| Revision as of 04:05, 15 March 2014 editEvergreenFir (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators129,255 edits General note: Unconstructive editing on Roosh V. (TW) | Revision as of 13:02, 15 March 2014 edit undoSmyth (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers11,815 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == March 2014 == | == March 2014 == | ||
| ] Hello, I'm ]. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of ] to ] because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the ]. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on ]. ''also edit warring''<!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 --> ] (]) 04:05, 15 March 2014 (UTC) | ] Hello, I'm ]. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of ] to ] because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the ]. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on ]. ''also edit warring''<!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 --> ] (]) 04:05, 15 March 2014 (UTC) | ||
| You are now edit-warring on several points without engaging in discussion. But let me limit it to the point of how Jezebel should be characterized, which you were to discuss on the talk page. ]. I am now again inviting you to join that discussion. If you make the change again against consensus, I will report you to an administrator. If you make another account to evade administrative action, the article will be locked. Persistence will get you nothing here. Collaboration will get you everything. – ]\<sup><font color="gray">]</font></sup> 13:02, 15 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:02, 15 March 2014
March 2014
Hello, I'm EvergreenFir. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Roosh V because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. also edit warring EvergreenFir (talk) 04:05, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
You are now edit-warring on several points without engaging in discussion. But let me limit it to the point of how Jezebel should be characterized, which you were previously invited to discuss on the talk page. Three editors have disagreed with your change. I am now again inviting you to join that discussion. If you make the change again against consensus, I will report you to an administrator. If you make another account to evade administrative action, the article will be locked. Persistence will get you nothing here. Collaboration will get you everything. – Smyth\ 13:02, 15 March 2014 (UTC)