Misplaced Pages

:Requests for comment/Media, the arts, and architecture: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 04:34, 19 June 2006 editAndrew Parodi (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users6,627 edits Talk:Jesus Christ as source of "A Course in Miracles"← Previous edit Revision as of 13:49, 19 June 2006 edit undoNandesuka (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users13,890 edits WizardNext edit →
Line 2: Line 2:
{{RFCheader|Media, art, and literature}} {{RFCheader|Media, art, and literature}}
<!--<nowiki>Add new items at the TOP. Use ~~~~~ (five tildes) to sign </nowiki>--> <!--<nowiki>Add new items at the TOP. Use ~~~~~ (five tildes) to sign </nowiki>-->
*] - More than half of the article is a laundry list. Then, to make things worse, edit warring over the laundry list is occuring. Any help is appreciated. ] 13:49, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
*] - Help with copy editing regarding (admittedly complicated) issue with regard to the author of ''A Course In Miracles''. We have an edit war on our hands, up to two and three revisions per day with no apparent end in sight. -- 04:34, 19 June 2006 (UTC) *] - Help with copy editing regarding (admittedly complicated) issue with regard to the author of ''A Course In Miracles''. We have an edit war on our hands, up to two and three revisions per day with no apparent end in sight. -- 04:34, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
*] - Should this article be split into seperate articles (] and ])? --] 13:17, 18 June 2006 (UTC) *] - Should this article be split into seperate articles (] and ])? --] 13:17, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:49, 19 June 2006

Shortcut
  • ]

Template:RFCheader

  • Talk:Daedalus class battlecruiser -- should possible spoiler content be hidden from view as white text on a white background. 02:53, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Talk:Sharon Stone -- dispute over whether a screenshot from Basic Instinct showing Stone's genitalia should be included. 16:35, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Talk:DHARMA Initiative stations -- dispute regarding the addition of subsections under "Purpose of the station". 12:28, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Talk:Ctrl+Alt+Del -- Disagreement over whether Winter-een-mas should have its own page, I believe there is more information now and it should, despite a previous decision for deletion (which was based on a merge that didnt happen). 12:24, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Talk:Giacomo Puccini -- disagreement over what should be the primary name of Messa (vs. Messa di Gloria), I believe the popular usage should previal (with explanations and warnings on "technical" name), whereas other user believes the technical name should prevail. Revolver 03:17, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Talk:Nicolas_Flamel_(Harry_Potter) Is this character close enough to the real alchemist of the same name to merge the pages? Is he a significant enough character to have his own page? Nick 04:40, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Talk:Liberal bias Should Liberal bias article exist, or should it redirect to Media bias in the United States? 17:34, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Winter-een-mas I think there is a lot more information available now, and the subject is worth its own article again, as the CAD article doesn't have much detail. Our work on it has been reverted to a redirect again based on a previous decision I believe is outdated now. 03:49, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Talk:Antony and Cleopatra Should a conspiracy theory about Antony and Cleopatra containing references to Freemasonry be explained on the page? 17:05, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Talk:Ahmed Osman - A multiple-revert situation in which one editor wishes to use archaic spellings like Ægyptian while others wish to use modern spellings like Egyptian. 05:02, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Talk:Lolicon - Should the link to the Renchan Lolicon Community (Note: viewing images at this site may be illegal in your jurisdiction) be kept in the article, or deleted? The site in question contains drawings of very young children naked, in suggestive poses, and/or engaged in sex.
  • Image talk:DavidTibet.jpg. A dispute about whether the image qualifies for fair-use or not. IFD nomination gathered no discussion, hence the image stayed. Needs more debate than the two parties currently involved. 04:58, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Talk:Clive Bull A dispute has arisen over an edit which a number of different IP addresses keep reverting, while other editors feel the new version is more neutral and encyclopaedic. This is the version suggested by Minglex, this is the version the IPs keep reverting back to. The dispute has been entangled with a hoax perpetrated on the article of fellow LBC DJ Iain Lee, in which one or more vandals went to elaborate lengths to convince other editors that Lee had come out as gay on air (he had not), including creating sockpuppet accounts and accounts that impersonated established Misplaced Pages editors. The sockpuppet and impersonation accounts took the side of the anonymous editors in this dispute. The anons claim to be editing from shared IPs and that this is coincidental. We need some more eyes on this in order to form an indisputable consensus one way or the other. --Sam Blanning 14:57, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Does the image in JSTOR look better on the left side or right side of the page? Small question, 12+ month long debate. Your thoughts welcome! -- Stbalbach 18:24, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Talk:The Romantics Grammar: "The Romantics is..." or "The Romantics are..."? 17:44, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Talk:A Turning Point in National History. This is an article on a Dutch book with no English translation and someone therefore suggests it should be deleted because there is no verifiable English source. The counterargument is that that would mean there shouldn't be any articles on, say, English books in the Dutch Misplaced Pages. The preceding discussion has been very long, but this is what it has come down to now. 11:00, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Talk:The Rolling Stones Grammar: "The Rolling Stones is..." or "The Rolling Stones are..."? 18:23, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Talk:Lost (TV Series)-Episode Summary Trivia Dispute over whether or not a trivia element is verifiable and relevant in the context of a television show. Issue Summary 22:15, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
  • talk:Nataliya Dmytruk (also see these comments in edit history). The subject of the article is a notable (see article) sign-language interpreter who works on television providing translation of the newscasts into the sign language (for the deaf viewers). Is it correct to add her to a cat:Journalists in addition to "cat:Television personalities"? Her notability, as well as belonging to the TV-personalities cat, is not challenged by either side. The dispute is only the applicability of the "Journalists" cat. One user persists in using cat:Journalists even after an uninvolved user prompted by WP:3O agreed that journalists cat isn't applcaible. 23:52, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
Categories: