| Revision as of 17:59, 12 February 2014 editManul (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers8,647 edits just in it for the book← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:45, 14 February 2014 edit undoAskahrc (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,228 edits →Lack of Consensus: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | For your great efforts in removing vandalism from Misplaced Pages. Thanks. Your request was approved by Admrboltz. Keep up the good work. ]<sup>]</sup> 17:12, 12 February 2014 (UTC) | |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | For your great efforts in removing vandalism from Misplaced Pages. Thanks. Your request was approved by Admrboltz. Keep up the good work. ]<sup>]</sup> 17:12, 12 February 2014 (UTC) | ||
| |} | |} | ||
| == Lack of Consensus == | |||
| Since this is not directly pertinent to the ] article's improvement, I wanted to post here that I find your conduct on that page to be violating ]. I have reached out for compromise numerous times without avail; almost every time you've deleted any changes that you didn't write yourself, often without addressing the reasons for my changes that I put on Talk. If I was some crackpot trying to write that Sheldrake was a visionary, that would be one thing, but my edits have been for quotation accuracy, categorization of terms and other efforts at NPOV improvements. This has been recurring for some time and is not conducive to a collaborative editing environment. ] (]) 18:45, 14 February 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:45, 14 February 2014
| ||
| I only came here for the book. |
archive
Your request for rollback
Hi Manul. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
- Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
- Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
- Rollback should never be used to edit war.
- If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
- Use common sense.
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Misplaced Pages:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! AdmrBoltz 17:02, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
| For your great efforts in removing vandalism from Misplaced Pages. Thanks. Your request was approved by Admrboltz. Keep up the good work. Ethically 17:12, 12 February 2014 (UTC) |
Lack of Consensus
Since this is not directly pertinent to the Rupert Sheldrake article's improvement, I wanted to post here that I find your conduct on that page to be violating WP:OWN. I have reached out for compromise numerous times without avail; almost every time you've deleted any changes that you didn't write yourself, often without addressing the reasons for my changes that I put on Talk. If I was some crackpot trying to write that Sheldrake was a visionary, that would be one thing, but my edits have been for quotation accuracy, categorization of terms and other efforts at NPOV improvements. This has been recurring for some time and is not conducive to a collaborative editing environment. The Cap'n (talk) 18:45, 14 February 2014 (UTC)