| Revision as of 06:57, 19 April 2014 editKutsuit (talk | contribs)1,533 edits →Second time of asking← Previous edit |
Revision as of 08:12, 21 April 2014 edit undoKutsuit (talk | contribs)1,533 edits Archiving to: User talk:Kutsuit/Archive 1Next edit → |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
{{Talkpagecool}} |
|
{{Talkpagecool}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{archives|auto=yes|search=yes}} |
|
== FIFA 13 == |
|
|
|
|
|
Please stop reverting my edits. I'm filling in the references on the page to make it more detailed; which is not the slightest bit of vandalism. ] <small>(] + ])</small> 14:49, 16 August 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
:To back me up: please read what should be included in a references; I'm not using the format shown for the references, since there are more detailed formats for the references. The way you had the references they were bare, and the references are supposed to be filled out to show the information about the source. That is the basic way to source something, since you're relatively new to Misplaced Pages editing (you have sub-50 edits).] <small>(] + ])</small> 15:03, 16 August 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
::Okay, well for future reference (lol i'm punny) just revert back to the last edit so I don't have to keep reffing. Thanks for explaining. ] <small>(] + ])</small> 16:39, 16 August 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Your Signature == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hi there, Kutsuit! Just letting you know that per ], it is confusing to editors (especially new ones) if you don't include your actual username in your signature. |
|
|
{{quotebox|Signatures which include no reference to the user's username (for example by signing with a nickname, as in ]) are strongly discouraged, as it can be confusing for editors (particularly newcomers). The actual username always appears in the page history, so using just the nickname on the relevant talk page can make it appear to be a different person. If necessary it is possible to change your username; otherwise, ensure you include your user account name, e.g. in the form ]/Nickname. |source = ''From ]'' |
|
|
|
|
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
|
With that being said, you may wish to change it. Thanks! ''']] '''</font><sub>]</sup></sup> 21:34, 16 August 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==Talkback== |
|
|
{{talkback|Theopolisme|ts=21:52, 16 August 2012 (UTC)}} |
|
|
Great! ''']] '''</font><sub>]</sup></sup> 21:52, 16 August 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== CVUA == |
|
|
|
|
|
{| class="messagebox cleanup collapse" style="{{border-radius|8px}} padding:5px; width:75%; font-size:90%;" cellpadding = 5 |
|
|
|- |
|
|
| ] |
|
|
| Hello, '''{{PAGENAME}}'''! The instructors at the ] have seen your hard work reverting vandalism, and we would like to thank you. But do you want to go to the next level? Would you like to know how reverts, warnings, reports, blocks, and bans all come together to keep this Encyclopedia free from disruption? Then consider ] today! ] ] 23:43, 16 August 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|} <!-- Substituted from Misplaced Pages:Counter-Vandalism Unit/Academy/Invite-instructor --> |
|
|
|
|
|
== WikiWomen's Collaborative: Come join us (and check out our new website)! == |
|
|
|
|
|
{| style="{{Divbox/style/teal}}{{border-radius|8px}}" |
|
|
|- |
|
|
! colspan="2" style="font-size: 150%;" | WikiWomen - We need you! <br /> |
|
|
|- |
|
|
| <div style="background: #fff;margin-right: 10px;">]</div> |
|
|
| style="text-align: left;" | Hi '''{{ {{{|safesubst:}}}ROOTPAGENAME}}'''! The '''WikiWomen's Collaborative''' is a group of women from around the world who edit Misplaced Pages, contribute to its ], and support the mission of free knowledge. We recently updated our website, created new volunteer positions, and more! <br/> |
|
|
Get involved by: |
|
|
*Visiting our ''']''' for resources, events, and more |
|
|
*Meet other women and share your story in our ''']''' |
|
|
*Participate at and "like" our '''''' |
|
|
*Join the conversation on our '''''' |
|
|
*Reading and writing for our '''''' |
|
|
*Volunteer to write for our blog, recruit blog writers, translate content, and co-run our Facebook and receive perks for ''']''' |
|
|
*Already participating? Take our and share your experience! |
|
|
Thanks for editing Misplaced Pages, and we look forward to you being a part of the Collaborative! -- ] (]) 00:43, 10 January 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
|} |
|
|
<!-- EdwardsBot 0437 --> |
|
|
|
|
|
== European royal houses == |
|
|
|
|
|
You didn't mess up. It was my own computer's fault, which is why I reverted by revert of your edit. Sorry for the confusion. |
|
|
|
|
|
Cheers, |
|
|
|
|
|
] (]) 22:23, 29 May 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== October 2013 == |
|
|
] Hello, I'm ]. I noticed that you recently removed some content from ] without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Misplaced Pages with an ]. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, you can use the ]. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on ]. Thanks!<!-- Template:uw-delete1 --> ] (]) 08:21, 1 October 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==Talkback== |
|
|
{{talkback|JMHamo|ts=08:32, 1 October 2013 (UTC)}} |
|
|
] (]) 08:32, 1 October 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
] Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against ] or ], as you did to ]. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains under way. We have some ] to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the Misplaced Pages. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-move2 --> ] (]) 08:40, 1 October 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Results by round on Liverpool F.C. season article == |
|
|
|
|
|
Did you not read the comment on the Liverpool F.C. season article about the Statto source? Could you please revert your changes. Thanks, ] (]) 18:07, 3 October 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
:Thank you for that. As you know, everything on Misplaced Pages needs to be ] by a ] Happy editing! ] (]) 18:17, 3 October 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Hello there == |
|
|
|
|
|
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" |
|
|
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] |
|
|
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | |
|
|
|- |
|
|
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | I was thinking about you. Don't forget your morning cup of coffee :) ] (]) 12:28, 31 December 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
|} |
|
|
|
|
|
== Hahaha == |
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you for your message!! I was just saying to a work colleague the other day that we (Everton) needed to get 'stuffed' by someone, we have been drawing to many recently, and needed a good football lesson to kick us back into action again! I didn't expect it would be Liverpool to do this to us though! It hurts! |
|
|
|
|
|
Hope your keeping well. ] (]) 12:25, 29 January 2014 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Talkback == |
|
|
|
|
|
{{Talkback|Ithinkicahn|Regarding the "Justice and Development Party (Turkey)" article: your help needed|ts = 20:36, 7 February 2014 (UTC)}} |
|
|
|
|
|
==Talkback== |
|
|
{{talkback|Talk:Use_of_capital_punishment_by_country|ts=06:06, 4 April 2014 (UTC)}} |
|
|
» ''] ] ]'' 06:06, 4 April 2014 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Help needed! == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hi there, Bobcats 23! |
|
|
|
|
|
I noticed that you were actively engaged in this article, a few months ago: https://en.wikipedia.org/European_cuisine |
|
|
|
|
|
It seems that the user "Jerryine" is unwilling to keep certain European countries in the article for whatever reason it may be, even though the countries I'm trying to add to the article can be found in the template for European cuisine. |
|
|
|
|
|
Is there anything we could do to stop this irrational stubbornness? ] (]) 11:56, 9 April 2014 (UTC) |
|
|
:I advise you to reach an admin if it continues. I'll be following. --] (]) 07:59, 11 April 2014 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== European cuisine == |
|
|
|
|
|
Kutsuit, ] does not belong in the ] article - please see ], or , for example. --] (]) 06:45, 17 April 2014 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Kutsuit. While investigating a user complaint posted on my talk page, I noticed that some of your talk page and user talk page remarks have been less than ideal. For example, in '''{{diff|User talk:Bobcats 23|prev|603437374|this post}}''' you describe a user who disagrees with you as engaging in irrational stubbornness. And on my talk page, '''{{diff|User talk:Diannaa|prev|604576777|here}}''' you use phrasing such as "deliberately being dishonest" and "resorted to other antics" and "evident to me that you do not understand". Such comments on other people's behaviour and speculation as to their state of mind is insulting and demeaning of your fellow editors, who you should treat as esteemed colleagues, even though you may disagree with them on editorial decisions. It's not the type of professional behaviour we are trying to promote on this wiki. It's not the type of language you would use in person in the workplace, and it's not welcome here. Please focus your remarks strictly on the content, and don't comment on their behaviour or speculate on their motives. Thank you, -- ] (]) 14:21, 17 April 2014 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==Second time of asking== |
|
|
"That's not a fair request on your part and I would like to question the motive behind such a request. Why are you evading the discussion?" This, coming just one day after Diannaa reminded you just above to "Please focus your remarks strictly on the content, and don't comment on their behaviour ''or speculate on their motives''" (my italics) made me blink, as did your overall tone in that exchange. You'll have to stop getting personal or you may be ]. ] | ] 04:54, 19 April 2014 (UTC). |
|
|
|
|
|
:This is ridiculous. The user I'm speaking to also said I was being disingenuous. Why don't you ask him to focus on the content as well? I took the initiative to start a discussion with someone who contested the content that I was adding to the article, yet he didn't want me to address him. Then what's the whole point of the talk page in the first place? Who else do I address? This is really getting ridiculous. ] (]) 05:14, 19 April 2014 (UTC) |
|
|
::I'm sorry neither Diannaa nor I seem to be getting through to you. Please consider the impression your interaction style has been making on two uninvolved admins, who have no reason to favour IIIraute or disfavour you, and have a think about your ''own'' posts instead. Consider whether they might in any way be received as provocative or inflammatory. And then, whether you think they might be or not, just stick to discussing content from now on. (I think you misunderstood IIIraute. He presumably intended to ask you not to keep addressing him personally, i. e. ''by name'', because you were doing it in a negative way. That really needn't stop you from discussing content with him.) ] | ] 06:47, 19 April 2014 (UTC). |
|
|
|
|
|
:::I really don't care anymore, Bishonen. I'm out of the discussion. I've also been attacked with defamation, false accusations and speculations. Please just leave me alone. :-( ] (]) 06:57, 19 April 2014 (UTC) |
|
