| Revision as of 04:07, 29 June 2006 editWoohookitty (talk | contribs)Administrators611,228 edits →[]← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:13, 29 June 2006 edit undoNetscott (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users22,834 edits moron? lovelyNext edit → | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| :I understand what you are saying. But he really needs to learn civility. In his email to me requesting an unblock, he talked about how he wasn't personally attacking anyone and yet what was the subject line of is email? "Unblock me, you moron". --]<sup>]</sup> 04:07, 29 June 2006 (UTC) | :I understand what you are saying. But he really needs to learn civility. In his email to me requesting an unblock, he talked about how he wasn't personally attacking anyone and yet what was the subject line of is email? "Unblock me, you moron". --]<sup>]</sup> 04:07, 29 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ::Well, seems to be further evidence of a perhaps ''latent'' desire to stay blocked. One thing I'll say in his defense is that my last comment on his talk page was although censored fairly brutal (verbally trying to knock some sense into his head there) and so his response to it wasn't all too surprising and in fact he managed to remain relatively civil in comparison to what I was saying in my self-censored (not really) way. He knew that gift-for-living-with-us comment was rather off I believe. With an email like that I wouldn't expect you now to do anything more regarding his block but perhaps you understand slightly better my view on it. ] 04:13, 29 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 04:13, 29 June 2006
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 12, vfd comments
a case of blocking
Please see Talk:Heisei#Future Japanese dates. `'mikka (t) 16:08, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
User:His excellency
Not too surprising, he's not shy about accruing those who are quick to look with disfavor in his regard (on all sides). His block is rather a pity though... as in my view he was just beginning to genuinely make an effort to improve Dhimmi following User:Aminz's lead. Still you can guess what my view is from reading the "Mr. Walking contradiction" section of his talk page. I really have mixed thoughts in his regard. I think he makes valid points and when he puts his mind to it he does so with some eloquence but then there's another seemingly more dominant side that just spews out beligerent statements against a wide spectrum of people. Having read User:Tom harrison's WP:PAIN report and subsequent responses, I think you are fairly correct that he likely wants to be blocked. He constantly talks about abandoning Wikiepedia and encourages others to do so, maybe the block was what he was looking for to finally clench his departure. I can honestly say that if he'd just cease with the drama and the polemical statements and just freaking edit and do so calmly and consistently while assuming good faith on the part of fellow editors he'd make a serious impact (for the better) on Islam related topics. Somewhere he manages to have some charisma... but squanders it with the polemics. Thanks for notifying me of the block. If he requests unblocking, his request should be carefully evaluated despite his previous block log as Ambidhrohi , I say this because despite his changing usernames he did show who he in fact was and didn't just sockpuppet monger Misplaced Pages... and to me that deserves some respect. Netscott 03:48, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
- I understand what you are saying. But he really needs to learn civility. In his email to me requesting an unblock, he talked about how he wasn't personally attacking anyone and yet what was the subject line of is email? "Unblock me, you moron". --Woohookitty 04:07, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
- Well, seems to be further evidence of a perhaps latent desire to stay blocked. One thing I'll say in his defense is that my last comment on his talk page was although censored fairly brutal (verbally trying to knock some sense into his head there) and so his response to it wasn't all too surprising and in fact he managed to remain relatively civil in comparison to what I was saying in my self-censored (not really) way. He knew that gift-for-living-with-us comment was rather off I believe. With an email like that I wouldn't expect you now to do anything more regarding his block but perhaps you understand slightly better my view on it. Netscott 04:13, 29 June 2006 (UTC)