Misplaced Pages

User talk:Wickey-nl: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 08:48, 14 June 2014 view sourceWickey-nl (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users7,037 edits For interest← Previous edit Revision as of 18:27, 16 June 2014 view source EdJohnston (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators71,206 edits Complaint about edit warring at Civilian casualty ratio: new sectionNext edit →
Line 42: Line 42:


:I understand. In this case, the text was fairly coherent and unlikely to be splitted, but no problem. Cheers, --] (]) 08:48, 14 June 2014 (UTC) :I understand. In this case, the text was fairly coherent and unlikely to be splitted, but no problem. Cheers, --] (]) 08:48, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

== Complaint about edit warring at ] ==

Please see ]. This report claims a 1RR violation by ]. While reading the history I notice that you also have reverted twice in 24 hours. It is possible that whoever closes the report might sanction you as well. You might add your own comment at the 3RR noticeboard. It has not escaped my notice that more than one person might be adding non-neutral prose, but even prose that needs removing can get a person in trouble with ]. There is an ARBPIA banner on the article's talk page. Thanks, ] (]) 18:27, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:27, 16 June 2014

Misplaced Pages key policies and guidelines (?)
Content (?)
P
G
Conduct (?)
P
G
Deletion (?)
P
Enforcement (?)
P
Editing (?)
P
G
Style
Classification
Project content (?)
G
WMF (?)
P
Resources for maintenance
and collaboration
Cleanup
Categories
Create an article
Referencing
Stubs
Deletion
Polishing
Translation into English
Images
Controversy
To-do lists
Disambiguation
More

For a listing of ongoing discussions,
see the dashboard.

/Archive 1
/Archive 2
/Archive 3
/Archive 4
Misplaced Pages:What Misplaced Pages is not
Misplaced Pages:Footnotes
Misplaced Pages:Template messages/Section
Template:Which?
Template:Requested move
Misplaced Pages:Verifiability#Sources that are usually not reliable
Misplaced Pages:Identifying reliable sources
Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement
Noticeboards
POICA
Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/AndresHerutJaim
Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement/Archive139#Plot_Spoiler
Misplaced Pages:Miscellany_for_deletion/User:Brewcrewer/list_of_Palestinian_ax_attacks


WARNING

I do not discuss articles here.

--Wickey-nl (talk) 16:04, 26 February 2014 (UTC)


1rr at Jerusalem

assuming good faith that you forgot about the 1rr restriction I'll you know that you should self revert. thanks.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 16:58, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

...and at Beit El.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 17:39, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
You have more than 50,000 edits? You may study the rules first. --Wickey-nl (talk) 09:37, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

semi-protected

I semi-protected this page and your user page. Feel free to ask if you want the protection removed. Zero 13:22, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

For interest

Hi, regarding "Superfluous tags within one citation", for interest, there are a couple of reasons why I often tend to cite every sentence in ARBPIA. For me, it helps to keep track of exactly where things have come from while the section is being developed, especially when there are multiple sources at play and the content is in a state of flux. Also, when an article is likely to be targeted by sockpuppets, editors who have clearly decided that they do not need to follow the rules, the content tends shredded over time as they tamper with it, sometimes to the extent that it is no longer possible to tell where anything comes from. Sean.hoyland - talk 08:42, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

I understand. In this case, the text was fairly coherent and unlikely to be splitted, but no problem. Cheers, --Wickey-nl (talk) 08:48, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

Complaint about edit warring at Civilian casualty ratio

Please see WP:AN3#User:Yarron reported by User:Sean.hoyland (Result: ). This report claims a 1RR violation by User:Yarron. While reading the history I notice that you also have reverted twice in 24 hours. It is possible that whoever closes the report might sanction you as well. You might add your own comment at the 3RR noticeboard. It has not escaped my notice that more than one person might be adding non-neutral prose, but even prose that needs removing can get a person in trouble with WP:1RR. There is an ARBPIA banner on the article's talk page. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 18:27, 16 June 2014 (UTC)