| Revision as of 20:20, 25 February 2014 editManul (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers8,647 edits →What: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:26, 25 February 2014 edit undoAtama (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers17,335 edits →Blocked for 48 hours: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
| Why are you adding stuff to an archived ANI thread? Nobody removed your comment from the original thread; they're just removing your addition to the archive, which doesn't belong there. ] 20:20, 25 February 2014 (UTC) | Why are you adding stuff to an archived ANI thread? Nobody removed your comment from the original thread; they're just removing your addition to the archive, which doesn't belong there. ] 20:20, 25 February 2014 (UTC) | ||
| == Blocked for 48 hours == | |||
| <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''48 hours''' for ] and violating the ], as you did at ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by adding the following text below this notice: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. However, you should read the ] first.<p>During a dispute, you should first try to ] and seek ]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. ''']'''] 20:26, 25 February 2014 (UTC)</p></div><!-- Template:uw-3block --> | |||
Revision as of 20:26, 25 February 2014
Rupert Sheldrake Talk Page
I don't want to get into non-topical issues on the article's talk page, so I'm posting here. I felt your input was not constructive to the discussion and misrepresented my argument.
I didn't say anything about Sheldrake's intelligence, the perception of his intelligence, the indication quotes might give about his intelligence or anything remotely connected to what you call transparent stupidity. In fact the replacement quote I sought out to build consensus said almost the same thing, the only difference being the context warranted it. I was discussing the context of the quote indicating a different meaning than the way it was used in the article, a normal and appropriate concern for any sourcing, as well as the fact that the very same quote was used in its entirety further down the page.
I don't know what you were referencing in your comment, I'm not sure if it's a case of not reading my arguments or if you're trying a to apply a canned response to a situation it doesn't fit, but please try to keep talk page comments respectful and pertinent. The Cap'n (talk) 18:34, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
ANI Notification
There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Thanks, The Cap'n (talk) 09:36, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Check
email. vzaak 15:02, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hatchet Job of the Year, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peter Kemp (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
Archaeology, You Say?
This is off-topic from our usual back & forth over WP:FRINGE issues, but I was curious what area of archaeology you're interested in? I'm a historian and have done some work at several of the old presidios, missions and at Painted Rock (San Luis Obispo), though my usual field is medieval and early modern history. Always interested to find someone else who's into old rubbish. The Cap'n (talk) 20:12, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Software Engineering Society
I am working on this and soon it will contain data. M. Adnan Khadim 11:10, 22 February 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Madnank (talk • contribs)
Disambiguation link notification for February 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vivian Davies, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Centre (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
What
Why are you adding stuff to an archived ANI thread? Nobody removed your comment from the original thread; they're just removing your addition to the archive, which doesn't belong there. vzaak 20:20, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Blocked for 48 hours
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Atama頭 20:26, 25 February 2014 (UTC)