Revision as of 16:10, 5 March 2014 editElmech (talk | contribs)51 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:23, 5 March 2014 edit undoEvergreenFir (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators129,255 edits →Edit warring notice: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
|} | |} | ||
]<!-- Template:Teahouse_HostBot_Invitation --> | ]<!-- Template:Teahouse_HostBot_Invitation --> | ||
== Edit warring notice == | |||
] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. | |||
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 18:23, 5 March 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:23, 5 March 2014
Elmech, you are invited to the Teahouse
Hi Elmech! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages. |
Edit warring notice
Your recent editing history at Roosh V shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. EvergreenFir (talk) 18:23, 5 March 2014 (UTC)