Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/ACIM church movement: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 11:51, 27 June 2006 editGareth Owen (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users6,215 edits []← Previous edit Revision as of 08:50, 28 June 2006 edit undoAndrew Parodi (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users6,627 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
* '''Comment'''. Just to inform fellow editors: it appears that the nomination of this page by ] for deletion is a “bad faith” deletion attempt. ] has recently submitted deletion nominations for all of the following ]-related articles: ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ]. And in the article ], ] will not accept ANY websites as “verifiable” websites with regard to ACIM, including and , both of which are the official websites of California-based non-profit organizations. This editor's deletion attempts are merely personal bias masquerading as adherence to Misplaced Pages policy. And it appears that this editor has a history with this kind of behavior. Please see: ] -- ] 07:57, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

===]=== ===]===
''Reason the page should be deleted:'' ''Reason the page should be deleted:''
Line 20: Line 22:
*'''Merge''' per Tevildo. --] 04:59, 27 June 2006 (UTC) *'''Merge''' per Tevildo. --] 04:59, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
*'''Merge''' per Tevildo -- ] *'''Merge''' per Tevildo -- ]
*'''Strong keep''' as per above comments. -- ] 08:50, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 08:50, 28 June 2006

ACIM church movement

Reason the page should be deleted:

This article is noncompliant to Misplaced Pages content policy based on:

  • WP:CSD#A7 - This article appears to meet criterion for a speedy deletion: Unremarkable people or groups/vanity pages. An article about a real person, group of people, band, or club that does not assert the importance or significance of its subject.
  • WP:NOR - This article attempts to establish that an ACIM church movement exists based upon the existence of two relatively unknown web-sites; niether of which reference an ACIM church movement, and is therefore based solely on original research.
  • WP:VER - This article is wholly information which is unverifiable. According to policy; facts, viewpoints, theories, and arguments may only be included in articles if they have already been published by reliable and reputable sources. Articles should cite these sources whenever possible. Any unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
  • WP:NPOV - This article is not written from the neutral point of view, and appears to hope to advertise the external links.
and serves only to further promote non-notable topics rather than to report what is notable. Ste4k 14:19, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

Strong Keep. It's not unremarkable, and significance is noted. User Ste4k appears to be on an anti-ACIM jihad, as this is one of a long list of AfDs this editor is suddenly proposing, all using an identical list of "concerns," above, and all from the same general topic. I have no personal interest in ACIM, other than that I assisted in arbitrating a dispute, and have since noticed Ste4k's unusual activity here. -The Editrix 15:35, 26 June 2006 (UTC)