| Revision as of 11:24, 19 June 2014 editEatsShootsAndLeaves (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers4,723 edits →Your signature: as intended, it sounds like← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:30, 3 July 2014 edit undoBoing! said Zebedee (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users96,327 edits →Condescension: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
| :: eatsshootsandleaves is therefore panda / esl / double prime | :: eatsshootsandleaves is therefore panda / esl / double prime | ||
| : I assume it's the prime/double prime that is just a tick ... which is what a prime symbol is :-) <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 11:24, 19 June 2014 (UTC) | : I assume it's the prime/double prime that is just a tick ... which is what a prime symbol is :-) <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 11:24, 19 June 2014 (UTC) | ||
| == Condescension == | |||
| Is there any way we could please get you to knock off the condescension? We (those who take part in forums like ANI) are supposed to be here to help newcomers, not belittle them and put them in their place. But what do I find? Hot off the heels of your "''Someone who says they "know Hinduism" '''can never''' call it a "religion"''" condescension, I find "''You simply use a personal ] for testing in non-article space like everyone else who read the policies and guidelines does''". There is absolutely no need for the "''like everyone else who read the policies and guidelines does''" putdown at the end! Of course he hasn't read all of our rules and guidelines - he's a beginner! We're supposed to help beginners, remember? Not berate them for not knowing everything!<p>Now, I hope you remember that I have a lot of respect for the admin work you do - I've said so before - but I'm finding you getting increasingly authoritarian and aggressive in your approach to interaction, and that's exactly what we don't need for welcoming and retaining newcomers. Please try to remember that we were all new once, and we all relied on the helping hand of friendship to get us started. So sure, point people in the right direction, but don't lambast them for not knowing everything, eh?<p>Anyway, I hope you'll take this as the friendly suggestion that it is meant — Alan / ] (]) 17:30, 3 July 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:30, 3 July 2014
This user has opted out of talkbacks
| This is EatsShootsAndLeaves's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Bad Language
check how Darkness shines is using bad language in revision history 15:11, 20 May 2014 Darkness Shines (talk | contribs) . . (3,183 bytes) (-724) . . (Bugger all I can say about it, I be topic banned) (undo)
You support Someone who uses words like bugger--112.79.36.29 (talk) 15:23, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
- Seriously? The word "fuck" gets used across this project almost every minute of the day, and you're complaining about "bugger"? As long as the swear word isn't used to describe another editor (i.e. "fucking asshole" or "cocksucker"), then it doesn't run afoul of any Misplaced Pages policy the panda ɛˢˡ” 15:39, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
So Bugger and fuck can be used. Is there any list of slang words that can be used by editors.I don't have that much experience. I need to know which foul words can be used as Darkness shines used bugger--112.79.39.94 (talk) 17:02, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
- I think we should also discuss the etymological background of that particular word. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 18:13, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
_by_Ron.jpg)
I saw your advice, but felt that userfying would do no harm (I also move-protected the version). I was trying not to Bite too hard.
Bearian (talk) 16:21, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
User talk:Hudson11377#Hudson11377, you are invited on a Misplaced Pages Adventure!
You might want to take a look at this thread, specifically to my suggestion to hat a portion of it, leaving the invitation in the clear. BMK (talk) 22:47, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
- Nevermind, I guess. The other editor involved hatted it, with a pejorative comment directed at me, which I changed to a neutral statement. BMK (talk) 22:59, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
do not talk to people who cause drama or allow drama.
you allow drama and allow people to cuss at other people and us swear names at other people, horrible qualities if you claim to be an admin on wikipedia which i do not believe otherwise you would have done your job and blocked such a person who broke WP:Personal Attack. so please do not leave messages on my talk page trying to make me back down when someone did wrong and no one did the right thing and reprimanded the user who did the inappropriateness towards other editors. if you want people to keep editting on wikipedia i would suggest you get those type of users under control because stuff like that will either scare people off or cause them to want to get wikipedia shut down, not that many people would care unreliable as it is, or so my college has told me. so please do not leave messages on my talk page. i do not associate or talk to people who cause drama or allow it. good day. 50.121.36.219 (talk) 13:52, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
- You're funny. I like you. the panda ɛˢˡ” 16:26, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
Menemen
Good day. If you want you can have a look at this page. A massacre happened in this town under Greek occupation in 1919. Greek sources speak of mutual excesses but a western commission who traveled to the area disagrees. They found it one sided. User Alexikoua disagrees and is doing revisionism on this page. Is adding massacres committed on Greeks by Turks while removing or rewording events the other way. Probably will accuse any user who disagrees with it. Dunderstrar (talk) 13:01, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
- You don't want me trying to get involved in content, or I'll be unable to get involved in behaviour. Follow WP:DR and get me invovled if the behaviours kick in the panda ₯’ 22:31, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
User continues making problematic edits, adds citation tag after sentences while there are already multiple sources. Dunderstrar (talk) 08:38, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
DUND. appears to be the reincarnation of permablocked user:DragonTiger23. His endless aggression against me as soon as he created his account left to no choice but to fill an wp:spi with sticking evidence. I believe its a matter of time to settle this.Alexikoua (talk) 09:28, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
User insists in another massacre article putting a casualty number of 35 in detail. Does this in disregard of the multiple western sources which give the total victims above 5.000. Its first addition didn't mention that the inquiry is based on 177 people. Is repeatedly rewording sources in different meanings. Problematic behavior goes way back in time. Removed in 2012 the link to the town in the Menemen massacre. Can this behavior not be sanctioned? Dunderstrar (talk) 18:30, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
Your signature
The last part of your signature is extremely tiny, and I have a retina display. Normal displays couldn't even correctly render that and would show up as a pixel. Just a thought. :-)—cyberpower Online 18:29, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
- Hmm, it shows up on every computer I use. Now formally, the last part of my sig is unimportant ... on both accounts the sig is panda, followed by characters that look like either "dp" or "esl", followed by a little tick for "prime" or "double-prime"
- dangerouspanda is therefore: panda / dp / prime
- eatsshootsandleaves is therefore panda / esl / double prime
- I assume it's the prime/double prime that is just a tick ... which is what a prime symbol is :-) the panda ɛˢˡ” 11:24, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
Condescension
Is there any way we could please get you to knock off the condescension? We (those who take part in forums like ANI) are supposed to be here to help newcomers, not belittle them and put them in their place. But what do I find? Hot off the heels of your "Someone who says they "know Hinduism" can never call it a "religion"" condescension, I find "You simply use a personal WP:SANDBOX for testing in non-article space like everyone else who read the policies and guidelines does". There is absolutely no need for the "like everyone else who read the policies and guidelines does" putdown at the end! Of course he hasn't read all of our rules and guidelines - he's a beginner! We're supposed to help beginners, remember? Not berate them for not knowing everything!Now, I hope you remember that I have a lot of respect for the admin work you do - I've said so before - but I'm finding you getting increasingly authoritarian and aggressive in your approach to interaction, and that's exactly what we don't need for welcoming and retaining newcomers. Please try to remember that we were all new once, and we all relied on the helping hand of friendship to get us started. So sure, point people in the right direction, but don't lambast them for not knowing everything, eh?
Anyway, I hope you'll take this as the friendly suggestion that it is meant — Alan / Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:30, 3 July 2014 (UTC)