Misplaced Pages

:Requests for comment/Society, law, and sex: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:13, 20 June 2006 editPierreLarcin2 (talk | contribs)487 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 22:46, 20 June 2006 edit undoBridesmill (talk | contribs)3,469 edits consise. not need to embarass anyone here. let RfC respondent make up own mindNext edit →
Line 3: Line 3:
<!--<nowiki>Add new items at the TOP. Use ~~~~~ (five tildes) to sign </nowiki>--> <!--<nowiki>Add new items at the TOP. Use ~~~~~ (five tildes) to sign </nowiki>-->


* ] Accusation of Rotary plot to subvert neutrality of page. Claim that Dianne Feinstein should be listed as Conservative. Significance of KKK and Nazi associations of Rotary. Basically an edit-war. 19:45, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
* ] Probable pro-Rotarian fiddling around this article. We introduced criticisms due to anti-women segregation fight, had to insist to introduce second "gender-free" RI 2004 motto who terminates that fight, support of conservative politicians only, use of Internet by Rotary International, honorary membership given to politicians close to racists movements (Woodrow Wilson or Harry Truman) or extreme-right coup (Augusto Pinochet), honorary membership given to people having antisemistic positions (Charles Lindbergh), problem of use of "paid studies" program to renew membership. All langages pages in all wiki langages were about the same (template still active in Indonesian wiki for Rotary international) before our actions and without any negative points. All negative aspects, and only negative aspect, including Supreme court judgment forcing RI to allow women are ACTUALLY smoothed, faded or grayed, some repeted blankings are presented as minor edits. These smoothings were done by Rotarian user (CeeGee) or probable pro-Rotarians wikipedians who edit ONLY negative parts. The structure of criticism is even changed (a criticism against anti-women rotarian segregation as members becomes a "female membership" sub-paragraph with a smoothed content). We need help to review structure, find facts, allow a consensus to facilitate opinions and critics. We will put in the coming hours an official claim for Arbitration for wikipedia fiddling against Rotary International. Please note that is was recently done against Dianne Feinstein, the only actual Democrat Senator who is Honorary Rotarian. This is put here as the activity of Rotary is a service club( but claim ethics, and plays a role as a supporter of conservative politicians ).

Salutations from Belgium and ... France (sorry :-) ] 19:45, 20 June 2006 (UTC)


* For months a small group of people is trying to include the war in Iraq as ''part of the War on Terror''. Despite numerous editors telling them that using such a phrase is a statement of fact and a violation of NPOV which says that we should not be advocating one side of a debate. Therefore I started a proper RFC (]) to ask people to look at the situation, review the previous discussions and leave a comment as to what they think about the invasion of Iraq(]).08:09, 20 June 2006 (UTC) * For months a small group of people is trying to include the war in Iraq as ''part of the War on Terror''. Despite numerous editors telling them that using such a phrase is a statement of fact and a violation of NPOV which says that we should not be advocating one side of a debate. Therefore I started a proper RFC (]) to ask people to look at the situation, review the previous discussions and leave a comment as to what they think about the invasion of Iraq(]).08:09, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:46, 20 June 2006

Shortcut
  • ]

Template:RFCheader

  • Talk:Rotary_International Accusation of Rotary plot to subvert neutrality of page. Claim that Dianne Feinstein should be listed as Conservative. Significance of KKK and Nazi associations of Rotary. Basically an edit-war. 19:45, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • For months a small group of people is trying to include the war in Iraq as part of the War on Terror. Despite numerous editors telling them that using such a phrase is a statement of fact and a violation of NPOV which says that we should not be advocating one side of a debate. Therefore I started a proper RFC (Talk:Iraq_War#Starting_a_proper_RFC_that_mentions_all_views) to ask people to look at the situation, review the previous discussions and leave a comment as to what they think about the invasion of Iraq(]).08:09, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Talk:Lolicon I don't know if RfC is the right path to go, but I think this article is in acute need of external intervention. The page seems to currently be controlled by a group of people who are all other pedophiles or addicts (?) of lolicon. A link in the main article leads to pictures depicting lolicon, pictures which are illegal in several countries. I would also like to see the picture in the article go away.13:30, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Talk:United States men's national soccer team Can the number of consecutive qualifications to World Cup be used to compare performance of teams from different continents?13:16, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Talk:Leonardo da Vinci High School - Does a section discussing the school's environment violate core policies? Two-man editing dispute. 06:28, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Talk:Special rights There's some disagreement as to how specific or how general the usage of the term "special rights" should be in the introduction to the article. 03:47, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Institutional_memory An interesting concept which certainly deserves an article. The original was OK, but wordy, exclusive rather than inclusive of elements which are of institutional memory, with see also: everything else. After some edits reversion with refusal to discuss and a dismissive or pejorative edit summary doesn't seem to improve it. More opinions, also examples of such inst. mem. would be appreciated. 15:30, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Talk:Rape Whether the current lead-paragraph definition of rape should be replaced with a definition that Michael D. Wolok (talk · contribs) proposed. 23:49, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Talk:Water fluoridation. Is this version of the article violative of the NPOV#undue weight policy, and, if so, is this version preferable? Comments would be appreciated, as some users are attempting to skip steps in the dispute resolution process. 21:58, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Talk:Voice feminization: Whether women born with a female body, as opposed to transwoman, should be called "ciswomen" in the article, or plain "women". Both sides allege that one use is insulting. -- AlexR 20:01, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
AlexR is correct that there is a dispute. I would like to add that up until very recently when AlexR added it to cisgender a search on google of ciswoman site:en.wikipedia.org produced a find for only Voice feminization or conversations related to Voice Feminization which is why the description toggles between ciswoman and woman. FemVoice 21:48, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Talk:Dowling v. United States: Revert war between two editors over whether this article about a legal decision should refer to copyright infringement as "theft of intellectual property", emphasize that copyright infringement was found not to be "theft of physical goods" rather than just "theft of goods", or emph