Misplaced Pages

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3

Welcome to my talk page! Always be sure to sign your comments with four tildes:~~~~.

Emo

What the fuck wikipedia, I have scientific research that proves that Emos are not accually of this race, but are of a another sub human race

Last Change

It says that same exact fact on TV Tome.

Hey TBC, thanx

Dear TBC, thanks so much for your support during my recent successful request for adminship. I really appreciate it, as it's been a pleasure working with you so far. Hope the health is getting better. Let me know if you need any assistance; feel free to leave a message on my talk page or e-mail me if it is urgent. Take care -- Samir धर्म 08:06, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for a unique gift

And your signature hurts my eyes! Don't worry though, I found some eye protection. :) -Andeh 00:14, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Wikilove return! : )

Thanks for the Wikilove! I hope you like balloons.... : ) Armedblowfish (talk|mail|contribs) 14:42, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

Re: Need for Speed

If the infobox links are redirects, we can still create new articles from them. I'm not in favor of bias towards NFS games after Hot Pursuit 2, thus the inclusion of all major titles in my previous edit. Besides, it high time more is discussed about older NFS games. I'll return the links after the redirects in question are expanded.

Thanks for the heads up, though. ╫ ２５ 17:08, 17 June 2006 (UTC) ╫

Thank you!

Thanks for the revert on my user page! Who is that joker anyway!?! CaptainVindaloo 23:24, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

Jesus Day Event

I removed the "Jesus day" event you added to the April 17 date article. It doesn't appear to meet the notability requirements for event inclusion as outlined in the date article project page. The short of it is that it just doesn't seem to have had much of an impact on the world or world history. On a side note, the title of the Jesus Day article and the content seem disjointed. The Jesus Day movement involved numerous government leaders, but the article focused primarily on G.W. Given your interest in the matter, I'm hoping you might expand upon the article a bit. Cheers! Rklawton 03:47, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

Signatures

I hear you are the man to go for this. I want to make a custom signature for myself; I tried HTML code in the nicknames section, but this did not work. Can you give me the basics of how to make a custom signature? I realize you are sick at the moment according to your user page so reply whenever you feel like it. Thanks! --WillMak050389 00:37, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

Nevermind, I figured it out. --WillMak050389 00:56, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

Cap'n Crunch Article

The part about sexuality you removed from Cap'n Crunch is not a joke but an actual fact. I was reading an article about it.

Barnstar time

The Epic Barnstar I award TBC this barnstar in honour of his hard work on articles about historical figures and religion.Blnguyen

It's about that time

For someone with health issues, you sure do fight vandalism well. Hope you get better soon, whatever it is. (Mono?)

More importantly, I'd really like to nominate you for adminship. (I'd rather not create the RfA page unless you'll accept.) What do you think? Grandmasterka 02:33, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

I agree.Blnguyen | rant-line 02:35, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

I wholeheartedly agree; I was about to post a similar message. I would jump at the opportunity to co-nominate, despite the fact that you don't go to the best school in the world. joturner 04:32, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

Just say the word. You have noms and co-noms galore! -- Samir धर्म 04:34, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

He said he wants the 10k milestone first.Blnguyen | rant-line 04:38, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

Trading Spaces program and WP:UPH

Hello Tree Biting Conspiracy. I noticed recently on Esperanza's Trading Spaces program that you were listed as a member renovating another's userpage. I am here to tell you that the Trading Spaces program has left Esperanza and has merged into WikiProject User Page Help. WikiProject User Page Help is a new WikiProject designed to help Wikipedians with the technical side of Misplaced Pages, HTML codes, markups, etc. It has been discussed and the Trading Spaces program has been merged into the our new WikiProject. I have also come to invite you to our new project. If you would like to become a member, feel free to add your name to the list of participants. Whether you join or not, you're still free to join the Trading Spaces program. Cheers! — The King of Kings 22:17, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

Spam #2

You are receiving this message, because you signed up to my spamlist

I'm sure many of you who are using monobook have noticed recently an ugly sitenotice saying something about wikimania and scholarships. Well, to remove that, put the following in your monobook.css:

/* REMOVE THAT UGLY SITENOTICE */
#siteNotice {
    display: none;
}

I hope this is of any help to you!

Thanks, --GeorgeMoney  19:08, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

My (Mtz206) RfA

Thank you for voting at my RFA. My Request was successful with 41 supports, 12 opposes and 5 neutrals, and even though you did not vote for me, your counsel was appreciated. As an admin, I intend to work on expanding my involvement in the project namespace. If in any point in the future you get the feeling I'm doing something wrong, do not hesitate to drop me a line. -- mtz206 (talk) 02:31, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

Aksai Chin

I'm sorry, but Aksai Chin is administered by China and claimed by India as a part of its territory. . =Nichalp «Talk»= 05:41, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

Yes, but nowhere in that page is it explicitly mentioned that India has ceded its claim to Aksai Chin. All that's mentioned is the clarification of the Line of Actual Control. This is an article from last year mentioning that India still has claims to Aksai Chin. Without substantial proof that India has ceded Aksai Chin to China, it would be wrong to come to the conclusion that the area has beeen ceded based on the "clarification" of the LoC. =Nichalp «Talk»= 05:04, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

Vandal Proof Denial

Thank you for responing quickly, you said I have 179 mainspace edits. What exctally counts as a "mainspace" edit as I see that I nearly have 500 edits in my contribution history. --DragonWR12LB 04:10, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

ok thanks, I'll reapply once I have 250 :) --DragonWR12LB 04:16, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

Hi, Thanks for your comments

Do you really thing that is a high amount? Just curious, because maybe there should be a scale for individuals. I did the cite research on "A course in miracles" and basically it is unfounded. When I attempted to include the actual facts, I was harrassed by anons. :( Anyhow, it appears that one or two editors that new some of these people personally decided to try to establish notability rather than prove it. For these reasons, since I am mainly a "cleanup crew" person, rather than spend much time being trolled, I have decided to let the community make a determination for themselves. Hope this explains a little better, happy editing and good to meet you. Ste4k 05:36, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

Tagi AFD

I posted a message like this on the Tagi AFD page. It was for you and three other editors. You wanted to make it a redirect. I said that if Tagi becomes a redirect why not every tribe in Survivor history? What makes it special?TeckWizContribs_Guestbook 11:48, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

VandalProof Mod

Please stop moderating for now, the program is not recognizing you as a mod. I'll let AmiDaniel know. , Prodego 17:07, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

A markup favor

I just added some greek letters to my userpage, I'd like to have them up to the right like your mood icon. Can you do it for me, or tell me how? Teke 04:44, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the markup; I'm slowly learning html and java thanks to this dastardly project. Even more thanks for the tip on removing that gawd-awful header. Teke 05:03, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Working on notations

Do not delete author Greg Gallant entry. This is a reliable and accurate entry and notations are in development.

Re: Baked apple and Derek Wood (author) and LinkStation

I need a bit of advice !!! I have nominated the above 3 pages for deletion, comments are as follows:

• Baked apple : consensus = Merge & Redirect : How do I do this ???
• Derek Wood (author) : consensus = Keep : How do I do this ???
• LinkStation : consensus = Keep (Due to it being an AfD due to advertising and not notability) : How do I do this ???

Also, once the articles have been removed from AfD, how do I archive the discussions ? A lot of questions, I know, but I can't seem to find appropriate help pages. Thanks David Humphreys 16:04, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Military history WikiProject Newsletter - Issue IV - June 2006

The June 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Kirill Lokshin 05:21, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

A bad faith nom?

Regarding Marianne Williamson, just curious if you looked at the merge that was already performed, the notes on that page, etc. Ste4k 06:10, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

I made that comment due to your recent nominations of basically any article having to deal with A Course in Miracles. Though I do believe that some of the above articles need to be deleted/merged, I find it suspicious that someone would coincidently nominate all these related articles for deletion due to notability, without having some sort of possible bias. Even so, please don't take this personally and I hope that you aren't offended by my comments. I'm trying my best to be civil. :) --TBCTaLk?!? 09:41, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

No problem at all here, but I work on categories at a time. Please review my contributions if you'd like. In any case, the references for all of the above with the exception of Gary Renard's area and Marianne Williamson's area were all basically tied in a star of recursive and redundant loops which led nowhere for sources except to the main book. The main book itself, and the discussion about those are another topic which is currently under mediation, so I'll just keep my peace on that. :) There are several others in the category which I will eventually get to and take a look at. I try to run the verification of such things before submitting them, depending of course on whether or not those sources are already known. Before I happened upon the first AfD which was submitted by somebody else, I had never heard of this book before in my life. But now over the past four or five days of investigating its sources, etc, no, I haven't read it, and no, I don't read doctrine, but I can easily see when something doesn't say what it clearly cites itself to be saying. In the case of the page and Marianne Williamson's book, I performed that merge myself, in fact, please review the history on that page, and also, you might find that all of the references are now on that page fairly credible. :) Basically put, it was simply an attempt by somebody to again undo a merge which was discussed by other editors and on that note I'll keep quiet. I don't believe that it serves any purposes to become enflamed by someone whom has never shown me any good faith to begin with (that other person). I was hoping though that you would read that article carefully and my analysis and etc., before making any assumptions which are probably the result of an anti-me campaign. :) Please give them a nice slow looking over and I think you will find that I haven't anything to hide. :) Ste4k 10:02, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

Understood, but you should have added merge tags and/or discussed the issue on A Course in Miracles talk page first before having to nominate all the above articles for deletion. If anyone has been flaming you, feel free to report to an admin or other editors. Also, what's with all the ":)"'s, are you trying to parody my addiction of using emoticons in my statements, even in seemingly inappropriate situations*? :) :) :)  :)--TBCTaLk?!? 10:17, 30 June 2006 (UTC) *(note that I'm trying to be sarcastic)

Yes, I tried to discuss the matter on the talk pages and was told basically to,... uhm... there really isn't a polite way to say that. :) I try to stay on the even WP:NPOV, WP:0RR, keel. I don't play games, it's silly, and a waste of everyone's time. There were several anons coming out of the bushes to enforce any editing anyhow. It seemed to me the best choice at the time was to allow qualified editors to make those decisions, not myself, I only nominated the articles, and I didn't debate even though on many of the proposals, even my own words were edited. He did that to seven of them, then edited some back, then the admins got to others. Looking for that URL just now, I just saw that it appears that his reason for creating the article was to bait me. He knows that I am a woman and he has done everything in his power to irk me (but I am simply too old). Anyhow, I am working right now on documenting the entire murky smoke and whistles that lie at the bottom of these ((in my opinion per policy) incredulous citations for the book. Ste4k 10:38, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

By the way, are you familiar with IRC bootcamp? There are several people there that looked at it and said the merge would be a good idea. Anyhow, I finally finished that message about the cited sources, you can find it over in these Talk Pages. Ste4k 12:42, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

Lost Book of Enoch

• I noticed on the AfD you recommended a redirect while also stating you were not familiar with the subject. I think a redirect is the wrong thing to do in this case. If you have time, please take a look at my comments on the article.--Isotope23 13:07, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

RfA thanks

Thank you very much for your support for my recent RfA, which I'm quite happy to announce has passed with a consensus of 67 supporting, 0 opposed and 0 neutral. I'm glad I meet your criteria. Most of all, I'm glad you took the time to evaluate my candidacy, as I believe that's what keeps RfA running smoothly, and I'll be working hard to justify the vote of confidence you've placed in me. Please let me know at my talk page if you need any admin-related assistance, or simply if you have any comments on my performance as an admin. Thanks! TheProject 02:14, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

How does one . . .

From what I read on the discussion pages, Andrew has become stressed and abandoned the project. I would still like to get the category cleaned up and consolidated but doubt there is anyone around that really cares about the area that also has an NPOV. How does one exactly get a merge to be agreed upon? As noted earlier, I spoke with people on IRC that agreed it looked like a good idea on that other article. After doing so much reading on the citations, and becomeing familiar with the various entities in this category, while it's still all fresh in my mind, I'd like to get underway. Without Andrew around, now, consensus has taken a hike. ( ! ) Is there something similar to AfD that does the same thing as "merge merge merge" in the votes? Some of the articles have already gotten this consensus in Afd. I am wondering now should Afd be used to consult about a merge? After everything that's been said about these articles, I'd like a few opinions. Thanks, and please see notes to this regard. Ste4k 02:27, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the advice on the straw poll. The affair has become such a mess, and I have begun researching the book myself now. There are many facts that are in the court documents that are not being stated in the article, etc. So, I have begun a rewrite and it will be under a new name, after it is finished I'll put that up for a straw poll. I am very tired of his bickering, and trolling. He is uncooperative and anti-productive. His political games and abuse of the rules and policies are very immature. We are supposed to be mediating now, and he has claimed that he has left, but I've counted now at least three or four times that he has left today. I see no reason to further consider his actions less than hostile. It's one thing to assume good faith, and quite another to subject ones' self to patterened abuse. Hope this is clear, but still leaning my ear for advice. Thanks. Ste4k 06:14, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Red Shift (music)

I've rewritten the article... care to have another look? Grutness...wha? 04:35, 1 July 2006 (UTC)