Misplaced Pages

:Featured list candidates/Dan Savage bibliography/archive1: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Featured list candidates Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:18, 6 February 2014 editCirt (talk | contribs)199,086 edits Comments by DragonZero: re← Previous edit Revision as of 01:33, 6 February 2014 edit undoDragonZero (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers26,146 edits Comments by DragonZeroNext edit →
Line 20: Line 20:


====Comments by DragonZero==== ====Comments by DragonZero====
<!-- cap created with ] -->
*<s>Uncertain about this but "The Washington Post reported that according to Nielsen BookScan approximately ", there should be a comma between BookScan and approximately.</s>
{{hidden/FC|headerstyle=background:#ccf;|contentstyle=border:1px #ccf solid; padding:10px;|header=Resolved comments from ] (]&nbsp;'''·''' ]) 01:33, 6 February 2014 (UTC)|content=*<s>Uncertain about this but "The Washington Post reported that according to Nielsen BookScan approximately ", there should be a comma between BookScan and approximately.</s>
*<s>Ref 2 redirects, needs an updated link (<nowiki>http://www.altweeklies.com/aan/dan-savage-takes-editorial-reins-at-the-stranger/Article?oid=1151</nowiki> is the current one)</s> *<s>Ref 2 redirects, needs an updated link (<nowiki>http://www.altweeklies.com/aan/dan-savage-takes-editorial-reins-at-the-stranger/Article?oid=1151</nowiki> is the current one)</s>
:*Still not updated. :*Still not updated.
Line 35: Line 36:
*<s>Ref 105 needs an updated link</s> *<s>Ref 105 needs an updated link</s>
*<s>Third to last bibliography needs an updated link</s> *<s>Third to last bibliography needs an updated link</s>
*}}
*| deadurl=no for active sites with archive references

] (]&nbsp;'''·''' ]) 09:38, 4 February 2014 (UTC) *'''Tentative support''' Refs are completely fine now. I don't have any remaining issues, but I agree with Bencherlite's judgement. When he supports the list, consider my support there too. ] (]&nbsp;'''·''' ]) 01:33, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
:Thanks very much for the helpful comments, {{u|DragonZero}}, I shall address them soon and respond back here. &mdash; ''']''' (]) 13:09, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
::Okay, {{u|DragonZero}}, these are now all '''done'''. &mdash; ''']''' (]) 21:02, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
:::{{u|DragonZero}}, please note that Ref 2 now is archived through ] so the original link is given for edification purposes only. Hopefully this is now satisfactory? &mdash; ''']''' (]) 08:55, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
::::Thank you for the clarification, {{u|DragonZero}}, all of the above should now be '''done.''' &mdash; ''']''' (]) 12:18, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
::::: What about deadurl=no? ] (]&nbsp;'''·''' ]) 00:38, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
::::::'''Done.''' Thank you for the reminder, {{u|DragonZero}}, I've since added deadurl=no to those cites. Should all now be addressed. Cheers, &mdash; ''']''' (]) 01:18, 6 February 2014 (UTC)


====Comments from Bencherlite==== ====Comments from Bencherlite====

Revision as of 01:33, 6 February 2014

Dan Savage bibliography

Dan Savage bibliography (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Toolbox
Nominator(s): Cirt and The Rambling Man. — Cirt (talk) 12:48, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

I was inspired to create this page after seeing George Orwell bibliography which was brought to FL quality by koavf. Prior to this nomination, the most recent quality improvement step for this page was a Peer Review with helpful participation from Joe Decker and koavf. Before that, it had survived an attempt at deletion with unanimous "Keep" participation aside from the nominator, and a prior peer review.

My thanks to The Rambling Man who helped mentor me through the quality improvement process for Dan Savage bibliography. — Cirt (talk) 12:43, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Notified: User talk:Cirt, Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Bibliographies, Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Media, Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject LGBT studies, Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Lists, Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Journalism, Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Literature, Talk:Dan Savage bibliography, Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Books. — Cirt (talk) 12:50, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Yes, thank you, Crisco 1492, ArbCom passed that motion linked above, which specifically allows me to perform a quality improvement project to attempt to bring this page to WP:FL quality. Thanks Crisco 1492 for that link, — Cirt (talk) 13:05, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Comments by DragonZero

Resolved comments from DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 01:33, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
*Uncertain about this but "The Washington Post reported that according to Nielsen BookScan approximately ", there should be a comma between BookScan and approximately.
  • Ref 2 redirects, needs an updated link (http://www.altweeklies.com/aan/dan-savage-takes-editorial-reins-at-the-stranger/Article?oid=1151 is the current one)
  • Still not updated.
  • Ref 7 needs an updated link
  • Ref 29 is dead?
  • Ref 40 needs an updated link
  • Ref 83 needs an updated link
  • Ref 86 needs an updated link
  • Ref 88 is dead
  • Ref 101 needs an updated link
  • Ref 102 needs an updated link
  • Ref 104 needs an updated link
  • Ref 105 needs an updated link
  • Third to last bibliography needs an updated link

Comments from Bencherlite

Lead

  • Not a great fan of the opening line: "The bibliography of Dan Savage includes six books and an edited compilation book, chapter contributions to eleven books, op-ed pieces in The New York Times, and an advice column on sexual issues in The Stranger written by the American author Dan Savage (b. 1964)." Which basically boils down to "The bibliography of Dan Savage includes stuff written by Dan Savage", which is circular and doesn't tell us what The Stranger is. Don't worry about having to have something there in bold. How about this as the first paragraph: "The American author Dan Savage (born 1964) has written six books, op-ed pieces in the New York Times, and an advice column on sexual issues in The Stranger (an alternative newspaper from Seattle, Washington). He began contributing a column, Savage Love, to The Stranger ..."
  • Third paragraph of the lead: "Savage's 2005 book The Commitment: Love, Sex, Marriage, and My Family recounting his personal experience deciding to marry his partner Terry Miller and analyzing same-sex marriage, reached The New York Times Best Seller list." needs a comma before "recounting".

Background:

  • overlinking (Catholic, bachelor's degree, theater)
  • Perhaps mention where The Stranger is based here
  • The Kid: What Happened after " does not use the same capitals as our article about it (I think you need a capital "A" in "After" to avoid the redirect"

Works

  • The Kid - as before, check capitals
  • Overlinking galore throughout the rest of the lists(s). The NYT and The NYT Company are each linked over 15 times; repeated links for Dutton; Seattle; MTV; YouTube; Savage Love; etc etc etc etc. Useful links are just drowned in a sea of blue. If the lists were sortable, then there would be a reason for repeating the links, but I can't see why every article he's written for the NYT, for example, needs repeated bluelinks. Nor do I think we need "Savage, Dan" at the front of every one. Other featured bibliographies manage without this.
  • Low value links e.g. three different links in the six words "Master of Communications in Digital Media", none of which are very useful.
  • Watch for unnecessary repetition - in the "books edited" section, for instance, we read a lot of stuff for the third time (lead; background; books edited). That's one too many, I think - either in the background, or the books edited section, but not both.
  • Television - what's referencing these appearances? Is there anything to be said about them?
  • Plays - you sometimes link the original work, sometimes not.
  • "was credited as: Keenan Hollahan" - why the colon?

Further reading

  • Why so many other sources here? If they belong in his article, then fine, but this is a bibliography not a proxy-biography.

This is not a full review but I think there's still a lot to be done. Bencherlite 00:24, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Understood, thank you, Bencherlite, I will get on addressing above soon, and respond back here when done. — Cirt (talk) 01:24, 5 February 2014 (UTC)