| Revision as of 12:47, 24 March 2014 editFlat Out (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers32,822 edits Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on Pattern Recognition in Physics . (TW)← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:43, 24 March 2014 edit undoTheRedPenOfDoom (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers135,756 edits →March 2014Next edit → | ||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] ] 12:47, 24 March 2014 (UTC) | To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] ] 12:47, 24 March 2014 (UTC) | ||
| :you are now blatantly in violation of ] having been reverted by multiple editors, please revert yourself before you are blocked. There is a discussion page where you may make your case why we should ignore our policies about using a self published source to provide unduly self promotional claims into the article, but I doubt you will gain consensus. -- ] 16:28, 24 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ::And I have been removing the content not on the basis of "I dont like it" , I have been removing it on the basis that it '''does not meet our policy standards for content'''. You have included a lot of blogware of non suitable stature and you are using the journal to promote unduly self serving claims. see ]. In addition the claims as you have entered them are entirely ] weight to the views expressed. | |||
| ::Misplaced Pages does not give "equal time" ] - it presents content based on what '''reliable third party''' sources have said. -- ] 16:43, 24 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:43, 24 March 2014
Welcome
Hello, Intuitive2000, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The Five Pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page
- Editing tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Simplified Manual of Style
We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 05:32, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
March 2014
Your recent editing history at Pattern Recognition in Physics shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Flat Out let's discuss it 12:47, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- you are now blatantly in violation of WP:3RR having been reverted by multiple editors, please revert yourself before you are blocked. There is a discussion page where you may make your case why we should ignore our policies about using a self published source to provide unduly self promotional claims into the article, but I doubt you will gain consensus. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 16:28, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- And I have been removing the content not on the basis of "I dont like it" , I have been removing it on the basis that it does not meet our policy standards for content. You have included a lot of blogware of non suitable stature and you are using the journal to promote unduly self serving claims. see SPS. In addition the claims as you have entered them are entirely WP:UNDUE weight to the views expressed.
- Misplaced Pages does not give "equal time" WP:VALID - it presents content based on what reliable third party sources have said. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 16:43, 24 March 2014 (UTC)