| Revision as of 08:03, 2 April 2014 editSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,555,318 editsm Signing comment by 109.245.66.8 - "→Boris Malagurski - the article: "← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:38, 13 April 2014 edit undoMladifilozof (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users7,402 edits →WP:ANI noticeNext edit → | ||
| Line 92: | Line 92: | ||
| == WP:ANI notice == | == WP:ANI notice == | ||
| Hello. There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. (Note that I didn't initiate this discussion. I'm informing you only because the editor who posted it failed to do so themselves.) —] (]) 09:36, 29 April 2013 (UTC) | Hello. There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. (Note that I didn't initiate this discussion. I'm informing you only because the editor who posted it failed to do so themselves.) —] (]) 09:36, 29 April 2013 (UTC) | ||
| == You, Malagurski == | |||
| You, Boris Malagurski, are a proven liar, cheater and fraudster. --] (]) 19:38, 13 April 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:38, 13 April 2014
You. Message. Now.
October 2010
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. SpinningSpark 12:50, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
The Weight of Chains
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of The Weight of Chains, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.weightofchains.com/about.html.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Misplaced Pages:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:42, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 20:25, 26 February 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
pls email
Hi, could you please email me in regards to a checkuser issue. jayvdb
gmail.com Thank you John Vandenberg 22:37, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
weight of chains II
I've responded to you on the talk page for the weight of chains article.Sleetman (talk) 04:05, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
Balkans warning
In a 2007 arbitration case, administrators were given the power to impose discretionary sanctions on any user editing Balkans-related articles in a disruptive way. If you continue with the behaviour on Boris Malagurski, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article/topic ban. Thank you.
This kind of an edit is unacceptable, no matter how you characterized those sources on Talk. --Joy (talk) 09:34, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
Boris Malagurski - the article
My revision is based on pure facts about the case pending appeal. The facts are public, open to public scrutiny and relevant to the article about the author. On the other hand, however, your user account is being investigated as a potential sock puppet of Boris Malagurski wich makes your "undo-revisions" questionable. I have reported this incident as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.245.66.8 (talk) 08:02, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Why did you remove these facts from "your" article on Boris Malagurski??
Do these facts hurt your business? Boris Malagurski does have a Croatian passport, thus, he is a Croatian citizen.
Why did you remove SAP Vojvodina from the "pretty picture"? -- 17:50, 5 October 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.235.54.49 (talk)
Assuming good faith
Please remember to assume good faith in your interactions with other editors. Specifically, please don't characterize a difference of opinion on the content or categorization of an article as vandalism, as you did in this edit summary's comment on User:Bobrayner's edit.
That said, why are you wasting your time engaging with User:Opbeith on his user talk page and on Talk:The Weight of Chains? As you've examined his contribution history you already know perfectly well that his condemnation of others distoring, manipulating, and misrepresenting facts is entirely disingenuous; he's shown himself to have no compunctions whatsoever in introducing into articles his own factual distortions and misrepresentations when they serve to advance his point of view. His criticisms of your edits are grounded in neither Misplaced Pages policy nor reason itself, nor (as you have discovered) is he willing or able to identify specific problems with the article text, even when pressed with direct requests to do so. As long as he's not editing the article itself, and (not having actually seen the film) is in no position to make any informed contributions to the section he takes issue with, why respond to the kibbitzing? —Psychonaut (talk) 10:25, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
- Psychonaut, you're absolutely right. :) Thanks for the advice, and for alerting me about Opbeith's contribution history, I'll try to ignore his pointless comments from now on. Cheers, --UrbanVillager (talk) 23:50, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
- Me too. (And I knew he wouldn't be able to resist commenting here with more of his usual dissembling and disingenuous protestations of ignorance.) Just ignore him as long as he's not actively interfering in article space. —Psychonaut (talk) 09:37, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
- I'm interested to find you intervening here, Psychonaut, and particularly to find you supporting UrbanVillagers' approach to editing. Interested also that you find my interventions disingenuous compared with UrbanVillager's. You consider UrbanVillager's contributions to the Boris Malagurski and The Weight of Chains articles consistent with the spirt of Misplaced Pages and my reaction to them spurious. That's no real surprise to me, given my impression from our encounters over the years. Perhaps you'd remind me of my lack of compunction in introducing factual distortions and misrepresentations that serve my own point of view. If you've any reasonable examples I'm happy to remove them. Opbeith (talk) 00:51, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. --◅ PRODUCER (TALK) 13:08, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
November 2012
When adding links to material on external sites, as you did to Boris Malagurski, please ensure that the external site is not violating the creator's copyright. Linking to websites that display copyrighted works is acceptable as long as the website's operator has created or licensed the work. Knowingly directing others to a site that violates copyright may be considered contributory infringement. This is particularly relevant when linking to sites such as YouTube, where due care should be taken to avoid linking to material that violates its creator's copyright. Misplaced Pages takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you believe the linked site is not violating copyright with respect to the material, then you should do one of the following:
- If the linked site is the copyright holder, leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page;
- If a note on the linked site credibly claims permission to host the material, or a note on the copyright holder's site grants such permission, leave a note on the article Talk page with a link to where we can find that note;
- If you are the copyright holder or the external site administrator, adjust the linked site to indicate permission as above and leave a note on the article Talk page;
If the material is available on a different site that satisfies one of the above conditions, link to that site instead. You included numerous Youtube links violating copyright all the while lecturing others for the same thing. --◅ PRODUCER (TALK) 19:34, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
- User:PRODUCER was correct to remove the links within the references because of the above-noted copyright concerns. However, copyright concerns alone don't justify the removal of the remainder of the reference. You would likely be acting within policy to restore references (minus links to unauthorized copies) to any reliable sources. I have notified PRODUCER about this and suggested that he do so himself, though it appears he also disputes that some or all of the sources are reliable. —Psychonaut (talk) 20:34, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
- Alright, I understand. --UrbanVillager (talk) 20:38, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
When adding links to material on external sites, as you did to Serbian Canadians, please ensure that the external site is not violating the creator's copyright. Linking to websites that display copyrighted works is acceptable as long as the website's operator has created or licensed the work. Knowingly directing others to a site that violates copyright may be considered contributory infringement. This is particularly relevant when linking to sites such as YouTube, where due care should be taken to avoid linking to material that violates its creator's copyright. Misplaced Pages takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you believe the linked site is not violating copyright with respect to the material, then you should do one of the following:
- If the linked site is the copyright holder, leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page;
- If a note on the linked site credibly claims permission to host the material, or a note on the copyright holder's site grants such permission, leave a note on the article Talk page with a link to where we can find that note;
- If you are the copyright holder or the external site administrator, adjust the linked site to indicate permission as above and leave a note on the article Talk page;
If the material is available on a different site that satisfies one of the above conditions, link to that site instead. --◅ PRODUCER (TALK) 17:44, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
- Apologies, didn't notice the link was on Malagurski's website. Regards, --UrbanVillager (talk) 17:47, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 18:01, 13 November 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Mark Arsten (talk) 18:01, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Bormalagurski without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Misplaced Pages with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Jim1138 (talk) 19:07, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.255.57.233 (talk) 10:24, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of Nova srpska politička misao for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nova srpska politička misao is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Nova srpska politička misao until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Herp Derp (talk) 22:52, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
AN/EW
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Regards, Peacemaker67 (send... over) 14:43, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
WP:ANI notice
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. (Note that I didn't initiate this discussion. I'm informing you only because the editor who posted it failed to do so themselves.) —Psychonaut (talk) 09:36, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
You, Malagurski
You, Boris Malagurski, are a proven liar, cheater and fraudster. --Mladifilozof (talk) 19:38, 13 April 2014 (UTC)