Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 19:41, 25 February 2014

Marion rosen

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Marion rosen, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.rosenmethod.com/about_marion.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 05:41, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Marion hands.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Marion hands.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Misplaced Pages uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Misplaced Pages.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Misplaced Pages:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 03:06, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Rosen method bodywork

A tag has been placed on Rosen method bodywork, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Misplaced Pages:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Mblumber (talk) 04:22, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

I've deleted the article again. It doesn't have any independent verifiable references to support the article either factually or in terms of meeting the wikipedia:notability guidelines. It is also promotional - Rosen Method is suggested ... by whom? It also doesn't make sense - Rosen Method is suggested for people who are generally healthy, but physically and emotionally, but... jimfbleak (talk) 07:03, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

advice

As reviewing administrator I see that this is a method which has a substantial literature; further , the article is at least started in a descriptive, not promotional manner. So I did not delete it. But I alert you that almost certainly someone will take it for regular deletion , & in its present form, it probably will not stand., What I would advise you to do, immediately, is add some references to reliable 3rd party sources. The articles in The Scientific World journal are not likely going to be considered reliable here. Though Rosen's books can be listed, they are not 3rd party sources. You want article in more significant journals, and substantial discussions in books not devoted entirely to this method. Good luck with it. DGG (talk) 21:14, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Misplaced Pages talk:Articles for creation/Sixtiers.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Misplaced Pages! Zach Vega (talk to me) 21:49, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages talk:Articles for creation/Sixtiers concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Misplaced Pages talk:Articles for creation/Sixtiers, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 17:01, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Your article submission Sixtiers

Hello Etolpygo. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Sixtiers.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Misplaced Pages talk:Articles for creation/Sixtiers}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Misplaced Pages, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 15:54, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

• The notice above is misleading. It refers to the AfC submission Misplaced Pages talk:Articles for creation/Sixtiers, but there is no point undeleting that, because an article on the subject exists in the main encyclopedia at Sixtiers. You are welcome to improve that. JohnCD (talk) 21:36, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Your edits at Rosen Method Bodywork

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Alexbrn 06:47, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

You've returned to warring -- indeed it looks like you have exceeded 3 reverts in 24 hours and are now eligible to be blocked. Please consider discussing the matter on the talk page. In these circumstances there is often a misunderstanding about WP:NPOV, specifically WP:PSCI and its explanatory guideline WP:FRINGE. Consider looking over those again. vzaak 19:41, 25 February 2014 (UTC)