Revision as of 16:56, 8 February 2014 editDiannaa (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators349,411 edits →User:Yatzhek: focus on the content← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:05, 8 February 2014 edit undoSuppcuzz (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,008 edits →User:YatzhekNext edit → | ||
Line 200: | Line 200: | ||
], calling people a racist is unacceptable; it's a personal attack, and treating your fellow editors that way could lead to you being blocked from editing. Please focus your work on the content and do not speculate on other editor's motivations. -- ] (]) 16:56, 8 February 2014 (UTC) | ], calling people a racist is unacceptable; it's a personal attack, and treating your fellow editors that way could lead to you being blocked from editing. Please focus your work on the content and do not speculate on other editor's motivations. -- ] (]) 16:56, 8 February 2014 (UTC) | ||
:::: @ ] - and is that OK that he is using you to gove me a warning? Why can he lie about me while i have some proves that he is ignorant. If he is not, than why is he deleting all the data about Poles only, not Serbs, not Russians, but only about Poles - the second largest group of WWII victims right after the Jews? @ ] - i called your data "white-supremacist" because it reminds me of Stormfront forum, where Americans try to make "Aryans" our of Slavic people, and deny the fact that Germans killed 2 million Poles and persecuted the whole nation. It was all race-based. Not politically-based. Race-based hate is called racism and Poles were one of the victims. I dont want to argue no more. I am tired. Do what you want, change it as you wish, you won. I am not strong enough to keep the truth and historical facts on Misplaced Pages. Go and write your own history. Bye. ] (]) 17:05, 8 February 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:05, 8 February 2014
Skip to the bottom ⇩ · It is 7:31 PM where this user lives in Alberta.
Thanks for the deletionThanks for deleting the edits on my page. There is another one by the same user speculating on my real-world employment - would you be able to remove that one as well? StAnselm (talk) 03:53, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
Early Himmler photoDiannaa: could you look at the suggested early photo of Himmler which Hoops recommended for use in Himmler's article to see if it can be used therein. You know free use/fair use issues MUCH better than myself. Thank you in advance for input, Kierzek (talk) 16:44, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
The Signpost: 29 January 2014
Falkland Islands, small returnI mentioned that batch of Falkland Islands copy vios here, as an editor peripherally involved by restoring some of the bad copy has stated they wanting to get more involved in the pages again. As he was topic-banned for other reasons for the time we removed it, I thought I'd point it out so it's clear. I don't see that you'd have a strong opinion about this, but then I thought I should tell you on the chance you thought I framed it incorrectly there. __ E L A Q U E A T E 22:28, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
GAN Backlog Drive Award
Thanks! -- Diannaa (talk) 19:39, 3 February 2014 (UTC) The Signpost: 29 January 2014
GOCE January drive
Thanks! -- Diannaa (talk) 19:39, 3 February 2014 (UTC) Complex regional pain syndromeI have NO clue as to how to PM people on this stupid Misplaced Pages thing. Diana, please email me at exoskeleton aaaaaaaat gmx doooooot de. I would like to discuss the changes on the CRPS page with you. Parts of it are now a real mess for the sake of brevity.----rolander0001
A barnstar for you!
Thank you! -- Diannaa (talk) 02:57, 7 February 2014 (UTC) User:YatzhekDiannaa I was wondering if you can help me please, the user Yatzhek is continuing to revert an edit by themselves which is not correct and I have tried to create a talk section on the article and the users talk page but I am just getting personally attacked and the edit reverted back. The two discussions can be found here Talk:Black_people_in_Nazi_Germany#Ethnic_Poles]] and User_talk:Yatzhek#Ethnic_Poles_were_Aryans. I have given evidence that Poles were 'Aryan' but the user is continuing to reply without any genuine text or any sources and is reverting back to the article that is incorrect. The reasons for the reverts can be found https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Black_people_in_Nazi_Germany&action=history and the user is not actually debating but rather just reverting back without any sources given, the source given does not state what the user is trying to keep into the article. When providing evidence I am getting replies like "Please stop littering my wall with tons of information which you don't understand."here Could you be willing to help please?--Windows66 (talk) 14:32, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
I've reported the user to the noticeboard here for lack of cooperation and simply reverting the article and personal attacks such as: "I have an irresistable feeling that you are trying to "steer" the historical truth. You are from England, so you are either anti-Polish racist and hate the fact that Poles suffered racial persecution in their own country, or you are Polish and strongly want to be a full-fledged member of the Stormfront forum. That's all. Thank you." " How dare you discredit the Polish suffering during the Shoa by saying that Poles were treated as Aryans? https://en.wikipedia.org/Holocaust_victims - Hope you read the whole of my message and educate yourself. Thank you." It might be nothing but I have noticed User:Tobby72 is doing exactly what User:Yatzhek is doing and copying and pasting material from one articles talk page to another, could you check these are not the same person please? I have a funny feeling it is.--Windows66 (talk) 16:05, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
Could just be a coincidence that both of them copied and pasted the same thing twice into different articles. Multiple people are not telling me that I am wrong about Poles being Aryan, the user Tobby72 does not seem to be agreeing with the user Yatzhek that Poles were "racially non-Aryan" in the slightest, nor that "only Germans were Aryans according to Nazi ideology" (words of Yatzhek), in fact Tobby72 does not dispute Poles were Aryan (not that I am aware of), they were put into the 'Aryan side' of ghettos, the ancestors passport mentioned Poles and no "racial theory" could be found against Poles to satisfy the Nazis racial theories. There doesn't seem to be any issue with other Misplaced Pages editors that Poles were Aryan but the user Yatzhek refuses to admit this and when evidence is given his/her way the user resorts to personal attacks and insults.--Windows66 (talk) 16:20, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
The personal attacks are continuing, I've placed it in the ANI complaint.--Windows66 (talk) 16:36, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
I don't take kindly to being called a "racist" and I am NOT anti-Polish so stop saying both of these things. I only delete information that is not verified by academic genuine sources. I have showed you information on why the removal was necessary; on the basis of "race" no Nazi racial theory could be used for the discrimination against the ethnic Poles and they were racially regarded the same as Germans. The whole problem started with stuff like "non-Aryans along with Jews, Poles" being added into articles when firstly it is incorrect and secondly the source given does not even mention Poles. I deleted the "ethnic Poles" from the beginning because the racism against Poles was not 'race based' as they were essentially the same race as the Germans and the Nuremberg Laws classified Gypsies as race enemies which is why I left the text "Gypsies" still there. Please show me where I have put any white-supremacist data into any article, talk page or anywhere on Misplaced Pages? This sort of stuff should not be taken lightly to say to another, please provide evidence of this. I AM DYING FOR YOU TO SHOW ME THIS. If you actually went ahead and looked at my contributions, I have actually contributed to crimes against Poles by the Nazis.--Windows66 (talk) 16:52, 8 February 2014 (UTC) Yatzhek, calling people a racist is unacceptable; it's a personal attack, and treating your fellow editors that way could lead to you being blocked from editing. Please focus your work on the content and do not speculate on other editor's motivations. -- Diannaa (talk) 16:56, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
|