Revision as of 21:30, 28 May 2014 editQuackGuru (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users79,978 editsm →Query← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:39, 28 May 2014 edit undoKimDabelsteinPetersen (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers19,610 edits →Query: In Utah! .... and you generalize that to be the world?Next edit → | ||
Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
::My specific question is, on reviewing this edit, do you think you are entirely neutral in this area? --] (]) 20:22, 28 May 2014 (UTC) | ::My specific question is, on reviewing this edit, do you think you are entirely neutral in this area? --] (]) 20:22, 28 May 2014 (UTC) | ||
:::I read the source again and I think the text was . Read under Prevalence: "Although dual use with cigarettes is high, some youth experimenting with e-cigarettes have never tried a tobacco cigarette, which indicates that some youth are initiating use of nicotine, an addictive drug, with e-cigarettes." Here is the . I think the text is currently neutrally written and the placement of the text was a mistake. If it is not neutral I would appropriate it if you could tell me how the text could be improved or reworded. ] (]) 20:56, 28 May 2014 (UTC) | :::I read the source again and I think the text was . Read under Prevalence: "Although dual use with cigarettes is high, some youth experimenting with e-cigarettes have never tried a tobacco cigarette, which indicates that some youth are initiating use of nicotine, an addictive drug, with e-cigarettes." Here is the . I think the text is currently neutrally written and the placement of the text was a mistake. If it is not neutral I would appropriate it if you could tell me how the text could be improved or reworded. ] (]) 20:56, 28 May 2014 (UTC) | ||
:::::Oh that is where it came from (the 1/3 figure) - Utah (this) is in other words generalized to be the US, even the world? And then written as fact in the ] article? Don't you see a problem with that? --] 21:39, 28 May 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:39, 28 May 2014
This is a Misplaced Pages user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Misplaced Pages, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Misplaced Pages. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:QuackGuru. |
Welcome!
Hello, QuackGuru, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Getting Started
- Introduction to Misplaced Pages
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome! 7&6=thirteen (☎) 18:32, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
An award for you!
The WikiProject Medicine QuackStar Quack! Quack! For your useful spot here, which led to a successful SPI, I award you the WikiProject Medicine QuackStar. |
A barnstar for you!
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar | |
For putting up with baseless attacks against you. Briefly looked at the "evidence" of poor editing by you and didn't find any Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 12:37, 18 February 2014 (UTC) |
And another
The Steady Rate Barnstar | ||
Tick tock, Tick Tock! All the best, Rich Farmbrough, 02:08, 6 April 2014 (UTC). |
Thank you for being one of Misplaced Pages's top medical contributors!
- please help translate this message into the local language
The Cure Award | |
In 2013 you were one of the top 300 medical editors across any language of Misplaced Pages. Thank you so much for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date medical information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! |
We are wondering about the educational background of our top medical editors. Would you please complete a quick 5-question survey? (please only fill this out if you received the award)
Thanks again :) --Ocaasi, Doc James and the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation
Query
Hi there QuackGuru. I recently implemented a topic ban in order to unblock User:FergusM1970, who recognised his contributions in the area of electronic cigarettes had become unhelpful. He has asked that I look at your contributions. I see some that are perfectly appropriate, but I wondered about this. Are you entirely neutral in this topic area? --John (talk) 20:12, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
- What is your specific question about the edit? QuackGuru (talk) 20:19, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
- My specific question is, on reviewing this edit, do you think you are entirely neutral in this area? --John (talk) 20:22, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
- I read the source again and I think the text was misplaced. Read under Prevalence: "Although dual use with cigarettes is high, some youth experimenting with e-cigarettes have never tried a tobacco cigarette, which indicates that some youth are initiating use of nicotine, an addictive drug, with e-cigarettes." Here is the full text. I think the text is currently neutrally written and the placement of the text was a mistake. If it is not neutral I would appropriate it if you could tell me how the text could be improved or reworded. QuackGuru (talk) 20:56, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
- Oh that is where it came from (the 1/3 figure) - Utah (this) is in other words generalized to be the US, even the world? And then written as fact in the Electronic cigarette article? Don't you see a problem with that? --Kim D. Petersen 21:39, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
- I read the source again and I think the text was misplaced. Read under Prevalence: "Although dual use with cigarettes is high, some youth experimenting with e-cigarettes have never tried a tobacco cigarette, which indicates that some youth are initiating use of nicotine, an addictive drug, with e-cigarettes." Here is the full text. I think the text is currently neutrally written and the placement of the text was a mistake. If it is not neutral I would appropriate it if you could tell me how the text could be improved or reworded. QuackGuru (talk) 20:56, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
- My specific question is, on reviewing this edit, do you think you are entirely neutral in this area? --John (talk) 20:22, 28 May 2014 (UTC)