| Revision as of 10:16, 6 June 2014 view sourceDosemark (talk | contribs)30 edits == Hungarian Turanism and user:Maghasito == Politically-motivated Pseudoscience, and neo nazi ideas.← Previous edit | Revision as of 11:35, 6 June 2014 view source GiantSnowman (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators601,430 edits Undid revision 611801573 by Dosemark (talk) - moving to AN main pageNext edit → | ||
| Line 99: | Line 99: | ||
| ::I think that Misplaced Pages needs an actual adminstrators' noticeboard, where requests will be evaluated on their technical merits, instead of a mob scene where allies and opponents of the affected editors all show up and make off-topic comments. Just sayin'. ] (]) 18:53, 29 May 2014 (UTC) | ::I think that Misplaced Pages needs an actual adminstrators' noticeboard, where requests will be evaluated on their technical merits, instead of a mob scene where allies and opponents of the affected editors all show up and make off-topic comments. Just sayin'. ] (]) 18:53, 29 May 2014 (UTC) | ||
| :::Those who close discussions are normally not involved with either side. And in this case you picked the wrong venue. RFCU is the correct place your your dispute. ] (]) 18:59, 29 May 2014 (UTC) | :::Those who close discussions are normally not involved with either side. And in this case you picked the wrong venue. RFCU is the correct place your your dispute. ] (]) 18:59, 29 May 2014 (UTC) | ||
| == Hungarian Turanism and ] == | |||
| ] try to spread of pseudo science, the so-called Hungarian Turanism , which is now a politically motivated chauvinist pseudo-science from the 19th century and a core agenda of far right ] and ww2 nazi ] . There are not a single contemporary scholar (academics university professors) linguistics, historian population geneticist on this planet, who support that fantasy theory. Wikikpedia is a 💕, however it is not the place of the popularization of pseudo-scientific politically-motivated fantastic nonsenses. The best option would be the permanent ban of Maghasito. --] (]) 10:16, 6 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 11:35, 6 June 2014
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Administrators' noticeboard page. |
|
 | This is not the page to report problems to administrators, or discuss administrative issues.
This page is for discussion of the Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard page (and some of its subpages, including /Incidents).
|
 | This page has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 8 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Semi-protection cutting discussion of other threads
I understand why this is necessary (I participated in the original community ban of Kumioko), but it's killed discussion in at least one thread where the OP isn't autoconfirmed yet (see Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive261#Forgeten vandalism and User talk:Joshua Jonathan#Forgeten vandalism). 206.117.89.4 (talk) 20:33, 4 May 2014 (UTC) (User:Ansh666)
- The OP of those threads appears to have been blocked as a sockpuppet. So while, yes, semi-ing AN can definitely be problematic (as can not semi-ing it...), in this case it doesn't seem to have done active harm. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 20:52, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
- I don't know about AN but it seems like AN/I was getting blanked daily by different IPs. It caught pretty fast but it's a vandalism magnet. Liz 21:00, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
- ...which is exactly what I thought they were, but I couldn't post it. Thanks anyways. 206.117.89.5 (talk) 21:23, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
Bold move of Melancholia during RM
In a good-intentioned wp:bold to resolve to problem, user: Jytdog moved the page to a new mainspace title. Whatever the merits, it is entirely inappropriate to do so in a discussion that's less than a day old, RM is a deliberate process that can drag on for weeks, especially in potentially more complex ones like this one. I would therefore ask for an administrator to revert the move, as it brings confusion and derails the process. victor falk 22:50, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
- I'm fine with that. Jytdog (talk) 22:56, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
Done - let's not jump the gun here. bd2412 T 23:38, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
edit request on 28 May 2014
 | This edit request to Misplaced Pages:Administrator's noticeboard has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
hi
regarding- http://en.wikipedia.org/Flag_of_New_England
there is a sentence under the third paragraph of "history", line 2 & 3.
the sentence claims blah blah blah "...a red flag..." then gives a link to the painting.
the image of the painting clearly shows a blue flag.
i propose this "red" gets changed to "blue" in the text.
72.70.76.74 (talk) 06:29, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Not done: this is the talk page for discussing improvements to the page Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard. Please make your request at the talk page for the article concerned. --Redrose64 (talk) 08:54, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
How do things work here?
Can a non-admin close an active discussion topic here? I posted a request for intervention last week, and it was closed rather abruptly with a closer's comment that I disagreed with. I assumed at the time that this was done by an admin, but on closer examination, I find that this was not the case. Joe Bodacious (talk) 15:34, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
- Are you referring to this? ANI is pretty unstructured and it is common for non-admins to close discussions that experience suggests are not going to result in any admin action. Such closures can be reverted, but there should be a good reason for doing that—a reason should address any issues raised. I am yet another non-admin, but I have not examined the linked section. Lots of people read ANI and it's likely someone would have objected if they disagreed with the close. Johnuniq (talk) 01:54, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
- I think that Misplaced Pages needs an actual adminstrators' noticeboard, where requests will be evaluated on their technical merits, instead of a mob scene where allies and opponents of the affected editors all show up and make off-topic comments. Just sayin'. Joe Bodacious (talk) 18:53, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
- Those who close discussions are normally not involved with either side. And in this case you picked the wrong venue. RFCU is the correct place your your dispute. Werieth (talk) 18:59, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
- I think that Misplaced Pages needs an actual adminstrators' noticeboard, where requests will be evaluated on their technical merits, instead of a mob scene where allies and opponents of the affected editors all show up and make off-topic comments. Just sayin'. Joe Bodacious (talk) 18:53, 29 May 2014 (UTC)