Misplaced Pages

User talk:Theironminer: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactivelyNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:07, 15 June 2014 editHostBot (talk | contribs)Bots406,085 edits →Theironminer, you are invited to the Teahouse: new section  Revision as of 19:03, 15 June 2014 edit undoSchroCat (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers112,909 edits →QoS: new sectionNext edit →
Line 11: Line 11:
|} |}
]<!-- Template:Teahouse_HostBot_Invitation --> ]<!-- Template:Teahouse_HostBot_Invitation -->

== QoS ==

1. See ] and stop edit warring on the QoS article: use the talk page if you want to reach a consensus. 2. "Mixed" covers everything: positive, negative and, well, mixed. It's utterly pointless and stupid to put mixed and positive: it covers the same points. This has been discussed numerous times in various places and at the film project, so if you want to change the consensus, you have to try and reach consensus through DISCUSSION, not brainlessly edit warring. - ] (]) 19:03, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:03, 15 June 2014

Theironminer, you are invited to the Teahouse

Teahouse logo

Hi Theironminer! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Misplaced Pages and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Writ Keeper (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the TeahouseThis message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:07, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

QoS

1. See WP:BRD and stop edit warring on the QoS article: use the talk page if you want to reach a consensus. 2. "Mixed" covers everything: positive, negative and, well, mixed. It's utterly pointless and stupid to put mixed and positive: it covers the same points. This has been discussed numerous times in various places and at the film project, so if you want to change the consensus, you have to try and reach consensus through DISCUSSION, not brainlessly edit warring. - SchroCat (talk) 19:03, 15 June 2014 (UTC)