Misplaced Pages

Template:Did you know nominations/Paco Campos: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Template:Did you know nominations Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:00, 23 July 2014 editYoninah (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers136,224 edits it's still incomplete← Previous edit Revision as of 20:41, 23 July 2014 edit undoJakec (talk | contribs)21,787 edits what's the point of holding this back?Next edit →
Line 26: Line 26:
::::*] No, it isn't. It's just been disputed; that's different. --'''] (]) ''' 17:25, 23 July 2014 (UTC) ::::*] No, it isn't. It's just been disputed; that's different. --'''] (]) ''' 17:25, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
:::::*] Sorry, "Interesting hook with a source. Valid date." is not a valid DYK review. ] (]) 19:00, 23 July 2014 (UTC) :::::*] Sorry, "Interesting hook with a source. Valid date." is not a valid DYK review. ] (]) 19:00, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
::::::*What's the point of going so far as to demand this? There's no proof everything wasn't checked, just like there's no proof everything was checked if somebody writes a thousand words explaining how they checked and spotchecked everything. --'''] (]) ''' 20:41, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 20:41, 23 July 2014

DYK toolbox

Paco Campos

( )

Created by The Almightey Drill (talk). Self nominated at 15:10, 21 July 2014 (UTC).

  • @The Almightey Drill: New enough and long enough, meets core content policies mostly. Honors section is unreferenced. AGF Spanish sources. --Jakob (talk) 23:28, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
  • OK, good. --Jakob (talk) 01:40, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
  • The QPQ review is incomplete. Yoninah (talk) 16:45, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • No, it isn't. It's just been disputed; that's different. --Jakob (talk) 17:25, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Sorry, "Interesting hook with a source. Valid date." is not a valid DYK review. Yoninah (talk) 19:00, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • What's the point of going so far as to demand this? There's no proof everything wasn't checked, just like there's no proof everything was checked if somebody writes a thousand words explaining how they checked and spotchecked everything. --Jakob (talk) 20:41, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Category: