| Revision as of 00:12, 7 May 2014 view sourceLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,307,002 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:Neotarf/Archive 1) (bot← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:09, 7 May 2014 view source Neotarf (talk | contribs)4,029 edits →Kumioko: answeringNext edit → | ||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
| Just leave a note on my ] account. Ill respond as soon as I can. Kumioko ] (]) 23:44, 6 May 2014 (UTC) | Just leave a note on my ] account. Ill respond as soon as I can. Kumioko ] (]) 23:44, 6 May 2014 (UTC) | ||
| :Also, I am not going to leave any more comments on Fluffernutter's page and I recommend you don't either. I don't want you to get in trouble for trying to do the right thing on my behalf. Kumioko ] (]) 23:49, 6 May 2014 (UTC) | :Also, I am not going to leave any more comments on Fluffernutter's page and I recommend you don't either. I don't want you to get in trouble for trying to do the right thing on my behalf. Kumioko ] (]) 23:49, 6 May 2014 (UTC) | ||
| ::This is not the "right thing", it is the fair thing. It is 99% certain that as things stand now, the community will reject your request, and the result will be painful for you. But you have the right to find that out for yourself, and the community has the right to hear your appeal. | |||
| ::My opinion is that you should wait, but that is up to you. | |||
| ::My opinion is also that you should reconsider your IP comment campaign. Your activities on various arbitrators' talk pages come across my watchlist regularly, even if they are quickly and routinely reverted, so I have a pretty good idea of what you are doing there. It is not having the desired effect; in fact, it is probably counterproductive to your goals, and mine. | |||
| ::If you want to respond to something, for instance negative comments made about you on-wiki, it would be better to request an unblock specifically to answer the comments. | |||
| ::The Reguyla account is deleted, and if you notice, account creation is also blocked. That means no one can post on that page. There is no email enabled on any of your accounts that I can find. That means you have a communication problem, assuming you still want to appeal the ban. | |||
| ::Fluffernutter has recommended that you communicate with me by email, because of the ban. My public email is Neotarf (AT) gmail (DOT) com. You could also post your request here, and I would be willing to copy it to ANI. If you post anything but an unban request here, I will delete it. | |||
| ::I will be monitoring this page at least every 2 or 3 days, I should be able to respond to anything you post or email within that rough time frame. | |||
| ::My last advice to you is to talk to a few people you trust privately before you decide to go ahead with this, then let me know what you decide. —] (]) 05:09, 7 May 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 05:09, 7 May 2014
Subpages:
- User:Neotarf/Signpost Arbitration Reports 2013 Index of my arb reports, a regular feature I wrote covering the Arbitration Committee for the Signpost during the 2013 arbitration cycle
- User:Neotarf/Arbitration Committee Elections 2013: Neotarf's picks:Slate for 2013 ArbCom elections
- User:Neotarf/EditCounterOptIn.js: Enables edit counter
- User talk:Neotarf/ArbCom 2013:List of Arbcom cases and requests for 2013
- User talk:Neotarf/Arbitration enforcement:Some notes
Kumioko
Just leave a note on my Reguyla account. Ill respond as soon as I can. Kumioko 172.56.3.160 (talk) 23:44, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
- Also, I am not going to leave any more comments on Fluffernutter's page and I recommend you don't either. I don't want you to get in trouble for trying to do the right thing on my behalf. Kumioko 172.56.3.200 (talk) 23:49, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
- This is not the "right thing", it is the fair thing. It is 99% certain that as things stand now, the community will reject your request, and the result will be painful for you. But you have the right to find that out for yourself, and the community has the right to hear your appeal.
- My opinion is that you should wait, but that is up to you.
- My opinion is also that you should reconsider your IP comment campaign. Your activities on various arbitrators' talk pages come across my watchlist regularly, even if they are quickly and routinely reverted, so I have a pretty good idea of what you are doing there. It is not having the desired effect; in fact, it is probably counterproductive to your goals, and mine.
- If you want to respond to something, for instance negative comments made about you on-wiki, it would be better to request an unblock specifically to answer the comments.
- The Reguyla account is deleted, and if you notice, account creation is also blocked. That means no one can post on that page. There is no email enabled on any of your accounts that I can find. That means you have a communication problem, assuming you still want to appeal the ban.
- Fluffernutter has recommended that you communicate with me by email, because of the ban. My public email is Neotarf (AT) gmail (DOT) com. You could also post your request here, and I would be willing to copy it to ANI. If you post anything but an unban request here, I will delete it.
- I will be monitoring this page at least every 2 or 3 days, I should be able to respond to anything you post or email within that rough time frame.
- My last advice to you is to talk to a few people you trust privately before you decide to go ahead with this, then let me know what you decide. —Neotarf (talk) 05:09, 7 May 2014 (UTC)