Misplaced Pages

User talk:Shevakumaran: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 05:16, 27 March 2014 editBgwhite (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users547,151 editsm Last warning: ce← Previous edit Revision as of 07:06, 3 April 2014 edit undoBgwhite (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users547,151 edits You have been indefinitely blocked from editing because your account is being used only for trolling, disruption or harassment. (TW)Next edit →
Line 26: Line 26:


<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''One Week''' for persistent ], as you did at ] and ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by adding the following text below this notice: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}}. However, you should read the ] first. &nbsp;] (]) 05:15, 27 March 2014 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-vblock --> <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''One Week''' for persistent ], as you did at ] and ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by adding the following text below this notice: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}}. However, you should read the ] first. &nbsp;] (]) 05:15, 27 March 2014 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-vblock -->

== April 2014 ==
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' '''indefinitely''' from editing because your account is being used mainly for ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by adding the following text below this notice: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}}. However, you should read the ] first. &nbsp;] (]) 07:06, 3 April 2014 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:Uw-deoablock -->

Revision as of 07:06, 3 April 2014

March 2014

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I wanted to let you know that I removed an external link you added to the page Relief india trust because it seemed inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 07:29, 6 March 2014 (UTC)


Sahara India Pariwar - March 2014

In case you have a NPoV reference on the medical condition, please add it. Otherwise the statement about medical condition cannot be put in an encyclopaedia as it is just a statement of defence, and this is not the adequate place for it. Similarly, no charges against Roy and other directors have been added on the page, because a neutral reference is missing. Only thing added is that he and 2 other directors are in judicial custody, which is merely a fact and does not take any position.

Champi4mcollege (talk) 10:31, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

I'm reverting you on the same exact edits you are still making. Stop. There is no need to have why he missed a court. This about the company and not the person. Only add if it relates to the company. Bgwhite (talk) 05:09, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Sahara India Pariwar. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

  • If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Misplaced Pages's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
  • If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Misplaced Pages's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Bgwhite (talk) 06:51, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Misplaced Pages, as you did to Subrata Roy, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. BethNaught (talk) 07:53, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Last warning

Removing any material about the trial at Sahara India Pariwar or Subrata Roy will result in you being blocked. The trial is relevant at both articles and has been covered extensively in the media. Bgwhite (talk) 21:31, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

You had to do it again. You removed material about the trial. You did add material about the bail, but it was already in the article under "Controversy". Controversy contains everything about the trial. The lede only mention the controversy as ledes are supposed to do. I warned you about removing material. You are block three days for removing material about the trial. If it happens again, the block becomes longer. Bgwhite (talk) 05:12, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Now you removed the entire controversy sections in both articles. The block is a week for removing all the material about the trial. Bgwhite (talk) 05:14, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of One Week for persistent disruptive editing, as you did at Sahara India Pariwar and Subrata Roy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Bgwhite (talk) 05:15, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

April 2014

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used mainly for trolling, disruption or harassment. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Bgwhite (talk) 07:06, 3 April 2014 (UTC)