Revision as of 12:21, 1 April 2014 editShvrs (talk | contribs)330 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:29, 1 April 2014 edit undoBishonen (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators80,260 edits You have been blocked from editing to prevent further disruption caused by your engagement in an edit war on Raju. (TW)Next edit → | ||
Line 84: | Line 84: | ||
I have answered there clearly and you can read it there.Thank you -] (]) 12:20, 1 April 2014 (UTC) | I have answered there clearly and you can read it there.Thank you -] (]) 12:20, 1 April 2014 (UTC) | ||
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''24 hours''' for ], as you did at ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by adding the following text below this notice: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. However, you should read the ] first.<p>During a dispute, you should first try to ] and seek ]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. ] | ] 14:29, 1 April 2014 (UTC)</p></div><!-- Template:uw-ewblock --> |
Revision as of 14:29, 1 April 2014
Retired This user is no longer active on Misplaced Pages.Shvrs, you are invited to the Teahouse
Hi Shvrs! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages. |
March 2014
Hello, I'm Sitush. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Raju, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 07:30, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
- I have witten it in talk page & i have no need to discuss it with you,it is as simple as "the enquiry of any theft can't be done by the thief who had done it".Similarly, you are a culprit and doing mischief in Rajus article,so why to waste the time in discussing with you.And i know what to do.Thank you -Shvrs (talk) 09:41, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Raju. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware, Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Sitush (talk) 10:08, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
Edit summaries
Thank you for your contributions to Misplaced Pages. Please make sure to include an accurate edit summary with every edit. Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You have made several edit summaries where you state that you add information when you instead delete content. Thanks! Sjö (talk) 13:23, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
30 March 2014
Hello, I'm Fowler&fowler. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Yadav because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. You cannot alter the wording of a quotation from a reliable source. Best regards, Fowler&fowler«Talk» 13:29, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello Shvrs, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. Your addition to Agnivansha has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Misplaced Pages, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.
- You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and a cited source. You can read about this at Misplaced Pages:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
- Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Misplaced Pages:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
- Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Misplaced Pages:Copyrights. You may also want to review Misplaced Pages:Copy-paste.
- If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Misplaced Pages:Donating copyrighted materials.
- In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Misplaced Pages:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
- Also note that Misplaced Pages articles may not be copied without attribution. If you want to copy from another Misplaced Pages project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Misplaced Pages:Copying within Misplaced Pages.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dougweller (talk) 09:07, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Your addition to Raju has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Misplaced Pages without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Misplaced Pages:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Misplaced Pages. For legal reasons, Misplaced Pages cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Misplaced Pages takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. If you continue to add copyvio you will be blocked - you were warned before you added this again to Raju after I removed it (although I hadn't noticed it was copyvio at the time, you knew it was). Dougweller (talk) 09:38, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
- Mr.Dougweller,you were mistaken Rajus material was not copied from that yuva kshatriyas blog.These gotras and other things are explained in books written by k.S.Singh i.e "India's communities" & "People of India".See links: http://books.google.co.in/books?ei=8jg5U4uiJ4PyrQfgpYG4Dg&id=P3LiAAAAMAAJ&dq=people+of+india+tamil+nadu&focus=searchwithinvolume&q=pasupati & http://books.google.co.in/books?ei=KDk5U9-uOoS_rgeu_oCYAg&id=1lZuAAAAMAAJ&dq=india%27s+communities&focus=searchwithinvolume&q=Raju
I have written from those.Thank You -Shvrs (talk) 09:45, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
- I have written Agnivanshi material from blog but not Rajus.I hope you understand.Thank YOU -Shvrs (talk) 09:45, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
- Ah, I see. Ok, I'll strike through the 2nd warning. Dougweller (talk) 10:07, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Discretionary sanctions relating to castes
The Misplaced Pages community has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on any editor who is active on any page about social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties, related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The discussion leading to the imposition of these sanctions can be read here.
Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Misplaced Pages:General sanctions/South Asian social groups. |
Dougweller (talk) 09:48, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
- You are doing it again, despite someone else also reverting you. What bit of WP:CONSENSUS do you not understand? - Sitush (talk) 10:52, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
- What is your problem,please clearly say ? -Shvrs (talk) 10:53, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
- Can you say that Government of Andhra Pradesh don't mention Rajus as Kshatriyas in its caste list thats what is mentioned in srinivasulu and stated in 1.2%.Then why iam wrong and i have provided sources.- Shvrs (talk) 10:57, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
- Edit-warring is likely to get you blocked, especially given the discretionary sanctions that apply. Get agreement on the talk page. Dougweller (talk) 11:08, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
- i have explained to you & also the users are creating problems to version by reverting,that they are not understanding -Shvrs (talk) 11:27, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
- "ordinary users who always vandalise articles" - thank you for your appreciation... Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 12:07, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
April 2014
Your recent editing history at Raju shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Darkness Shines (talk) 11:56, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. The thread is Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Shvrs reported by User:Darkness Shines (Result: ). Thank you. Darkness Shines (talk) 11:57, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
I have answered there clearly and you can read it there.Thank you -Shvrs (talk) 12:20, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Raju. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Bishonen | talk 14:29, 1 April 2014 (UTC)