves --] (]) 06:28, 4 February 2014 (UTC)}} | {{unblock reviewed| reason= I was not engaged in editwawing i only reverted the Yemen article 3 times in Feb 3 2014 The reason i said that i will not talk to "Afrocentrist" anymore is because it proved to be useless. This is not a theory as admin Ed Johnson said, they identify themselves as "pan Africanist". I talked to one admin to watch the page and stop them from removing content they do not like, but he did not respond for example, one of them removed this sentence without providing a coherent reason . The only reason behind his edit is the baseless and unfounded belief that Sheba was an African civilization. Why else would he remove that sentence? He removed a picture from the ancient history section for the same exact reason . I am the only one working on the Yemen article, non of them even tried to help me or contributed to the article usefully, their edits circled around Africa and Yemenis racial links! I had a long discussion with User:Midwayexpress here and it proved to be tiring, pointless and time consuming. They accused me first of having multiple accounts (which proved to be a lie ) and now of being racist. I did not had a ] in that case and this one. This block is not necessary since i have not damaged the article, i contributed to expand it as witnessed by its edit history. My grammar may not perfect since English is not my first language. Nevertheless, I am the only one expanding that article content. I did not disturb Misplaced Pages, i am simply trying to add information to the Yemen article. I am wiling to discuss anything with any editor but i hope that admins will be watching and monitoring the discussions. In the end, i am one person against a group of "pan Africanists" as they identify themselves --] (]) 06:28, 4 February 2014 (UTC)|decline=You were edit warring, plain and simple. That you did not reach 4 reverts does not mean you were not edit warring; it meant that you were carefully edit warring so as not to trigger the automatic block, but you were indeed edit warring. If you don't get satisfaction or gain consensus on the article talk page, the solution for you is to keep talking, not to keep reverting the article. ]<sup><small>]</small></sup> 16:26, 4 February 2014 (UTC)}} | ||
| :This block can be lifted if you will agree to wait for a talk page consensus before reverting again at ]. ] (]) 14:41, 4 February 2014 (UTC) | :This block can be lifted if you will agree to wait for a talk page consensus before reverting again at ]. ] (]) 14:41, 4 February 2014 (UTC) | ||
| :: That's what i said, i was and still always willing to discuss anything with any editor, but i hope that discussions will receive some attention by admins in the future. Next time i will notify an admin to monitor any discussion that i feel have reached a dead end--] (]) 15:45, 4 February 2014 (UTC) | :: That's what i said, i was and still always willing to discuss anything with any editor, but i hope that discussions will receive some attention by admins in the future. Next time i will notify an admin to monitor any discussion that i feel have reached a dead end--] (]) 15:45, 4 February 2014 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 16:26, 4 February 2014
 Archives |
Welcome
Hello, يوسف حسين, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The Five Pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page
- Editing tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Simplified Manual of Style
We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 17:52, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
February 2014
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Misplaced Pages, as you did at Yemen, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Middayexpress (talk) 15:24, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
A complaint at WP:AN3 mentions you
Please see WP:AN3#User:يوسف حسين reported by User:Middayexpress (Result: ). It is claimed that you have been edit warring at Yemen. If the assertion is valid then you've already broken the WP:3RR rule and are at risk of being blocked. You may respond to the complaint if you wish. EdJohnston (talk) 17:33, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Edit warring at Yemen
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
The full report of this case was at WP:AN3, and can be viewed at this permanent link. EdJohnston (talk) 03:38, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
يوسف حسين (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I was not engaged in editwawing i only reverted the Yemen article 3 times in Feb 3 2014 The reason i said that i will not talk to "Afrocentrist" anymore is because it proved to be useless. This is not a theory as admin Ed Johnson said, they identify themselves as "pan Africanist". I talked to one admin to watch the page and stop them from removing content they do not like, but he did not respond for example, one of them removed this sentence without providing a coherent reason . The only reason behind his edit is the baseless and unfounded belief that Sheba was an African civilization. Why else would he remove that sentence? He removed a picture from the ancient history section for the same exact reason . I am the only one working on the Yemen article, non of them even tried to help me or contributed to the article usefully, their edits circled around Africa and Yemenis racial links! I had a long discussion with User:Midwayexpress here and it proved to be tiring, pointless and time consuming. They accused me first of having multiple accounts (which proved to be a lie ) and now of being racist. I did not had a chance to reply in that case and this one. This block is not necessary since i have not damaged the article, i contributed to expand it as witnessed by its edit history. My grammar may not perfect since English is not my first language. Nevertheless, I am the only one expanding that article content. I did not disturb Misplaced Pages, i am simply trying to add information to the Yemen article. I am wiling to discuss anything with any editor but i hope that admins will be watching and monitoring the discussions. In the end, i am one person against a group of "pan Africanists" as they identify themselves --يوسف حسين (talk) 06:28, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You were edit warring, plain and simple. That you did not reach 4 reverts does not mean you were not edit warring; it meant that you were carefully edit warring so as not to trigger the automatic block, but you were indeed edit warring. If you don't get satisfaction or gain consensus on the article talk page, the solution for you is to keep talking, not to keep reverting the article. --jpgordon 16:26, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- This block can be lifted if you will agree to wait for a talk page consensus before reverting again at Yemen. EdJohnston (talk) 14:41, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
- That's what i said, i was and still always willing to discuss anything with any editor, but i hope that discussions will receive some attention by admins in the future. Next time i will notify an admin to monitor any discussion that i feel have reached a dead end--يوسف حسين (talk) 15:45, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
- If three editors and an admin are telling you in both words and actions that the edit is fine while yours isn't (as is the situation here), then that's not a "dead-end". That's consensus against your edit. Per WP:TENDENTIOUS, you'll just have to learn to accept that rather than WP:ADMINSHOP. Middayexpress (talk) 16:01, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
- No admin had said that your edits are fine and mine are not, one preferred your friend's because he thought the grammar was better but he did not give an opinion regarding the material accuracy. My edits were not bias in any shape or form because they were properly sourced now unless there is another source to debunk mine, bring it to the table instead of accusing me of being biased. I am not planing on "Admin shopping" i was referring to Misplaced Pages:Dispute_resolution. Just to see what i am dealing with here --يوسف حسين (talk) 16:07, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
- If three editors and an admin are telling you in both words and actions that the edit is fine while yours isn't (as is the situation here), then that's not a "dead-end". That's consensus against your edit. Per WP:TENDENTIOUS, you'll just have to learn to accept that rather than WP:ADMINSHOP. Middayexpress (talk) 16:01, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
- That's what i said, i was and still always willing to discuss anything with any editor, but i hope that discussions will receive some attention by admins in the future. Next time i will notify an admin to monitor any discussion that i feel have reached a dead end--يوسف حسين (talk) 15:45, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Yemen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Albanian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 4 February 2014 (UTC)